Search results

(Article 12 GDPR), information (Articles 13 and 14 GDPR), access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction

GDPR. Recital 71 sentence 1 GDPR. Recital 71 sentence 1 GDPR. Recital 28 sentence 1 GDPR, such as Hansen, in Simitis, Hornung, Spieker, Datenschutzrecht

BDSG, Article 6 GDPR, margin number 20 (C.H. Beck 2020). Recital 32 sentence 1 GDPR. Recital 32 sentence 2 GDPR. Recital 32 sentence 3 GDPR. CJEU, C‑673/17

protection against and prevention of dangers to the publicsafety."37. Recital 19 GDPR clarifies that there is a special regulation in force in this contextthe

of data established in Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, Article 9(2)(c) GDPR, Article 9(2)(g) GDPR and Article 9(2)(i) GDPR directly correlate with a specific legal

BDSG, Article 17 GDPR, margin number 53 (C.H. Beck 2020, 3rd Edition). Article 17(2) GDPR must be distinguished from Article 19 GDPR, which foresees the

under Article 6(4) GDPR and further processing for a compatible purpose under Article 6(4) GDPR. See the commentary on Article 6(4) GDPR for details on the

Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 32 GDPR, p. 636 (Oxford University Press 2020). Jandt, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 32 GDPR, margin number

dealt with in Article 12(6) GDPR. It is unclear why Article 12(2) GDPR refers to Articles 15 to 22 GDPR, while Article 11(2) GDPR only refers to Articles Articles

of Articles 13 or 14 GDPR and Article 15(1) GDPR often overlaps, the controller has a different obligation under Article 15 GDPR to include the ex-post

Article 83(8) GDPR corresponds in this respect to Recital 148 sentence 4 GDPR. Nemitz, in Ehmann,Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 83 GDPR, margin

(Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction (Article 18 GDPR), notification (Article 19 GDPR) or data portability

Article 35 GDPR, margin number 19 (C.H. Beck 2021, 39th edition). Kosta, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary

natural persons”. The GDPR does not define what constitutes a “risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons”. Recital 75 GDPR only outlines potential

for processing personal data for such personal or household activities. Recital 19: Not Applicable to Criminal Prosecution Activities The protection of natural

14(2)(g) and 15(1)(h) GDPR. Recital 50 GDPR. Dix, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 13 GDPR, margin number 20 (C.H

Berlin. If their behaviour is monitored by an app, the GDPR applies. In light of Recital 14 GDPR and the EDPB guidelines, the targeting criterion covers

Article 14 GDPR gives expression to the principle of transparency enshrined in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and further defined in Article 12 GDPR. While Article

purposes outlined in Article 23(1)(a) to (j) GDPR (e.g. national and public security) as well as Recital 73 GDPR (e.g. protection of human life). In any case

Article 25 GDPR or Article 32 GDPR. This provision assigns a proactive role to the controller who has to ensure compliance with the GDPR at all stages

out data relating to deceased persons, this Recital confirms Recital 27 GDPR, according to which the GDPR “does not apply to the personal data of deceased

Regulation (GDPR), Article 7 GDPR, p. 350 (Oxford University Press 2020). Heckmann, Paschke, in Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 7 GDPR, margin

22(2)(c) GDPR. Finally, decisions based on explicit consent are also subjected to the safeguards laid down in Article 22(3) GDPR. Article 22(3) GDPR lays down

in other parts of the GDPR. To begin with, Recital 141 GDPR clarifies that an SA must “act on a complaint”. Article 57(1)(f) GDPR, in turns, establishes

Article 82 GDPR – like almost all provisions of the GDPR – is directly applicable in all Member States without any act of implementation. Article 82 GDPR leaves

since, under Article 28(1) GDPR, a controller shall only use processors providing the same standards under Article 25 GDPR. Manufacturers or producers

Article 57 GDPR (tasks of SAs), Article 58 GDPR (powers of SAs), as well as Article 65 GDPR (dispute resolution by the board), Article 63 GDPR (consistency

You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 36 GDPR Recital 89 GDPR. Article 36 GDPR must therefore be read as one   element within a wider framework

the meaning Recital 86 GDPR). However, Article 34 GDPR does not provide a specific deadline of 72 hours as is the case in Article 33 GDPR. Instead, timelines

the scope of the LED from the scope of the GDPR. Article 10 GDPR is intended to extend the protection of the GDPR to the processing of certain criminal data

resolution mechanism under Article 65 GDPR in connection with Article 63 GDPR is triggered (Article 60 (4) GDPR). Article 60(2) GDPR clarifies that also in cross-border

provisions of the GDPR require the controller to keep track of individual recipients. For example, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR and Article 19 GDPR require the disclosure

situation, Article 95 GDPR will not be relevant, and the GDPR applies as normal. Notably, Recital 173 GDPR, which relates to Article 95 GDPR, omits reference

