Search results

an opinion on the certification requirements referred to in Article 43(8); (r) provide the Commission with an opinion on the icons referred to in Article

institution would also fall within the scope of Article 89 GDPR. Under Recital 160 “[w]here personal data are processed for historical research purposes, this Regulation

convictions under Article 10 GDPR. See, Albers, Veit, in BeckOK DatenschutzR, Article 9 GDPR, margin number 18 (C.H. Beck 2021, 38th Edition). The CJEU

Not to be offered to the Recipient Interim opening practicability H o w F o f b o a r d s Treatment round: 27/01/2021,(1 B ru ssel Section Market Court room

16Council of State no. 43.526, June 29, 1993, Arr. R.v.St. 1993, z.p.; BREED. 1993, z.p.; TBP 1994, 225. rPAGE 01-00003026497-0021-0025- □2- □1-� �Jl.� � L

first senate of 15. Dezember 1983 - 1 BvR 209/83, 1 BvR 269/83, 1 BvR 362/83, 1 BvR 420/83, 1 BvR 440/83, 1 BvR 484/83 (in DE) (Abstract in EN) - ECLI:

prosecution is undesirable (a so-called policy dismissal). T he M arket h o w a t w a ck both respect the orm e le and the material obligation to state reasons

§ 3 WG (cf. BGH, judgment of April 10, 2004 - IV ZR 75/03, r+s 2004, 404, 405; OLG Hamm, r+s 1992, 390 each on § 5 WG old version). However, the plaintiff

and Mr W have been involved in a dispute for some years. a dispute. The dispute concerns, inter alia, harassment and verbal aggression by Mr W and the

d violation of articles 11 of Legislative Decree no. 196 of 2003 and 5 of r R egolam ent (U E) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and o Council, because

own profile (applications r) - v)) and - "Group 4": improved means of contacting the defendant for paying doctors (applications w) - x)). With regard to the

article/and 5.1. c); 6.1.; 13.1. (c);13.1(e) and13.2(a)AVG: r PAGE 01-00001582885-0002-0033-01- □1-� r L _JCourt of Appeal Brussels - 2019/AR/1600- p. 3 - •

period of time has elapsed as a human rights concern (see ECHR, M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 2018, nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10, § 100)

not outweigh the interests of the data subject (op. cit. marginal 101 f. m.w.r.). In this weighing up of interests, not only the type (criticality) and scope

203/22, r+s 2023, 265 Rn. 17; BGH ruling of April 22, 2022 – VI ZR 147/21, r+s 2022, 478 Rn. 6; BGH judgment of March 7, 2017 – VI ZR 125/16, r+s 2017,

data. This is in line with case-law by the Austrian Administrative Court (W 258 2217446-1 on the presumed "affinity for a political party"). the data subject

case of the plaintiff party C***** W*****, represented by T*****, against the defendant party Ö*****, represented by W*****, for EUR 2,500.00 s.A, on the

plaintiff, (Agent: mr. R.J.G. Ensink), and The college of mayor and aldermen of the municipality of Dongen (defendant) (Agents: mr. W.C.J.M. Dankers and [name

officio 4. 3R.v.St., June 29, 1993, e.g. Vedesca, no. 43,526. 4 MAREEN, D., The motives of the administrative legal act, TBP 2000, 20-38. See also: R.v.St.,

2018, against the N*** party E***stadt (respondent), represented by Erich R***, for violation of the right to secrecy as follows - The complaint is dismissed

GmbH). Company A used the services of company C (Amazon Web Services EMEA S.à r.l.) a subsidiary of company D (Amazon Web Services, Inc.) based in the United

reasons cited must suffice to Decision to wear. r PAGE 01-00001823325-0031-0040-02-01-� �!l�l!I L oo-w. _J, Court of Appeal Brussels -2020/AR/813- p. 32

AFFICHE_W in addition to verifying that they are not necessary cookies, are identified by the website itself as advertising, IDE and AFFICHE_W or, They

for example, KG Berlin, Order of 4 July 2017 - 1 W 153/16 - StAZ 2018, 183 and of 1 August 2013 - 1 W 413/12 - StAZ 2013, 348). 51 In administrative court

regard to bringing the processing into line with aforementioned provisions. r PAGE 01-00002223628-0002-0011-1-01-01-� L _JCourt of appeal Brussels-2021/AR/282-

confirms the contested decision. This decision was made by Mrs. A.R. Sturhoofd, J.H. Lieber and J.W. van Zaane and pronounced in public on June 1, 2021 by the

