Search results

91/1, 91 / 1-1, 91/2. ZP-1 Article 2, 2/2, 136, 136/1, 136 / 1-1. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016

here). More precise, Article 13(1)(e) GDPR, Article 14(1)(e) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR. Klabunde, in Ehmann, Selmayr, DS-GVO, Article 4 GDPR, margin number

principles in Article 5 of Convention 108 from 1981. Following this tradition, Article 5 GDPR is also largely consistent with Article 6(1) of the previous

assess a possible "legitimate interest" under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Equally to Article 6(1)(c) GDPR, Article 6(2) and (3) GDPR require that Union or Member

requirements from Article 9(2) and Article 9 (3) GDPR, but will also require an additional concomitant legal basis contained in Article 6(1) GDPR. However

proportionality, enshrined in EU primary law in Article 5(4) TEU and Article 52(1)(2) CFR, is also reflected in Article 83(1) GDPR. In general, a measure is proportionate

make contact with him' (BVerwG, NJW 2006, 3367ff.)”. Article 1(1) in conjunction with Article 2(1) Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and

purpose(s) (Article 5(1)(b)); lawfulness of processing (Article 6); adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary data (Article 5(1)(c)); limited

and controllers. If Article 28 GDPR did not intend any privilege, the rules of Article 28 GDPR, and in particular of Article 28(10) GDPR, would be superfluous

individual rights. These criteria have the same meaning as in Article 24(1) and Article 32(1). The "nature" of the processing consists of its “the inherent

dispute resolution mechanism under Article 65 GDPR in connection with Article 63 GDPR is triggered (Article 60 (4) GDPR). Article 60(2) GDPR clarifies that also

Commentary, Article 10 GDPR, p. 388 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2020). Schiff, in Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 10 GDPR, margin

the reliance on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR or at least exercise the right to object under Article 21 GDPR. If the legal basis is Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (i.e. 'legitimate

further details see Article 14(1)(d) GDPR. Similar to the ex-ante information in Article 13(1)(e) and 14(1)(e) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR requires the

91/1, 91 / 1-1, 91/2. ZP-1 Article 2, 2/2, 136, 136/1, 136 / 1-1. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016

to access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction (Article 18 GDPR), notification (Article 19 GDPR) or

protection of personal data in Greece is constitutionally established in Article 9A of the Greek Constitution. You can help us filling this section! As an

draw up. Indeed, the wording of Article 40(1) establishes that they “shall encourage” this (emphasis added). Article 40(1) GDPR clarifies that codes of conduct

GDPR (Article 31 GDPR). Direct liability of the representative is limited to the obligations set out in Article 30 and Article 58(1)(a) GDPR. Article 27(5)

remedies. CJEU: The CJEU has clarified in C-132/21 that "Article 77(1), Article 78(1) and Article 79(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 [...] must be interpreted

(e.g. Article 25 (1) and (2), Article 28(1), Article 32(1) GDPR, Article 89(1) GDPR). These measures can also be regarded as measures under Article 24(1)

surveillance cameras, it was therefore in breach of Article 37(1)(b) GDPR by not having a DPO. Article 37(1) GDPR specifies three conditions in which the designation

the elements in Article 2(1) are fulfilled, the GDPR applies unless the processing falls under one of the exemptions named in Article 2(2)(a) to (d) GDPR

requirements of data minimization (Article 5(1)(c) GDPR) and storage limitation (Article 5(1)(e) GDPR). Under Article 30(1)(f) GDPR, where possible, the controller

May 2020 (Version 1.1), p. 10 (available here). EDPB, ‘Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679’, 4 May 2020 (Version 1.1), p. 12 (available

is a fundamental right. Article 8(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’) and Article 16(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning

Category:Article 75 GDPR Dix, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 75 GDPR, margin number 1 (C.H. Beck 2020, 3rd edition). Case C-614/10, Commission