(Articles 55-59 GDPR). The GDPR provides for exceptions from provisions entailed in Chapter VI (independent supervisory authorities). Article 85(2) GDPR mandates

Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 27 GDPR, pp. 595-596 (Oxford University Press 2020). Recital 80 sentence 5 GDPR. Ziebarth, in Sydow,

important to note that Article 13(1)(f) GDPR, Article 14(1)(f) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR and Article 15(2) GDPR, make specific reference to transfers of personal

purpose (Article 52(4)(5)(6) GDPR). Elements of SAs' complete independence are also addressed in Article 53 GDPR and Article 54 GDPR. The CJEU in the Case of

exists only in cases of Article 64(2) GDPR but not the context of Article 70(2) GDPR. According to Article 70(3) GDPR, the EDPB is obligated to “forward its

personal data as well (see Recital 163 GDPR). Tosoni in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 98 GDPR, p. 1315 (Oxford University

from any of the GDPR’s protections. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 39 GDPR Just as Article 38 GDPR, Article 39 GDPR also shows similarities

Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 55 GDPR, page 909 (Oxford University Press 2020). See Recital 20 GDPR and CJEU, in C-245/20 - Autoriteit

consideration when the GDPR was drafted. There is consequently no need to 'balance' the GDPR against other rights for a second time, as the GDPR is already the

to Article 60 GDPR, Article 61 GDPR, Article 62 GDPR, Article 63 GDPR, Article 64 GDPR, Article 65 GDPR, Article 66 GDPR and Article 56 GDPR. The SA is also

Category:Article 86 GDPR At para. 120 Kranenborg, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 86 GDPR, p. 1216 (Oxford University

5(1)(d) GDPR gives the controller some leeway to continue processing inaccurate data - see more details under Article 5(1)(d) GDPR. Article 16 GDPR, titled

Article 79 GDPR, margin number 14 (rdb.at 2018). Jahnel in Jahnel, DSGVO, Article 79 GDPR, margin number 29 (Jan Sramek 2021). See Recital 141 GDPR. Moos,

application of Article 65(1)(a) GDPR, (13 April 2021), margin number 57 (available here). See also Recital 143 GDPR. See Article 78(2) GDPR. Hijmans, in Kuner et

(Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), deletion (Article 17 GDPR), restriction of processing (Article 18 GDPR), objection (Article 21 GDPR) and the

catalogue of penalties in Article 83 GDPR. National legislators may add provisions to fill these gaps. Under Recital 152 GDPR, these provisions may either be

under the GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 94 GDPR Kühling, Raab, in Kühling, Buchner, GVO BDSG, Article 94 GDPR, margin numbers

offered to them under Article 66 GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 66 GDPR CJEU, C-645/19, 15 June 2021, Facebook Ireland,

SAs' tasks, please refer to Article 57 GDPR and for their powers please refer to Article 58 GDPR. See Recital 122 GDPR. In this respect, reference should be

Article 45(5) GDPR (revocation, change of such determinations); Articles 46(2)(c) and (d) GDPR (standard protection clauses); Article 47(3) GDPR (formats and

in the GDPR’, 07 July 2021 (Version 2.1), p. 19 (available here). EDPB, ‘Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR’, 07

interpreted Recital 144 GDPR to have limited the scope of Article 81 GDPR, as applying only to proceedings instigated under Article 78 GDPR. The first sentence

88(1) GDPR) and a conditional function (Article 88(2) GDPR). While Article 88(2) GDPR determines the scope of the opening clause, Article 88(1) GDPR establishes

57 GDPR should be deemed inadmissible for the purposes of Article 31 GDPR. Article 31 GDPR can be read as a supporting provision to Article 58 GDPR. In

Article 23(1)(e) GDPR, which sets out strict requirements for the Union or Member State's law restricting GDPR rights, Article 18(2) GDPR does not make any

proposed amendments to the GDPR (pursuant to Article 70(1)(b) GDPR). Although not explicitly mentioned in Article 69(2) GDPR, the requirement that the Board

Category:Article 45 GDPR Kuner, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 45 GDPR, p. 774 (Oxford

decision pursuant to Article 45 GDPR shall be used, when it exists; second, appropriate safeguards under Article 46 GDPR, such as binding corporate rules

→ See Article 23 GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 19 GDPR. The obligation to notify under Article 19 should not be confused

Although Article 40(5) GDPR mentions that the competent DPA will be determined through the application of Article 55 GDPR, the GDPR does not provide concrete