ECLI:NL:HR:2017:208, NJ 2017/134 m.nt. S.D. Lindenbergh and YES 2017/56 m.t. M.R. Hebly (Donata/New India), para. 3.3.3 (which statement is also cited in footnote

v. Commissioners of Customs & Excise (1973) 2 AllE.R 943 and Banker’s Trust v. Shabira (1980) 1 W.L.R 1274 are covered by this Law and, by extension, are

processing of data, determined in a G e . m P E P ro p o r ti o n d of f a l e r e c t a r e n t s o S R C T P AV deceived by interested parties. Since then

Federal Administrative Court Decision date 09.08.2021 Business number W211 2222613-2 Saying W211 2222613-2/12E DECISION The Federal Administrative Court decides

as: [defendant] , authorized representatives: mr. O.A. Sleeking and mr. A.W.D. lensink. 1. The process 1.1. The course of the procedure follows from the

principle of 3DPG refers to ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2021:1296,r.o.8. 3DPG refers to ECLI:NL:RVS:2020:2833,r.o.5.2. 3Research reportAP of September 29, 2021, appendix

appeal. Adopted by mr. J.A.W. Scholten-Hinloopen, chairman, and mr. J.J. van Eck and mr. B. Meijer, members, in the presence of mr. E.R. Fernandez, clerk. The

appellants, by ABN AMRO BANK N.V., established in Amsterdam, Intimate, Lawyer: Mr. R.L. Ubels in Amsterdam. 1Process 1.1 Appellants are hereinafter jointly referred

hedonists 11.54% The supplier of the above data is: W *** Direkt GmbH ***Street * 1 *** Vienna Email: office@w***.at Planned storage period: If data transfer

212-1, L.212-3, L.2141-1, L.211-1, L.232-1, R.631-3, L.621-1, L.621-2, L.621-7, L. 621-8, R.111-2, R.111-3, R.212-1, - Considering the law n ° 78-17 of January

the provisions on the protection of personal data by Ms. K.W. running a business under the name W. with its place of business in O. at ul. (…), President

and Food Safety Act (GESG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 63/2002 as amended. R E G R O U N D U N G A. Arguments of the parties and procedure Arguments of the

entity: H**** non-profit housing AG (FN 1*5*9* r) The accused legal entity, based in **** R***stadt, W***straße 1*-5* (hereinafter “H****”), is the responsible

was written on the patient A. W. But these are not the data of this patient. The data belongs to patient A. W. Patient A. W. does not exist with such data

Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 15 May 2018, ECLI:NL:GHARL:2018:4396, JA 2018/99 m.nt. R.W.M. Giard, r. 4.5. 49Parliamentary Papers II 1989/90, 21561, no. 3 (explanatory memorandum)

reasons disapproved by the court (see W.-R. Schenke in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 29th edition 2023, § 121 Rn. 9f. m.w.N. ). The legal issues that are the subject

Social Welfare Center in G., the Housing Cooperative in G. G., U. Sp. z o. o. w G .. The need to obtain the requested personal data was justified by the fear

defendant herself, but their data protection officer Ms. J. R., who is based at the parent company R. According to Art. 12 (1) GDPR, a person responsible only

submitting an application through a broker or R. SA, an agent cooperating with the broker or an employee of an outlet of R. SA is involved in the process of submitting

spelling, grammar and punctuation errors have been corrected.] NOTICE S P R U C H The DPA decides on Gustav A***'s privacy complaints (Appellant) of August

situation applicable at the time of the last oral hearing. 25 Cf. W.-R. Schenke / R.P. Schenke, in: Kopp / Schenke, VwGO, 27th edition 2021, § 113 Rn.

the AP, represented by W. van Steenbergen and J.M.A. Koster, have appeared. Connexxion, represented by mr. E.C. de Vries and mr. J.R. van Dorp, lawyers in