Category:Article 31 GDPR Hartung, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 31 GDPR, margin numbers 1-4 (Beck 2020, 3rd edition). For instance, Article 58(1)(f)

number 99. Spiecker et al., GDPR Article-by-Article Commentary (2023), p 1075. Spiecker et al., GDPR Article-by-Article Commentary (2023), p 1074. For example

material or non-material damage. Article 32(1) GDPR reflects the principle of integrity and confidentiality enshrined in Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. The controller and

specific rules. Article 82 GDPR introduces a right to compensation for damage caused as a result of an infringement of the GDPR. Article 82(1) contains the

defined by Article 4(2) GDPR), because Article 81(1) GDPR explicitly refers to 'processing by the same controller or processor'. As a result, the Article does

adoption of a final decision that can be challenged under Article 78(1) GDPR. Again, Article 57(1)(f) GDPR is instructive regarding the SA's obligation "[to

concerning the interpretation of Article 28(1) of Directive 95/46/EC ("DPD"), the Regulation's predecessor. Article 28(1) DPD established the existence of

cases (Article 4(23) GDPR), several supervisory authorities (SA) could be competent according to Article 55 GDPR. For this reason, Article 56(1) GDPR establishes

relationship between the GDPR and the EPD is to be found in Recital 10 and Article 1(2) EPD. Article 1(2) EPD provides that the EPD's provisions serve to "particularise

only bring proceedings under Article 79(1) GDPR in limited circumstances of substantive violations. Instead, Article 79(1) GDPR should be read as excluding

Hence, Article 89(2) and (3) GDPR also allow for specific derogation to the GDPR for these purposes, as further detailed below. Article 89(1) GDPR provides

information in the course of an investigation, in accordance with Article 58(1) GDPR. Article 90 GDPR was drafted with a view to regulate potential conflicts

paragraph of Article 80 GDPR establishes several cumulative conditions for entities to qualify as NPOs. For the purposes of Article 80(1) GDPR must be

design, Article 35(2) explicitly states that the controller must "seek advice" from the DPO when undertaking a DPIA. Additionally, Article 39(1)(c) assigns

two deputy chairs under Article 73(1) GDPR. In the case of the latter provision, the wording of which differs from Article 72(1) GDPR, has lead to the view

of documents within the cooperation and the consistency mechanisms”. Article 10 11(1) of the EDPB RoP require the competent SA to send the relevant documents

definition of the notion of religion in general. For instance, under Article 10(1)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU, “[t]he concept of religion shall in particular

access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), deletion (Article 17 GDPR), restriction of processing (Article 18 GDPR), objection (Article 21 GDPR)

the parties concerned before the civil court (Article 152 of the Code, which makes a reference to Article 10, D.lgs. 150/11). For most data protection claims

Article 99 - Entry into force and application 1. This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official

the relevance of Article 29 GDPR were rooted in the fact that Article 28(3)(b) GDPR already seems to cover much of the scope of Article 29 GDPR. More specifically

on the basis of (i) its legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR) or (ii) the public interest (Article 6(1)(e) GDPR). Hence, data subjects may find themselves

on categories of data listed under Article 9(1) GDPR. There have been conflicting arguments as to whether Article 22(1) GDPR lays down a right or a general

considered as one of the 'other administrative or non-judicial' remedies, which Article 78(2) GDPR refers to. If the DPA decides to uphold their decision, they

legal basis than Article 6(1)(c)(e), for example based on consent or contract (Article 6(1)(b)), the same entity is subject to Article 56. This means that

basis of Article 6(1)(c) GDPR (i.e. processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject) or Article 6(1)(e) GDPR

Article 94 - Repeal of Directive 95/46/EC 1. Directive 95/46/EC is repealed with effect from 25 May 2018. 2. References to the repealed Directive shall

recitals for Article 97 GDPR. Article 97 GDPR imposes a "comprehensive reporting obligation" upon the Commission. The first paragraph of Article 97 GDPR sets

protection principles (Article 5), determination of the legal basis for processing (Article 6), implementation of security measures (Article 32), notification

According to the final paragraph in Article 49(1) GDPR, when none of the derogations described above (Article 49(1)(a-g) GDPR) is applicable, transfers

(GDPR), Article 96 GDPR, p. 1305 (Oxford University Press 2020). Moore, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 96 GDPR

that process them. This was already the case under Article 8(7) of the DPD, the precursor of Article 87 GDPR. In many Member States, the processing of NIN