Articles 13 or 14 GDPR. This can be drawn from the final sentence of Article 11(1) GDPR. It must be assessed with the utmost attention whether GDPR provisions

published under Article 70(3) GDPR. Though Article 70(3) GDPR already obliges the EDPB to make these public, Article 71(2) GDPR ensures that the public is

Article 72 GDPR regulates the Board's voting procedure. Generally, the GDPR grants the EDPB a high degree of autonomy. In particular, Article 72(2) GDPR entitles

large-scale, or involve processing of data under Article 9 GDPR or Article 10 GDPR. Recital 97 GDPR clarifies that the core activities of a controller are

Article 62 GDPR, margin number 11 (Beck 2018, 2nd edition). Riccio, Scorza, Belisario, GDPR e normativa privacy – Commentario, Article 62 GDPR (Wolters Kluwer

subject to the GDPR or, in cases where they are not established in the EU, act within the material and territorial scope of the GDPR. Article 48 GDPR refers to

true also under Article 91 GDPR”. See, Tosoni, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 91 GDPR, p. 1263 (Oxford University

provisions of the GDPR. This decision refers to the Administrative cooperation between SAs (covering cooperation under Articles 56, 60, 61 and 62 GDPR) and the

authority. Article 61(1) GDPR regulates how independent authorities are to cooperate to enable the uniform application of the GDPR. Supervisory authorities

directly to children. As such, Article 8 GDPR stipulates additional requirements for consent by children. Article 8 GDPR applies only if the processing of data

Article 46(2)(d) GDPR, contractual clauses referred to in Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, or binding corporate rules within the meaning of Article 47 GDPR. In these cases

differences between portability and access under Article 15(3) GDPR. According to Recital 68, the data should be available in an "interoperable format"

of knowledge between them. This way, Article 50 GDPR expands the exhortation under Article 57(1)(g) GDPR that calls for cooperation between EU DPAs, across

outlined under other Articles of the GDPR, namely in Articles 51, 52 and 53 GDPR. The second objective, under Article 54(2) GDPR, seeks to regulate the confidentiality

provisions under Article 75(3) GDPR. The employees of the Board's secretariat only report to the Chair (Recital 140 GDPR). In this respect, they are therefore

exclusion of Article 82 GDPR is confirmed by the last sentence of Recital 142 GDPR. In addition, Article 80(2) GDPR does not permit Member States to allow NPOs

prevention (Article 23(1)(a-j) GDPR) allow for far fewer GDPR restrictions than those granted by freedom of expression. Article 85(2) GDPR poses one condition for

decisions pursuant to Article 65 GDPR (Article 70(1)(t) GDPR). Article 68 GDPR is the first of nine Articles (Articles 68-76 GDPR) governing the EDPB set forth

It shall apply from 25 May 2018. There is no relevant recital for Article 99 GDPR. Article 99 GDPR sets out the dates of the Regulation's entry into force

with Article 58(1) GDPR. Article 90 GDPR was drafted with a view to regulate potential conflicts between the application of the GDPR on the one hand, and

compliance with the GDPR under Article 58(2)(d) GDPR or even ban it under Article 58(2)(f) GDPR. Therefore, complaints under Article 77 GDPR should extend to

relevance of Article 29 GDPR were rooted in the fact that Article 28(3)(b) GDPR already seems to cover much of the scope of Article 29 GDPR. More specifically

Article 96 GDPR if it is found to be incompatible with other GDPR provisions. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 96 GDPR It follows

mentioned in Recital 167 GDPR and Article 291 TFEU, the aim of implementing acts is to “ensure uniform conditions for implementing” the GDPR. In its GDPR Certification

between Article 42(1) GDPR and Article 42(2) GDPR is that in the former, the applicant for certification is subject to the GDPR, while in latter, the applicant

in Category:Article 74 GDPR For more on this point, see Article 72 GDPR. Dix in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 74 GDPR, margin number 7 (C.H. Beck

76 GDPR, margin number 1 (C.H. Beck 2020, 3rd edition). Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 76 GDPR, p

of the GDPR enforcement across the Member States. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 64 GDPR Caspar in Kühling, Buchner, GDPR Article

compliance with the GDPR. Article 28(3)(h) GDPR enables such a task in case processors are used. According to Article 28(3)(h) GDPR, the processor should

undertakings”, following Article 4(19) GDPR, is constituted by “a controlling undertaking and its controlled undertakings”. The GDPR, however, does not define what

majority principle under Article 72(1) GDPR would have applied regardless of Article 73(1) GDPR. In addition, the GDPR explicitly legislates for a simple majority

of the European Union ("TFEU"), within the scope of the GDPR. The function of Article 92 GDPR is to lay down conditions for the delegation of power as

Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 38 GDPR, p. 707 (Oxford University Press 2020). Bergt, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 38 GDPR, margin number

progress. Fill in the name used for the recital if you use it so we can ensure a somewhat streamlined practice. Recital 1: The protection of natural persons

when passing the GDPR. In fact, all but one EU Member State (who has sought higher protections) have voted in favor the GDPR. The GDPR is not just consisting

per Article 45(3) GDPR, and subject to regular reporting, which Article 97(2) GDPR provides for. The third paragraph of Article 97 GDPR, obliges the Commission

enforcement of the GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 59 GDPR Selmayr, in Ehmann, Selmayr, DS-GVO Kommentar, Article 59 GDPR, margin number

data subject has under Articles 16, 17(1) and 18 GDPR. The Court also made reference to Recital 10 GDPR and Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Right

undefined in the GDPR. “Expertise” is only referred to again under Article 41(2)(a) GDPR, although briefly. Additionally, Article 41(1) GDPR specifies that

data under Article 4(1) GDPR, especially because they allow to single out a data subject within the meaning of recital 26 of the GDPR. It is sufficient that

6(1)(a) GDPR Example: Not Art. 6 Abs 1 Lit a GDPR or Article 6 GDPR or GDPR Article 6, Sec 1(a) Recitals are also not shortened. Example: Recital 47 Example:

same applies to the right to erasure under Article 17 of the GDPR. Recital 63 of the GDPR also supports this view. It shows that the legislator wants to

of Chapter V GDPR. The complaint was transferred to the Swedish DPA in its quality of lead supervisory authority pursuant to Article 56 GDPR. Following the

information to be communicated must be based on recital 63 of the GDPR. According to recital 63 sentence 1 of the GDPR, the data subject’s right to information

of Chapter V GDPR. The complaint was transferred to the Swedish DPA in its quality of lead supervisory authority pursuant to Article 56 GDPR. Following the

Article 46 GDPR. In 2020, noyb lodged a complaint with the Austrian DPA alleging that the controller breached the provisions of Chapter V GDPR. The complaint

complaint in accordance with Article 78, second paragraph, of the GDPR and recital 141 of the GDPR. Has the defendant observed the reasonable period in handling

laid down in the GDPR, so that the general conditions for claims were decisive, unless the GDPR contained special rules; even under the GDPR, only non-material

understood as made to the GDPR, in accordance with article 94 of the last. Likewise, it is apparent from recital 173 of the GDPR that this text explicitly

should be well-known to everyone that the GDPR provides enhanced protection to sensitive data. Article 10 of the GDPR refers to these data collections which

of Chapter V GDPR. The complaint was transferred to the Swedish DPA in its quality of lead supervisory authority pursuant to Article 56 GDPR. Following the

Article 32 GDPR? 4) Does Article 82(3) GDPR allow the controller to be exempt from liability for damages if the data breach as defined by 4(12) GDPR was caused

justification or basis for the processing, violating Article 9 GDPR. AEPD highlighted that Recital 46 GDPR already recognizes that, in exceptional situations, such

an access request under Article 15(1) GDPR. According to Recital 63 GDPR, the right of access under Article 15 GDPR serves data subjects to be informed about

to Article 83 GDPR in conjunction with Article 4 No. 7 and 8 GDPR, fines for violations of the GDPR pursuant to Article 83(4) to (6) GDPR are not only to

on detecting in the letter received on 15/02/19, an alteration in the data provided. Thus, on 06/03/19, the claimed entity sent a letter to this Agency

regarding Articles 5(1)(b) GDPR and 5(1)(e) GDPR and held that national courts had to determine, using the factors of Article 6(4) GDPR, whether further processing

situation is warranted. In this respect, Recital 137 GDPR states 65 66See Article 77 GDPR. See Recital 137 GDPR. 28that an urgent need to act in order to

Article 17(1)(d) GDPR since the data was unlawfully processed. The defendant claimed that its activities fall under exception in (Article 85 GDPR) read in conjunction

norm addressee of Chapter V GDPR. The bB be directly responsible for BF2, which violated Art. 44 ff GDPR. Regarding The GDPR is applicable to the processing

Must Articles 77(1) and 79(1) GDPR be interpreted as meaning that the administrative appeal provided for in Article 77 GDPR constitutes an instrument for

to access under Article 15 GDPR because the controller was entitled to reject the request pursuant to Article 12(5)(b) GDPR. The court reasoned that this

violations of the provisions of the GDPR. It should be borne in mind here that recital 146 sentence 3 of the GDPR requires a broad interpretation in order