Chamber),composed of D. Spielmann, President, V. Valančius (Rapporteur) and R. Mastroianni, Judges,Registrar: V. Di Bucci,having regard to the written part

downloadable at the address: h t t p: / / a r e a d o c u m e n t a l. s e r v i z i r l. i t / a t t i / d o w n l o a d /AAAAYBnbrd+mLfAGu+72pN0QYxN3M4

mr. M.G.J.M. van Kempen, chairman, and mr. R. den Ouden and mr. V.F.R. Woeltjes, in the presence of mr. P.W.L. van den Bersselaar as clerk. The decision

appeal Brussels -2020/AR/582- p. 6 2. The written procedure (Article 755 Judg. W.). Partly in view of the health risks that the COVID-19 pandemic entails and

which is different or more advanced. This order was issued by R.R.M. de Moor, A.J. Henzen and M.W.M. Souren and publicly announced on 6 August 2020.

-BFH-, judgments of April 11, 2012, I R 63/11, Federal Tax Gazette -BStBl - II 2012, 539; of December 16, 1987 - I R 66/84 -, collection of officially unpublished

(LG Frankfurt a.M., decision of 10.09.2018 - 2-03 O 310/18, MMR 2018, 770 m.w.r.). According to these provisions, a ban can also be justified under Article

plaintiff is the wife of... G. The defendant is the editor of the magazine "W". In issue no. 40 of ... 2015, the defendant published an article entitled

constituency (BVerfG, decision of September 20, 2016 - 2 BvR 2453/15 -, juris para. 21 [m. w.n.]). The Office of the State Commissioner for Data Protection

right to request to be heard by the Disputes Chamber of the GBA. The petition w was notified to the GBA by court order dated 9 May 2019 with summons to appear

ambassador sent by the government of ****, who had been the project coordinator for W*** for the first respondent since May 1, 2022 for a period of 12 months. The

registered office in W. purchased a receivable from (...) Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością S.K.A. with its registered office in W. A party to the loan

October 1966 - 2 BvR 506/63, NJW 1967, 195; judgment of 30 June 1976 - 2 BvR 435/76, NJW 1976, 1883; order of 14 July 1981 - 1 BvR 575/80). This therefore

Protocoleptor Bożena Kowalska on the action brought by Mr C. v. A. K. and W. G. with the participation of the Public Prosecutor and the Ombudsman to protect

Ms. S.P. gave the signature to the head nurse, K.R., and after that date the signature was with K.R. so that she could continue to update the vaccination

Borman, member of the single chamber, in the presence of Mr R. Grimbergen, Registrar. w.g. Borman w.g. Grimbergen member of the single chamber of the Registrar

Daalder, chairman, and mr. C.C.W. Lange and mr. W. den Ouden, members, in the presence of mr. B. Ley-Nell, registrar. w.g. descender chair The Registrar

Gundelach, members, in the presence of mr. A.M.E.A. Neuwahl, clerk. w.g. from Altena chair w.g. Neuwahl clerk Pronounced in public on July 20, 2022 280-973

that each party bears its own costs. This decision was made by Mrs. R.R.M. de Moor, J.W. van Rijkom and T. van der Valk and pronounced in public on 15 July

Vienna Higher Regional Court as the court of appeal of 9 December 2020, GZ 14 R 143/20g24, whereby the judgment of the Vienna Regional Court for Civil Matters

only provisionally (see BVerfG, Order of 19.10.2006 - 2 BvR 2023/06, juris, marginal no. 13, EuR 2006, 814).

ambassador sent by the government of ****, who had been the project coordinator for W*** for the first respondent since May 1, 2022 for a period of 12 months. The

referred to in Chapter IX, European Union law or theItpotr 0r,-0000r53sesê-00r,r,-00as-01,-0r-flL ffiJ Page 13 Brussels Court of Appeal - 20201 AR/II60 -

for customer service, product development and BU performance testing) and R. S. (assistant to the branch manager in Austria and data protection officer)

used A. S.à.r.l. as a subcontractor. The agreement between the third party and A. S.à.r.l. in implementation Article 28 GDPR allowed A. S.à.r.l. to disclose

gImkxOG4uaW1wb3J0Lm9yLnBhc3RlLmNvbnRlbnQiIDogIlR1byAvIExpaXTDpCBzaXPDpGx0w7YiLAogICJpMThuLmNob29zZS50ZXh0LmFsaWduIiA6ICJWYWxpdHNlIHRla3N0aW4gdGFzYXVzI

office in W. at Al. (…), President of the Personal Data Protection Office, finding a violation by H. Sp. z o. o. with its registered office in W. at Al.