Article 8: Conditions applicable to child’s consent in relation to information society services 1. Where point (a) of Article 6(1) applies, in relation

one Member State (Article 64(2) GDPR). Docksey notes that the “subject-matter is thus not limited to the matters listed in Article 64(1) and could concern

point, it is important to note that Article 13(1)(f) GDPR, Article 14(1)(f) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR and Article 15(2) GDPR, make specific reference

deliberations of the Board's predecessor, the Article 29 Working Party (“WP29”), were wholly privileged. Under Article 11(1) of WP29's Rules of Procedure, any minutes

However, Article 5(1)(d) GDPR gives the controller some leeway to continue processing inaccurate data - see more details under Article 5(1)(d) GDPR. Article

accordance with Article 58(2) [GDPR]”. These is a reference to the information that SAs must keep in internal records according to Article 57(1)(u) GDPR. The

Article 53 - General conditions for the members of the supervisory authority 1. Member States shall provide for each member of their supervisory authorities

territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3)’, 12 November 2019 (Version 2.1), p. 16 (available here) referring to Article 1(1)(b) Directive (EU) 2015/1535

reasoned objection of a SA (Article 65(1)(a) GDPR), when there are different views on which SA is the lead SA (“LSA”) (Article 65(1)(b) GDPR), and where a SA

restriction of processing carried out in accordance with Article 16, Article 17(1) and Article 18 to each recipient to whom the personal data have been

rules, do not fall within the scope of this article. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 48 GDPR Kuner, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey,

to in Article 42(5) and approved by the supervisory authority which is competent pursuant to Article 55 or 56 or by the Board pursuant to Article 63; (c)

to in Article 46(2)(d) GDPR, contractual clauses referred to in Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, or binding corporate rules within the meaning of Article 47 GDPR

implementing acts are delegated to the Commission pursuant to Article 291 TFEU, Article 93(1) GDPR provides that the Commission shall be assisted by a committee

prejudice to requests by the Commission referred to in point (b) of Article 70(1) and in Article 70(2), the Board shall, in the performance of its tasks or the

The authority addressed under Article 66(1)-(2) GDPR is the CSA within the meaning of Article 4(22) GDPR. In contrast, Article 66(3) refers to “any supervisory

best practices referred to in point (l) of Article 70(1) as well as of the binding decisions referred to in Article 65. Recital 100: Establishment of Certification

it establishes an EU-wide penalty regime for violations under Article 83 GDPR, Article 84(1) GDPR dispenses with complete harmonisation. It does, however

exchange of knowledge between them. This way, Article 50 GDPR expands the exhortation under Article 57(1)(g) GDPR that calls for cooperation between EU

under Article 8(1) GDPR, then the processing is unlawful and therefore the general clause under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR applies. Contrary to Article 17(1)(a)

commentary to Article 60 GDPR, Article 61 GDPR, Article 62 GDPR, Article 63 GDPR, Article 64 GDPR, Article 65 GDPR, Article 66 GDPR and Article 56 GDPR. The

in accordance with Article 98'. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 98 GDPR The CJEU has yet to rule on Article 98 GDPR. Nonetheless

codes of conduct on the basis of Article 41 of Regulation 2016/679 and of a certification body on the basis of Article 43 of Regulation 2016/679; To ensure

Article 38 - Position of the data protection officer 1. The controller and the processor shall ensure that the data protection officer is involved, properly

is not apparent why the principle laid down in Article 72(1) GDPR should be deviated from. Article 72(1) GDPR stipulates that the Board shall take decisions

establishment of SAs, please refer to Article 51(1) GDPR and Article 52 GDPR in this Commentary. Article 54(1)(b) GDPR echoes Article 53(2) GDPR, which outlines the

between Article 21(3) GDPR and Article 17 GDPR on the right to erasure must be considered. The tight relationship between Article 21(3) and Article 17(1)(c)

including the power to adopt binding decisions pursuant to Article 65 GDPR (Article 70(1)(t) GDPR). Article 68 GDPR is the first of nine Articles (Articles 68-76