Federal Court of Justice (judgments of December 16, 2020 - IV ZR 294/19 - and IV ZR 314/19 - juris) requires notification of the relevant reasons for the reassessment

Article 32 GDPR. Retaining personal data of an applicant for a lease after another applicant has been selected also violates Article 5(1)(e) GDPR. The customer

asserted here and based on Article 82 of the GDPR, appears questionable in view of sentence 3 of recital 146 of the GDPR. In the case in dispute, however, no damage

as “anonymisation”. Recital 26 of the GDPR clarifies that anonymous information does not fall within the scope of the GDPR. The GDPR does not explicitly

Article 17(3) GDPR. Two doctors sued a platform for deletion of their basic profile set up on the platform without their consent under Article 17 GDPR. They argued

laid down in the GDPR, so that the general conditions for claims were decisive, unless the GDPR contained special rules; even under the GDPR, only non-material

performance of this purchase contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR). Therefore, the processing is compatible with the GDPR. In the Netherlands, as of 1 July 2018 a passenger

according to the first sentence of recital 41 of the GDPR, a legal basis, on which (the here relevant) Art. 9(2)(i) of the GDPR is based, does not necessarily

e) of the GDPR). 8.1.4. As for breaches of Articles 5.2. and 24 of the GDPR 88. Article 24.1 of the GDPR which covers Chapter IV of the GDPR devoted to

of the GDPR according to Art. 99 Para. 2 GDPR as of May 25, 2018 follows from Art. 79 Para. 2 Sentence 1 GDPR in conjunction with recital 22 GDPR as well

15(1)(h) of the GDPR, the right of data subjects to object under Article 21(1)(1)(2) of the GDPR and - in essence - in Article 22 of the GDPR as a general

causality between the "GDPR breach" and the "damage". Article 82(1) GDPR requires that the damage occurs as a result of a specific GDPR breach. Although it

gather valid consent in line with the GDPR? In building its argumentation, the DPA also relied on Recital 32 GDPR, as well as paragraph 62 of the CJEU Planet49

Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. The Finish DPA further ordered the controller to bring its processing activities into compliance under Article 58(2)(d) GDPR. The controller

administrative sanction to be imposed, we should read certain recitals of the RGPD, among others, recital 148, which indicates the following: 'In order to strengthen

compliance and accountability according to Article 5(1) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR and Article 6(1) GDPR. Since the company had totally ignored the its compliance

plaintiff pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR, since there have been violations of Article 6(1)(a) GDPR and Article 34 GDPR. The defendant also breached the obligation

serious breach of the GDPR. The violation of Article 17, 1., a) constitutes also a violation of an essential principle of the GDPR and constitutes at least

principle enclosed in Article 5(1)(b) GDPR. On this matter, the AEPD argued that, according to Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Recital 39 and Article 6(1)(f), an interest

point (g) of GDPR and 13 par. 1 point g. 4624/2019, and to exercise respectively the powers conferred on it by the provisions of Articles 58 GDPR and 15 Law

1 lit. f GDPR (for the protection of the processor's legitimate interests)? Right to erasure (Art. 17 GDPR); right to object (Art. 21 GDPR)? Locations

the coronavirus COVID-19 limit. 15Ministerial decree of 28 October 2020 on urgent measures to limit the spread of coronavirus COVID-19. limit. Decision on

ones processing. Decision on the merits 07/2021 - 14/25 10 recital 50 GDPR. Recital 50 of the GDPR states that this is a separate legal basis required for

Schleswig- Holstein), paragraphs 56 and 57 and C-645/19 (Facebook Belgium), paragraphs 91 and 93. 14C-645/19 (Facebook Belgium), paragraphs 92 to 95. Page 9

5(1)(a) GDPR? Is the information relating to personal data processing operations easily accessible within the meaning of Articles 12 and 13 GDPR? Is the

Article 6.1 GDPR, read in conjunction with Articles 5.2 GDPR and 24.1 GDPR; 5) the performance of a data protection impact assessment (Article 35 GDPR) the framework

Article 9(2)(j) GDPR could be a legal basis for scientific research purporses or statistical purposes. Lastly, Recital 46 of the GDPR specifically mentions

prohibition of processing sensitive data under Article 9(2)? Were there any other GDPR violations incurred by the processing? The DPA held that there was no lawful

whether Art. 15 GDPR applies to the investigation files at all, since according to Art. 2 Para. 2 d GDPR, Section 2a Para. 4 AO, the GDPR does not apply

provide sufficient information to verify the data subject's identity? Recital 64 of the GDPR states that the data controller should take all reasonable steps

(4) to (6) GDPR, the European legislator obviously had supranational antitrust law as a model. This is expressed in recital 150 of the GDPR, for example