administrative court dr S...the judge at the administrative court P...the judge R...and by honorary judge...honorary judge...on the basis of the hearing on November

Minister), consisting in the delivery to the addressee by the postal operator R. (...) of a damaged and incomplete correspondence containing personal data

authority data.nl Confidential/Registered UWV Board of Directors Attn. Mr.M.R.P.M.Camps PO Box58285 1040HG AMSTERDAM Date Unidentified May 31, 2021 [CONFIDENTIAL]

probability speaks in favour of success in the main proceedings as well (see only W.-R. Schenke, in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 24th ed. 2018, para. 123 marginal no. 14

This statement was made by mr. G.H.W. Bodt, chairman, mr. S.A. van Hoof and mr. M. Ichoh, judges, in the presence of R. van Diest, registrar. The decision

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 4 . 0 3 . 2 0 2 2 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 5 3 2 2 2 6 2 6 1 - 1/8 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court has

place in disregard of the suspensive effect of an appeal, 29 cf. on this: W.-R. Schenke in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 27th edition 2021, § 80 Rdn. 20. 30 This

rule, were only displayed in full to employees who worked with them (e.g. W, S, Receivables Management), while only the last four digits of the IBAN were

yet been conclusively clarified by case law (cf. Sesing MMR 2021, 544, 547 m.w.N. ). In the event of a dispute, the question of such a requirement of equivalence

[residence], APPLICANT for cassation, hereinafter: [person involved], lawyer: H.J.W. alto, against GOOGLE LLC, based in Mountain View, California, United States

in the case between [plaintiff] , in Amstelveen, plaintiff (Agents: mr. E.W.S. Peperkamp, mr. S.E.A. Vermeer-de Jongh and mr. G.N.N. camp house), and Dutch

April 15, 2021 at the litigation secretariat of the Council of State, Ms. W ... A ..., Mr. AA ... U ... and Mrs Y ... O ... ask the Council of State: 1

lawyer's salary. This decision was made by Mrs. H.J. van Kooten, R.S. van Coevorden and R.W. Polak, and was pronounced in open court on 14 December 2021 in

</script><script> (function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o)

as: [defendant] , authorized representatives: mr. O.A. Sleeking and mr. A.W.D. lensink. 1. The process 1.1. The course of the procedure follows from the

statement was made by mr. L.M. Reijnierse, judge, in the presence of mr. E.H.W. Schierbeek, clerk. The decision was pronounced on November 10, 2020 and will

November 26, 2020, GZ 3 R 128 / 20v-15 , with which the judgment of the Salzburg Regional Court of August 14, 2020, GZ 4 Cg 67 / 19w-9, was partially amended

refers to the judgment of the Federal Fiscal Court of October 28, 2009 (VIII R 78/05) and the ruling of the Bavarian State Office for Taxes of March 28, 2020

telephone (video) connection. The agents of defendants J. Stoffels (Roerdalen), R. Timmers (Valkenburg aan de Geul), M. Orasanin (Vaals) and Mr. A.A.C.M. Gidding-Baade

Bodewits), and the Dutch Data Protection Authority, defendant (attorneys: mr. W. van Steenbergen and mr. E Nijhof). Procedure By decision of 23 September 2019

operates in Belgium, and the complainant has been a senior executive of Company W for some time. years, i.e. a company that is closely related to Company Z.

business number W245 2252208-1/36E W245 2252221-1/30E Written copy of the verbal decision announced on March 31, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K 

of 26 January 2006, p. 1). July 2017 - RiZ (R) 3/16 -, juris marginal no. 15 and of 16 March 2005 - RiZ (R) 2/04 -, juris marginal no. 20; VG Potsdam,

represented by his counsel Mr. Dr. Jan-Henning Strunz, Matray, Matray & Hallet, s.c.r.l, rue des Fories, 2, 4020 Liège, hereinafter “the plaintiff” The defendant:

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 9 . 0 4 . 2 0 2 2 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 5 8 2 2 4 7 0 2 8 - 1 / 1 1 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court

case of monocratic jurisdiction, there is administration (Muzak, B-VG6 Art 87 R 2 f). According to Article 87, paragraph 2, B-VG, a judge is “in the exercise

detailed presentation can be dispensed with in this respect. 2.2.3 Regarding W 258 2216873, the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG) in its decision of 30

AUGUST 2021 [doc. web n. 9685994] Order injunction against Deliveroo Italy s.r.l. - July 22, 2021 Record of measures n. 285 of 22 July 2021 THE GUARANTOR

random=1672750512146 &cv=11&fst=1672747200000&bg=fffff&guid=ON&async=1&gtm=2oabu0&u_w=1920 &u_h=1080&frm=0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.telekom.de%2Fstart &tiba=Teleko

this case was the complaint of the Bank [...] Spółka Akcyjna with its seat in W. against the decision of the President of the Personal Data Protection Office

person with NIPC 506204367 and headquarters at Rua de Sao Tomee Principe, 18 r/c Oto. , 2900-087 Setubal, dedicates itself to support for immigrants from

breach by TUiR WARTA SA with its seat in W., President of the Personal Data Protection Office,finding that TUiR WARTA SA with its seat in W. has breached

plaintiff (...) with its seat in W. purchased the debt from (...) Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością S.K.A. with its seat in W. Party to the loan agreement

original for more details. 1/7  File No.: TD / 00044/2021 RESOLUTION NO: R / 00423/2021 Considering the claim made before this Agency by A.A.A. (hereinafter

that AEPD R/02863/2016 of December 14 - Procedure No.: A/00242/2016-, R/02906/2015 of December 17 November- Procedure No.: A/00172/2015- or R/00001/2015

itself (cf. BVerfG, resolution of 21 April 2015 - 2 BvR 1322/12, 2 BvR 1989/12 -, juris recital 52 m. w. N.; SächsOVG, decision of 29. April 2020 - 3 B 144/20

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 6 3 5 5 - 1/2 0 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes

Division heard the case on 15 January 2019, where the Board, represented by W.J.R. Krol and L. Schieving, and [appellant under 2], represented by [agent],

Court of August 22, 2019, Zl. W256 2213660-1/4E, regarding a data protection matter (participating parties: 1. C GmbH in W, represented by Dr. Friedrich

BRUSSELS, JosephStevensstraat7, fifth applicant, 6. LIGUE DES DROITS HUMAINS V.Z.W. c/o, with registered office at 1000 Brussels, Kogelstraat 22, but choosing

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 0 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 2 6 3 8 - 1/1 0 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes

DECISIONS D A T U M 0 7 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 1 0 1 2 2 0 8 2 3 8 - 1/5 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, through

Court of Finance, judgement of 26 June 2019, 11 LA 274/18. 19 March 2013, II R 17/11, loc. cit., decision of 15 September 2010, II B 4/10; regarding the InsO:

[place of residence], plaintiffs by subpoena dated June 2, 2020, lawyers mr. W. Brussee in The Hague and mr. S. van Londen in Hilversum, against the legal

no further payment stoppages or defaults (BVwG W 2 58 2216873-1 on a similar case; confirmed by BVwG W274 22 3 2028-1). The age of the claim or the point

Jagielska, J. Jagielski, R. Stankiewicz, M. Grzywacz, art. 149, in: Law on proceedings before administrative courts. Commentary, ed. R. Hauser, M. Wierzbowski

down the more or else requested. This decision was made by Mrs. N.W.M. van den Heuvel, R.R.M. the Moor and T. van der Valk and was pronounced in public on

where appropriate, of the personal data. - With reference to its Resolution R/00818/2012, the capture of images of public spaces by private surveillance

Provincial Administrative Court in Rzeszów (Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Rzeszowie - WSA Rzeszów). The WSA Rzeszów overturned the decision from the

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 6 1 6 6 - 1/4 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes

Regional Court) as the court of appeal of 24 April 2020, GZ 14 R 159. April 2020, GZ 14 R 159/19h-13, whereby the judgment of the Regional Court for Civil