Datenschutzrecht, Wolff/Brink DS-GVO Article 64 margin numbers 19-20.1 (35th Edition 1.2.2021). Caspar in Kühling, Buchner, GDPR Article 64, margin number 24 (C.H

delegation of power as necessitated by Article 290 TFEU, such as its duration (Article 290(1) TFEU), its revocability (Article 290(2)(a) TFEU), and the dependence

subjects - which would be counterproductive. Article 11 GDPR is meant to address this matter. Under Article 11(1) GDPR, when a processing operation does not

notify the competent supervisory authority of such a breach. Article 34(1) GDPR differs from Article 33 GDPR. Instead of having to notify the supervisor authority

territory of its Member State in accordance with Article 55(1). In that case, the urgent need to act under Article 66(1) shall be presumed to be met and require

controller is subject, under Article 6(1)(c) GDPR. In line with the general objectives of the GDPR, as outlined in Article 1 GDPR Article 16 TFEU, SAs are also

basis of Article 49(1); (k) draw up guidelines for supervisory authorities concerning the application of measures referred to in Article 58(1), (2) and

act under Article 66(1) shall be presumed to be met and require an opinion or an urgent binding decision from the Board pursuant to Article 66(2). Recital

additional benefit of Article 14(1)(d) GDPR may be questionable, if one agrees that Article 14(1)(c) (see commentary on Article 13(1)(c) GDPR) already requires

processing of personal data (see Article 5(1)(a) GDPR), the need to limit the purpose of such processing (see Article 5(1)(b) GDPR), the requirement to have

consent pursuant to point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2) or on a contract pursuant to point (b) of Article 6(1); and (b) the processing is

by other DPAs concerned. The BCR Lead the submits, following Article 64(1) GDPR and Article 64(4) GDPR, a draft decision to the EDPB. The EDPB, in turn

deadline of Article 36(1) GDPR, and it is still disputed whether the outcome of the procedure rather resembles that of Article 58(3)(a) GDPR or Article 58(3)(b)

under the terms referred to in Article 46(2)(f) GDPR. One substantial difference between Article 42(1) GDPR and Article 42(2) GDPR is that in the former

under Article 13 should not be too long. Article 12 GDPR may be limited by Union or national Law in accordance with Article 23 GDPR. Article 12(1) GDPR

This is clear from the wording of Article 41(1) GDPR. Article 41(1) GDPR does not define accreditation. Nonetheless, Article 41(2) GDPR provides a criterion

use of Article 88(1) GDPR. Therefore, for a comprehensive overview of the term ‘more specific’, please refer to section 2.1 below. Article 88(1) GDPR establishes

an agreement on joint responsibility as required under Article 26(1) of the GDPR. Article 33(1) GDPR outlines that controllers (as defined above) have

own motion. Its powers are described under Article 8 of the law "Informatique et Libertés". Under Article R311-1(4) of the French code of administrative justice

Protection Act (ZVOP-1) are still valid and in use, which was confirmed also by some late court decisions. These are of course parts of 2007 ZVOP-1 which are not

Contrary to the general 6 months deadline for any decision under § 73 AVG, § 24(10) DSG exempts the time a foreign lead supervisory authority processed a complaint

do so with the support of the EDPB in accordance with Article 70(1)(b) GDPR. According to Article 45(5) GDPR, the continued monitoring referred to in paragraph

Of the 1,046 complaints that were resolved from 1. 1. 2018 to 24. 5. 2018 the DPC has only made 12 formal decisions, which is equivalent to 1,1% of the

basis: Art. 4 (1), (2), (7) and (8), Art. 5, Art. 44, Art. 46 (1) and (2) (c), Art. 51 (1), Art. 57 (1) (d) and (f), Art. 77 (1), Art. 80 (1) and Art. 93

of Article 5 of the GDPR, Article 24(1) of the GDPR and Article 25(1) paragraph 2 of the GDPR; and 2. a breach of Article 12 paragraph 1 and paragraph 4

defined under Article 2(1)(a) Directive 95/46 where a third party has additional knowledge required to identify a data subject. b) Whether Article 7(1)(f) prevents

Member State? Can Article 4(1)(a) of [Directive 95/46], read in conjunction with recitals 18 to 20 of its preamble and Articles 1(2) and 28(1) thereof, be interpreted

numbers C/10/576071 / HA RK 19-693, C/10/576074 / HA RK 19-694, C/10/576079 / HA RK 19-696, C/10/576096 / HA RK 19-703 and C/10/576129 / HA RK 19-708. 1.6. A

regulation's article 5, subsection 2, cf. Article 5, subsection 1, letters c and f, and Article 5, subsection 1, letter a, cf. Article 6, subsection 1, and Article