707/19 - juris marginal 14; OVG NW, B.v. 16.1.2020 - 15 B 814/19 - juris marginal 31 et seq.; left open by OVG RP, B.v. 15.1.2020 - 10 B 11634/19 - juris

protection rules, 18 the GDPR itself provides for a 19 system of administrative fines for the entire Union (art.83 GDPR). The GDPR has the national procedural

2019 that it was operating. Following Article 83(5)(a)GDPR, read in the lights of Recital (148) GDPR, the AEPD issued a reprimand to the owner of the video

time, which is a violation of the GDPR. As to the claim for damages, the CoS notes that though Article 82(1) of the GDPR states that full compensation for

the ordering process. Judgment of 09.11.2021, 10 A 502/19, ECLI: DE: VGHANNO: 2021: 1109.10A502.19.00Art 5 EUV 2016/679, Art 6 EUV 2016/679 Tenor The proceedings

under Article 6(1) GDPR. In light of this, the DPA issued a fine of €70,000 to másLUZ Energía (SIE) by virtue of Article 83(5) GDPR for unlawful processing

understood as made to the GDPR , in accordance with Article 94 of the latter. Similarly, it appears from recital 173 of the GDPR that this text explicitly

of the concept of personal data Article 4, 1) of the GDPR, as explained in Recital 26 of the GDPR, Opinion 4/2007 of the Decision on the merits 71/2020

is subject’ (recital 45 of the preamble to the GDPR). (P. 85) (…) The basis of processing data, referred to in Article 6(1)(c) of the GDPR, is the processing

compensation, as laid down in Article 82 of the GDPR, should be taken into account recital 146 of the preamble to the GDPR. It states, inter alia, that the controller

with the principles of the GDPR, in particular that of lawfulness, by violating the provisions of Articles 6 and 5(1)(a) GDPR. Share your comments here

the principles of Article 5 GDPR is not cured by the existence of a legitimate purpose and legal basis (cf. GDPR 38/2004, GDPR 43/2019). In addition, the

es 28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 4/19 FUNDAMENTALS OF LAW Yo By virtue of the powers that article 58.2 of the GDPR recognizes to each control authority

understood. Article 15 of the GDPR belongs to Chapter III of the GDPR, entitled "The rights of the data subject". Recital 11 in the preamble states that

object under Article 21(2) GDPR in conjunction with Article 12(1) GDPR, Article 12(2) GDPR, Article 13 GDPR and Article 14 GDPR. Telenet asked for permission

Charter. 61 First, it should be noted that, in the light of recital 19 of the GDPR and recitals 9 to 12 of Directive 2016/680 and by virtue of Article 2(1)

regard on that article 2.1) GDPR read in conjunction with recital 15 of the GDPR, although an exclusion from the scope of the GDPR provides for files or a

17 of the AVG) are included below. Recital 59 of the GDPR further clarifies the standard in Article 12 of the GDPR: Arrangements should be made available

1307 marginal no. 32 - nickel-free; judgment of 19 March 2015 - I ZR 94/13, GRUR 2015, 1129 marginal no. 19 = WRP 2015, 1326 - hotel rating portal). According

proceedings”, that “Recital 65 of the GDPR also includes the exception of the legal defense as provided for in article 17.3.e of the GDPR to the right to erasure"

member states is superimposed (see Recital 146 S 4 and 5 on the GDPR; cf. also Frenzel in Paal / Pauly, GDPR-BDSG3 Art 82 GDPR margin no.1; Wybitul / Haß / Albrecht

with regard to personal data deceased persons, the GDPR does not apply (see Recital 27 of the GDPR), the Authority further noted that with regard to the

operations, it is necessary to fall back on article 6.1. AVG and recital 50 GDPR. Recital 50 of the GDPR states that this is a separate legal basis required for

LPACAP), for the alleged infringement of Article 6.1 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR. SEVENTH: Notification of the aforementioned initiation

such data. 2 Recital 3. 3 Recital 5. 3 b. the rapid technological developments which have occurred during a period of globalisation.4 As Recital (6) explains:

17(2) and 19 GDPR; h. to revoke a certification, or order the certification body to revoke a certification issued under Articles 42 and 43 GDPR, or order

therefore violated Articles 9(1) GDPR out of negligence. The DPA fined the controller €1,600,000 pursuant of Article 83(5)(a) GDPR and considered this a high

through the consistency and cooperation procedure under Chapter VII of the GDPR. Complaint 1 from Austria concerned the fact that Klarna took more than 5

the provisions of the GDPR, in particular Article 5 (1) GDPR, article 24 and article 28 GDPR, all this based on article 58.2, d) GDPR and article 100, §1