Procedure. The Kp. Pursuant to Article 12 (2) (a) of the Administrative P r o c e d u r e Act, an administrative action against a decision of the Authority is

with article 1034quinquies of the Ger.W. , or via the e-Deposit IT system of Justice (Article 32ter of the Ger.W.). (get). Hielke HIJMANS Chairman of the

at Decision date July 10, 2023 business number W256 2234976-1/19E W256 2234976-2/19E I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Federal Administrative Court

original for more details. Ro 2020/04/0031-9 February 1, 2024 I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Administrative Court has through the presiding Senate President

during the control activity: see previous point 1.1., spec. letter m., r., t ., w.), preordained to assign a score to the rider for the declared purpose

without, however, sharing the PIN and PUK codes ”(see cit. note, p. 24, 25); r. “Company telephone and SIM therefore remained available to the Complainant

Duschel, Mag. Klaus Hanten, lawyers in Vienna, against the defendant City of W*****, represented by Dr. Andreas Joklik, lawyer in Vienna. Andreas Joklik,

Spanish original for more details. 1/4  File No.: EXP202203923 RESOLUTION Nº: R/00738/2022 Having regard to the claim made on March 7, 2022 before this Agency

He also referred to an article he wrote about the GDPR in the magazine "f & w lead and manage in the hospital", issue 02/17. The penultimate sentence of

of the original. Please refer to the Bulgarian original for more details. R E W E N I E No. 8 Sofia, 15 November 20 1 9 (Promulgated SG No. 99 of November

is mandatory if the conditions are met (see VG Würzburg, B.v. 28.1.2020 - W 8 E 19.1669 - juris marginal no. 48; Rathke in Zipfel/Rathke, Lebensmittelrecht

M. Georgieva and T. Mitova, acting as Agents, – the French Government, by R. Bénard, A.-L. Desjonquères, D. Dubois and T. Stéhelin, acting as Agents, –

has a right to refuse to give evidence or testify (see BayVGH, loc.cit. m.w.N.). The order pursuant to § 31a para. 1 sentence 1 StVZO does not presuppose

[Name of company], at [place], plaintiff, authorized representative: mr. H.W.J. melting head, and the State Secretary for Economic Affairs and Climate (Telecom

easy to understand: see eg Thaler R and Sunstein C, Nudge: The Final Edition (2021), pp 36-38; Samuelson W and Zeckhauser R, “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making”

Administrative Court Decision date June 21, 2021 Business number W274 2237071-1 Saying W274 2237071-1 / 10E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative

the evidence procedure carried out: 1.1. On April 24, 2023, Mr. Sebastian W*** (Managing Director of B*** - hereinafter “GF”) submitted a security breach

of its partners (Business Promoter s.r.l.) by an agent of a sub-agency contracted by the latter (Top Solutions s.r.l.), confirming that the called number

Federal Administrative Court Decision date 08/26/2021 Business number W274 2242363-1 Saying W274 2242363-1 / 4E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative

the cases of the ECtHR Węgrzynowski and Smolczevski v. Poland and M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, and the case of SEU Camera di commercio, Industria, Artigianato

Administrative Court Decision date December 06, 2021 Business number W274 2243175-1 Saying W274 2243175-1 / 3E The Federal Administrative Court, through the

(BVwG 30.10.2019, W258 2218465-1; 30.10.2019, W258 2216873-1; BVwG 29.04. 2020, W274 2224945-1; 21.10.2020, W274 2232028-1; 26.02.2021, W258 2224155-1; 24

the browser. 1 S.3. about the use of cookies in the context of pseudonymous r ng, users are informed in this Data protectionMkUrung Informed 5.4 If you do

agreement concluded on May 5, 2014. Although the PESEL number of the defendant J. R. was used when concluding the agreement, but the indicated place of residence

Vienna Higher Regional Court as a court of appeal of April 26, 2021, GZ 11 R 51/21g-31, with which the judgment of the Vienna Regional Court for Civil Law

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA, rules on the appeal of Mag. XXXX , p. A. XXXX , represented

demonstration to a press representative: VG Würzburg, decision of February 13, 2015 – W 7 E 15.81, juris). According to Section 123 (1) VwGO, the court can issue an