‘offences’ and ‘criminal convictions’ within the meaning of Article 8(5) of Directive 95/46 (and Article 10 GDPR). In addition the court judged that a search engine

million) kroner for violation of Article 44 of the data protection regulation. 1 Description of the supervisory matter 1.1 The processing The Swedish Privacy

data than those expressly indicated in Article 22(1), with the exception of personal data referred to in Article 10 GDPR. This means that data concerning

of Personal Data of Volunteers Working with Children (148/2014) 1. Pursuant to Article 10 of Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the processing of

given that Article 6(1), Article 5(1)(a), Article 5(1)(d), Article 5(1)(c), and Article 14 GDPR were infringed in connection to Article 5(1)(b), the AEPD

connection with the violation of article/and 5.1. c); 6.1.; 13.1. (c);13.1(e) and13.2(a)AVG: r PAGE 01-00001582885-0002-0033-01- □1-� r L _JCourt of Appeal Brussels

regulation[1] article 5, subsection 2, cf. Article 5, subsection 1, letters c and f, and Article 5, subsection 1, letter a, cf. Article 6, subsection 1, and

in the same article 83. 111. Article 83 of the GDPR, as referred to in Article 20, paragraph III, of the Data Protection Act, provides: 1. Each supervisory

hundred thousand) for violation of Article 44 of the Data Protection Regulation. 1 Description of the supervisory matter 1.1 The processing The Swedish Privacy

number C/10/576071 / HA RK 19-693, C/10/576079 / HA RK 19-696, C/10/576083 / HA RK 19-697, C/10/576085 / HA RK 19-698, C/10/576091 / HA RK 19-701, C/10/576094

(definition) Article 4.12: Violation of personal data (definition) Article 5.2: Principle of accountability Article 6.1.a: Legal basis of consent Article 6.1.f:

Ordinance Article 5, paragraph Article 5 (2) 1, letter c and letter f., Article 5, paragraph Article 6 (1) (a) Article 32 (1), (1), (33) 1 and 35, para. 1. Below

that the Medical List does today, cf. GDPR Article 4, No. 11, Article 6 No. 1 letter a, Article 7 and Article 9 No. 2 letter a If current practice is invalid

data" under Article 9(1) GDPR? The decision of the DSB is not published. So far there are only news reports on the case (see e.g. ORF.at) On 29. 10. 2019 the

clarification on the interpretation of Article 15 GDPR. The Supreme Court asked the following preliminary question: 'Is Article 15(1)(c) of the GDPR to be interpreted

arguing that it wasn’t a controller within the definition set out under Article 2(d) Directive 95/46 and that NRW did not have legal standing to bring a

may not be based on Article 45. Article 46.1 provides, among other things, that in the absence of a decision in accordance with Article 45.3 a personal data

be established on Article 45. Article 46.1 provides, among other things, that in the absence of a decision in accordance with Article 45.3 a personal data

explanatory statement of the law, Article 10 defines the Authority’s competence in compliance with Article 55 GDPR.Article 55 GDPR provides for a restriction

provides useful clarifications in this regard. 34 Article 5(1)(b), Article 6 ( 1) point a) k and Article 6, paragraph (4), it is clear from the combined

categories of information in Article 8 (1) and (5) of Directive 95/46 or in Article 9 (1), Article 10 (1) and Article 10 of Regulation 2016/679, the infringement

assessing the scope of Article 96 of the Latvian Constitution, an account must be taken of the GDPR as well as of Article 16 TFEU and Article 8 of the Charter

according to To 1): € 1.200,00 To 2): € 300,00 To 3): € 300,00 . . . In total: € 1.800 To 1): 3 days To 2): 1 day To 3): 1 day ... In total: 5 days Ad 1): Art.

provide for the possibility of bringing such actions of Article 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure1. 1 See, by way of example, the Authority's Decision No 73/2018

the merits of any complaint: The judges noted the flexible languange of Article 57(1)(f) UK GDPR. The Commissioner must "handle" a complaint. He must "investigate

e7141c720c53441c2483c; has_js=1; _gid=GA1.2.1837808855.1597415922; _gat=1 Upgrade-Insecure-Requests 1 If-None-Match" 1597405902-1" Cache-Control max-age=0”

categories of personal data under Article 9(1) GDPR. Their processing would require the data subjects' explicit consent under Article 9(2)(a) GDPR and § 151(4)