Article 16 sentence 1 GDPR is the legal basis for a request for rectification, even if the request has been submitted before the GDPR entered into force:

from the preamble to the GDPR that the GDPR aims to provide natural persons with a consistent and high level of protection (recital 10). This may indicate

transparency), Article 12(1), Article 7, Article 13 and Article 14 GDPR, the corresponding GDPR recitals (32, 39, 42, 47, 58, 60, 61, and 72), as well are Articles

provisions of the GDPR that are directly applicable do not supersede the provisions of the VStG and to the extent that Art. 83 (8) GDPR and recital 148 are ordered

subject in breach of the GDPR. The Court explained that the loss of control over your personal data is a form of damage (Recital 85 GDPR). It also considered

violation of Articles 12 and 13 GDPR? Did Nestor fail to respect the exercises of the right of access in violation of Article 15 GDPR? Did Nestor fail to satisfy

[The equivalent GDPR Article to Article 48(3)(a) EU GDPR is Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, and Article 50(1)(d) EU GDPR is Article 49(1)(d) GDPR.] Share blogs or

the Google Analytics framework constituted personal data. It cited Recital 30 GDPR to establish that online identifiers (e.g. IP addresses, information

5(1)(b) and (e), 9(2)(j), 89(1) GDPR and Section 7(1)(1) and (2)(1) GDPR. In particular, it follows from Article 9(2)(j) GDPR that the processing of data relating

article 12, second paragraph, of the GDPR. 78. Recital 59 of the GDPR further clarifies the standard in Article 12 of the GDPR: “There should be arrangements

constitutes personal data, and is thus the scope of the GDPR. In accordance with recital 59 of the GDPR, the controller should be obliged to respond to requests

6.1.f) GDPR) and in this balancing the considerations of the GDPR related to Art. 6.1.f) GDPR eligible [...] be taken, in particular Recital 47. Thus

para. of the GDPR, the law or regulation that constitutes the legal basis referred to in letters c) and e) of co. 1 of art. 6 of the GDPR, could contain

understood as references to the GDPR, in accordance with Article 94 of the latter. 34. Similarly, it follows from recital 173 of the GDPR that this text explicitly

reprimand concerning the requirements for consent as required by Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. Datatilsynet examined a complaint regarding the processing of personal data

according to Art 15 Paragraph 1 GDPR, such as the origin of the data. In accordance with Art 15 (4) GDPR and Recital 63 GDPR, the information must be restricted

from its database. The litigation chamber concluded to a violation of the GDPR considering that: - the controller did not stop the sending of direct marketing

controller, to correct its data processing practice in accordance with the GDPR. This decision does not assess the activities of the police in relation to

Article 82 (1) and (2) GDPR, any person who has suffered material or non-material damage as a result of a violation of the GDPR is entitled to compensation

meaning of the GDPR, and such processing of personal data did not fall within the scope of the "household exemption". Therefore, the GDPR applied in full

annex to the record. 11. On 19 October 2021 the Dispute Resolution Chamber receives some comments from the Respondent 11. On 19 October 2021 the Disputes

Article 17 GDPR (cf. Article 17 (3) b GDPR). In that case, the data subject does not have the right to object as referred to in Article 21 GDPR, because

morespecifically the articulation between article 15.4 of the GDPR and recital 63 of the GDPR, as well asbalancing the right to access and obtain data against

quarantine constitute personal data within the meaning of the provisions of the GDPR? The DPA held that, information on: the name of the city, street name, building

omission of TOMs (Art. 32 GDPR) The requirements of the European fundamental rights, which the GDPR in accordance with Art. 1 Para. 2 GDPR therefore suggest that

of Article 9 GDPR. In the DSB held that the processing violated Articles 5, 6 and 9 GDPR: Consent under Articles 6(1)(a), 7 and 9(2)(a) GDPR cannot be considered

of Article 5.1.c) of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of theRGPD. FIFTH: Consulted the database of this Agency on 02/18/19 it has not beenreceived any

protection of Art. 82 GDPR does not cover violations of Art. 13, 14, 15, 24, 25 and Art. 34 GDPR. In addition, there is no breach of the GDPR by the defendant

the infringement of its collaboration duties as per Article 58(2) of the GDPR. The decision is the consequence of a complaint submitted by a Spanish citizen

of access under Article 15 GDPR? By denying the complainant access, did the respondent infringe Articles 12(1) or 12(2) GDPR? The NAIH that the complainant's

under the household exception found in Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. According to this provision, the GDPR does not apply to the processing of personal data by natural

the sanctioning regime imposed by the GDPR. And this is because the GDPR is a closed and complete system. The GDPR is a European standard directly applicable