2022 and December 14 December 2022 (access the URL: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_A***&oldid=*5*7**2). 4. The entry about the complainant

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the experts Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the appeal of XXXX ,

of a superior (cf. OVG NW, B.v. May 11, 2023 - 1 A 2432/20 - juris Rn. 11 m.w.N.). The documents in dispute mainly consist of events from the years 2004

for checking compliance with the provisions of the Stock Exchange Act , MiFI R and MAR standardized obligations can be made possible (as above, paragraph

of the accrued extrajudicial Business fee according to §§ 13, 14 No. 2300 W RVG in the amount of 711.03 euros plus 5 percentage points above exempt base

Paragraph 2 In connection with the construction of a nursing home in C-town in W-street X, the plaintiff commissioned the expert office of the second defendant

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the complaint of XXXX

principles of the so-called Stolpe case-law (BVerfG, order of 25 October 2005, 1 BvR 1696/98), which the plaintiff invokes in a written statement of 20 October

vicinity Train station in W... are the lawyers from the law firm G...-D... Rechtsanwälte... 35 https://www.rechtsanwalts-kanzlei-w....de/achten-agg-hoppe

not, the main Subject to legal proceedings (see OLG Karlsruhe 16.02.2011 - 4 W 108/10 - Rn.17) - 4 - a) In view of the specific circumstances of the individual

13/2005 DSG Art. 2 § 9 valid from January 1st, 2000 to March 31st, 2005 saying W274 2243598-1/10E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative Court

advice in order to be clarified. According to §§ 2 Para. 2, 13 RVG No. 2300 W RVG, the claim amounts to €1,029.35. Since the cross-appeal does not attack

with article 1034quinquies of the Ger.W. , or via the e-Deposit IT system of Justice (Article 32ter of the Ger.W.). (get). Hielke HIJMANS Chairman of the

of 28.04.2020 - 1 S 1068/20 -, and of 30.04.2020 - 1 S 1101/20 -, each m.w.N.). In view of this, the provision in Section 3 (1) sentence 3 CoronaVO on

Innsbruck Higher Regional Court as court of appeal of 22 August 2019, GZ 2 R 96/19p-36, thus reversing the judgment of the Regional Court Feldkirch of 9

www.bvwg.gv.at decision date 03.02.2022 business number W214 2224204-1/28E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, through

9 ff). for the use of a website requires prior consent (cf. Article 29 -, W, P, Opinion 04/2012 on Cookie Consent Exemption, WP 194, 00879/12/EN p. 9 ff)

December 1, 2018, rdb.at), see also BVwG November 23, 2020, W211 2227144-1; BVwG 8/13/2021, W211 2222613-1. But even with a direct applicability of Art.

for an amount of 2,175.00 euros and 2,713.00 euros. It also provides a CD-R containing the recording of the telephone conversation maintained with the

in: Zöller, code of civil procedure, 33rd edition 2020, § 56 ZPO, para. 8 m.w.N.). 31Since the authenticity of the document, by means of which the authorization

Reply to the CNPD. Cf. ibid. "Cf. information available on Elias /'Vor/dão r Ora/find-or4 and attached to the case file as Document "worldcoin - Data collection

plaintiff, but generally with the credit institutions according to §§ 675 v -675 w BGB. § 675 v BGB is the central liability standard in the legal relationship

no. 19 - 20, juris; differently, however, Senate, decision of 19.4.2021 - 4 W 243/21 -, juris). However, this can also be left aside here, because the risk

(BGH ruling of April 9, 2014 - VIII ZR 404/12 = BeckRS 2014 , 9743 Rn. 23 m.w.N.; Grüneberg/Grünberg, BGB commentary, 81st edition 2022, § 305 Rz. 4). In

organizing body above the school Z and the Vrij Centrum for it pupil guidance W, but since a CLB must be able to act independently, they appear to be acting

the matters mentioned in Section 28 WEG (cf. LGZ Graz December 15, 2006, 3 R 139/06t and within the meaning of Paragraph 29, Paragraph one, WEG, especially

decision of January 27, 2022 in the dispute value complaint proceedings (Az.: 15 W 55/21, Bl. 1649 f d.A.) - to be calculated from an object value of 5,000 euros