II In accordance with article 5.1 of the RGPD, the processing of personal data must be governed by the following principles: "1. The personal data will

The civil procedure is mainly regulated in the Law 1/2000, of 7 January, on Civil Proceedings (Ley 1/2000, de 7 de enero, de Enjuiciamiento Civil). Spanish

with the provided for in article 58.2.b) of the RGPD, for the alleged infringement of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD.

arguments for the following reasons: 1) Article 78(2) GDPR defines the applicable time frame in line with Article 4:13(1) of the Dutch Administrative law.

data. In particular, it follows from the provisions of Article 57 (1) (f) of the GDPR and Article 13 (1) (g) of Law 4624/2019 that the Authority has the competence

accordance with Article 16 of the Privacy Ordinance are met. The principle of accuracy in the Privacy Ordinance, Article 5, paragraph 1, letter d, does

(see, for example, Article 10 of the Introductory Act to the Civil Code in respect of the right to a name and Article 19.1 sentence 1 of the Introductory

served on the defendant until January 15, 2021 (Section 204 (1) No. 1 BGB, Section 253 (1) ZPO). Insofar as the district court has determined that the

third-party action (1.). On the complainant's side, his general right of personality (Article 2.1 in conjunction with Article 1.1 of the Basic Law) in

Para. 1 and Para. 2, Art. Article 25(1), Article 30(5), Article 32(1) and (2), Article 34(1), Article 35(1) and Article 35(3). or Art. 37 Para. 1 lit. b

compliance and accountability with the principles of Article 5(1) and par.2 in conjunction with Article 6(1) GDPR. B. imposes on NEW YORK COLLEGE S.A. the effective

direct offer of services of the Information Society. Without prejudice to Article 8(1) GDPR, for child under the age of fourteen, consent is only valid if provided

and application of Article 20.1 c) by the AEPD implies the exclusion of the weighting required by the legitimizing basis of Article 6.1.f) of the RGPD and

under Article 15(4)(c) and 15(8) of Law No. 4624/19, the national data protection law, in conjunction with Article 58(2) GDPR. According to Article 6 of

Subparagraph (1)(b) therefore has to be written as #1b! Example: [[Article 6 GDPR#1b|Article 6(1)(b)]] becomes Article 6(1)(b) and links to Article 6, section

right to privacy. Health data are sensitive data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of the Italian Data Protection Code, health data can

authorities in Article 57.1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter RGPD). Thus, on 10/10/18, 25/10/18 and 15/01/19

functions assigned to the control authorities in the article 57.1 and the powers granted in article 58.1 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection

enshrined in Article 5(1)(d). Finally, the DPA also considered that the lack of any mechanism to check the age of the users entailed a violation of Article 8 GDPR

classified as very serious in article 72.1. e) from the LOPDGDD, with 10,000 euros. -article 13 of the GDPR, in accordance with article 83.5 b) of the GDPR, and

provision. Pursuant to Article 78 of the Regulation, as well as to Article 152 of the Code and Article 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1 September 2011, an

However, the other two conditions of Article 6 (1) (f) of the GDPR are not met. (26) The second condition of Article 6 (1) (f) of the GDPR is that the processing

practice. Recital 1: The protection of natural persons in relation to the processing of personal data is a fundamental right. Article 8(1) of the Charter

violation of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR SAW The violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD implies the commission of the violations typified in article 83.5 of

pursuant to § 57(1)(4) VgV. The Procurement Chamber noted that a procurement is illegal if the company deviates from its initial offer (§ 57(1)(4) VgV). This

subjects required by Article 12.2. of the GDPR. 8.1.3. As for the breach of the principle of minimization (article 5.1 c) of the GDPR) 8.1.3.1. In view of the

accordance with the provisions of articles 55 para. 1, 2 para. 1 and 3 para. 2 GDPR and 13 para. 1 item g' Law 4624/2019, the Authority has the authority

the processing of personal data of Article 23(1) of Regulation 2018/1725, the EDPS recalled that, under Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation 2018/1725, processing

violation of articles 38.1, 38.3, 39.1 a) and 39.1 b) of the GDPR; - to issue an injunction against Company A to comply with Article 38.1 of the GDPR, within