of the general information duty included in Article 13 GDPR. Is this a violation of Article 13 GDPR? The AEPD held that there had been a violation of Article

breach (Article 32 GDPR). Does the plaintiff have a right to compensation according to Article 82(1) GDPR and does Article 82(3) GDPR stipulate a reversal

for the year, thus violating Article 39(1)(b) GDPR regarding the DPO's duties to monitor compliance with GDPR. In view of those violations, the CNPD: imposed

of Art. 9 GDPR do not apply because the plaintiff did not seek to process that kind of data. The legality is thus determined by Art. 6 GDPR. In the absence

information.” Recitals 39 and 60 of the GDPR help to specify the scope of the right of information that is given to the interested parties. Recital 39 establishes:

which it is up to him to implement (article5.1.a) of the GDPR - explained in recital 39 of the GDPR). Different consequencesarising from one or the other

2016/679 (RGPD). Thus, dated 10/18/19, an informative request is addressed to the claimed person. THIRD: On 11/07/19, this Agency receives a letter from

a certain threshold, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, does not fall under the scope of the GDPR when there is no further storing, processing or

storage was in accordance with Art 4(11) GDPR. 2. Whether the obtained consent fulfils the conditions under Art 7 GDPR, especially the conditions for withdrawing

retention of personal data must therefore be as short as possible. According to recital 39 of the General Data Protection Regulation, personal data should only

corrective measures as per Article 58(2) GDPR, and that, although there was a violation of Articles 5(1)(a) and (e) GDPR, “the circumstances referred to above

Article 77(1) GDPR and subsequently the right of judicial remedy against the supervisory authority under Article 78(1) GDPR. Article 79 (1) GDPR provides for

Decision pursuant to Article 60 under 2023-01-19 the General Data Protection Date of translation: 2023-01-19 Regulation – If Skadeförsäkring AB Decision

notification system for adverse events. As emphasised in recital 76 of Regulation 2016/679 (the recitals contain a justification for the provisions of the operative

violation of Article 12 GDPR ? Are the following practices an infringement on data subjects' information right as described in Article 12 GDPR ? Spreading the

processing. Under Article 36(5) GDPR, the Italian Ministry of Health has submitted the Data Protection Impact Assessment of the "Covid-19 Alert System" (and its

Article 77 GDPR was very clear and limited in scope. However, the DSB went on to assert a violation of Article 12 GDPR and Article 15(1)(h) GDPR, acting beyond

via letter as well. According to the BVwG, this is in line with recital 63 of the GDPR ("Where possible, the controller should be able to provide remote

Article 32 GDPR? - Does the fact that this health data is not encrypted constitute a breach of the security obligation under Article 32 GDPR? - Does the

__________ COMPANY GOOGLE LLC __________ Session of June 12, 2020 Reading of 19 June 2020 __________ FRENCH REPUBLIC ON BEHALF OF THE FRENCH PEOPLE The Council

9(2)(a) GDPR and Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. Thus, the Danish DPA held that the processing was also not following the principles of Article 5(1) GDPR. Against

36 GDPR) regarding the compliance of the envisaged processing with the GDPR. According to the Commission, the legal basis was Article 6(1)(e) GDPR, as

controller for the purposes of Article 4(7) GDPR, and Company A was the processor for the purposes of Article 4(8) GDPR. The DPA found that both Companies A and

data that the Service inspection team asked him to check it out. 8. On June 19, 2019, the Inspection Service sent a letter to the Data Protection Officer

article 5.1.f) of the GDPR, typified in article 83.5 of the GDPR, a warning sanction and for a violation of article 32 of the GDPR, typified in article

with article 24 GDPR. They are contained in article 25 of the AVG mentioned above and are explained in more detail in recital 78 GDPR. The defendant therefore

to information under Article 15 of the GDPR, especially since it can be deduced from recitals 9 and 10 of the GDPR that the European legislator did not intend

accurate and lawfully processed (see recital 63 GDPR). Automated decision-making and profiling 4.8. Pursuant to Article 22 GDPR, [applicants] have the right,

activities of SPARTOO SAS did not comply with a series of GDPR provisions (art. 5§1(c), 5§1(e), 13, 32 GDPR). In that respect, CNIL imposed a fine of 250,000 euros

the ePrivacy Directive and Articles 6(1)(a) and 7 GDPR, in the lights of Article 4(11) and Recital 32 GDPR. Following this report, the GBA issued a decision

under Article 21 GDPR can be made at any time and several times. It also found that a provisional measure can be granted under Article 21 GDPR if an urgent

data subject under Article 21(1) GDPR had been violated by the PAR. Did Mrs AAA have a right to object under Article 21 GDPR? Had the PAR infringed this right