Constitutional Court of BW, decision of 22 January 2020 loc. cit., BA p. 15 m.w.n.). With regard to the scope of the resolution, an intentional discretion

Vienna Higher Regional Court as a court of appeal of January 18, 2021, GZ 11 R 188/20b Co KG in Vienna, for providing an Information in accordance with Article

2021 - 16 U 275/20, juris para. 69; KG, decision of February 2, 2021 - 9 W 1117/20, juris para. 44). 78 Such displacement of the claim from Art. 82 (1)

judgment Accused: Martin N ***, born on: 13.06.19 **, S *** straße 2 *, 1 *** W *** As the person responsible within the meaning of Art. 4 No. 7 of Regulation

(Implementation) Organisation Structure Act (SUWI), such as the UWV, SVB, B&W colleges, the Tax and Customs Administration and the SZW Inspectorate, and

authority data.nl Confidential/Registered Minister of Foreign Affairs Deheermr.W.B.HoekstraMBA Rijnstraat8 2515XPDenHaag Date Unidentified 24 February 2022

the Police Act 1996: see R (Miller) v College of Policing [2020] EWHC 255 (Admin); [2020] HRLR 10, para 102 and R (Officer W80) v Director General of the

Constitutional Court, judgment of December 15, 1983 - 1 BvR 209/83 -, juris, para. 150 f. m.w.N.; BVerwG, judgment of September 27, 2018 - 7 C 5.17 -, juris

enforcement of EU law - and thus also the DS-GVO (LG Munich I a.a.O. Rn. 41 with w.N.). 38 Based on the extent of the stolen personal data communicated to the

earlier and more accurately (BayVGH, B.v. March 7, 2022, a.a.O., Rn. 31 m.w.N. ). According to Article 24 Paragraph 4 Sentence 2 GO, only data that is

yours, either in its entirety or in the precise arrangement and composition r elements are generally known or readily accessible to those in the circles

(cf. Sachs, in: Sachs, Basic Law, 9th edition 2021, Art. 1, para. 52 ff. m.w.N.). In addition, the plaintiff is exercising her fundamental right to data

fifty thousand euros). 21 Yours faithfully, Dutch Data Protection Authority, w.g. mr.A.Wolfsen Chair 2The AP will hand over the aforementioned claim to the

2021, in addition to the parties to the present emergency application, Mr W. was also present as an expert for the Hessian Data Protection Commissioner

decision of July 4, 2019 - 7 C 31.17 - NVwZ-RR 2019, 1015 marginal number 24 with w. N.), the now deciding Senate does not maintain. The notion of "Fiscal Area"

507/15, VersR 2016, 1236; BGH, judgment of December 2, 2015 - IV ZR 28/15, VersR 2016, 173; BGH, judgment of . June 26, 2013 - IV ZR 39/10, VersR 2013, 1381)

of human rights of CAIXABANK because it limits itself to considering that “[w]hen the EDPB refers to to an "increase in commissions" it is evident that it

of February 10, 2023 - 8 O 177/22, GRUR-RS 2023, 2621 marginal number 77 m.w.N.).Abs. 91Recitals 75 and 85 list some possible damages, including identity

for more details. Ro 2021/04/0010-11 December 21, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Administrative Court has through the presiding Senate President

Vienna Higher Regional Court as Court of Appeal of 7 February 2019, GZ 133 R 113/18t-17, which partially confirmed and partially amended the judgment of

interests. With total clarity has ruled on this issue the STS of 06/20/2020 (R. cassation 1074/2019), whose sixth Legal Basis says, regarding one of the issues

observer should be used (OLG Stuttgart, decision of September 6th, 2018 - 4 W 63/18; printed in NJW-RR 2019, 35). In addition, the statement must not be

SATS eventually responded to all of such requests, although SATS replied 68r the first time 69 to Complainant No 4 – after a reminder from the complainant

activities. In the Guidelines on Transparency under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (W P 260 rev. 01), when the information to be provided on the Profiling refers

art. 6.3. 55C. DE TERWANGNE, The General Data Protection Regulation, p. 136; W. KOTSCHY, The EU General Data ProtectionRegulation (GDPR), p. 336. 56 GDPR