regarded as an access request under Article 15(1) GDPR. According to Recital 63 GDPR, the right of access under Article 15 GDPR serves data subjects to be

encouraged by that community pursuant to Article 2(d) of Data Protection Directive 95/46, read in the light of Article 10(1) of the Charter. Share your comments

violating Article 5(1)(c) and Article 5(1)(e) GDPR. The DPA of Berlin fined Deutsche Wohnen SE for violating Article 5(1)(c) and Article 5(1)(e) GDPR,

violates Article 32 GDPR. Retaining personal data of an applicant for a lease after another applicant has been selected also violates Article 5(1)(e) GDPR

accordance with the provisions of Article 6(1)(c), Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, or both provisions? 2.     Does the answer to Question 1 mean: a)      that the person

d'un montant de 10.000 € (article 83, paragraphe 2, de l'AVG ; article 100, §1, 13° WOG et article 101 WOG). 129. Compte tenu de l'article 83 AVG et de la

with the powers that article 58.2 of the GDPR grants to each authority of control and as established in articles 47, 48.1, 64.2 and 68.1 of the LOPDGDD, The

constitute personal data under Article 4(1) GDPR? If so, do they qualify as special categories of personal data under Article 9 GDPR? Is the defendant obliged

referred to in Article 5(1) LRN, under which the controller did not fall in. Therefore, the controller breached Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 6(1) GDPR, in

application 1.b., from §§ 1, 3 para. 1 no. 1, 4 UKlag in conjunction with §§ 307 para. 1, para. 2 no.1 in conjunction with Art. 5 para. 1 lit. a), Art

▪ Articles 5.1.a and 5.2 (principles of fairness, transparency and accountability) ▪ Article 6.1 (lawfulness of processing); ▪ Article 9.1 and 9.2 (processing

enumerated under Article 3(1) Directive 95/46. The court looked at the term personal data under Article 3(1) Directive 95/46 and Article 2(a) Directive 95/46

Data Protection in § 1 DSG, the Rights to Privacy and Data Protection in Article 7 and 8 CFR and the Right to Privacy in Article 8 ECHR. Applications can

(f), Article 5(2), Article 6(1), Article 7(1), Article 24(1), Article 25(1), Article 32(1)(b), Article 32(1)(c) and Article 32(1)(b), Article 32(1)(c) and

provided for in Article 5(1)(a), (e) and (f), Article 5(2), Article 24(1) and (2), Article 28(3), Article 30(1)(d) and (f) and Article 32(1) of the General

comply with section 5.1(b) of the MDR, and for failure to comply with section 5.1(a) of the MDR. and 5.1(b), 6.1, 25.1 and 25.2, 32.1 and 32.4 of the MDR

Authority (APO below}, what it does on June 17, 2020 » 1• 1 Impugned Decision, Exhibit 36, §§ 1 - 24. 1 PAGE 01-00003026497-0006-0025-02-01-� L_JCourt of Appeal

requirements of Article 13 of the Regulation. C. On the breach relating to cookies 69. Article 82 of the Data Protection Act (Article 32.II in a wording

minor, following Article 5(5) UAVG. In all other situations, the age of consent is 16 years, following Article 5(1) UAVG. Pursuant to Article 43 of the Dutch

Supervision: Article 6(1)(f), legitimate interest. For the special category personal data: About diagnosis: Article 6(1)(a), cf. Article 9(2)(a), consent

decision under Article 3 of the French Data Protection Act, the DPA assessed if TikTok fulfilled two requirements. Under the first one, (1) the provider

context Article 29 of the Data Protection Act 2019 establishes exceptions in Article 9(1) GDPR, Article 15 GDPR, Article 16 GDPR, Article 18(1)(a) GDPR

Administrative Court. 3. Legal Assessment 3.1. To dismiss the complaint 3.1.1. In accordance with Art. 15 Para. 1 GDPR, the data subject has the right to request

on April 1, 2017 in the amount of €39.96, 14 Tariff B... increase on April 1, 2020 in the amount of €74.26, 15Tarif T... increase on April 1, 2017 in the

the application in accordance with the wording of the provision of Article 15 (1) GDPR. 1. An application for action is sufficiently specific if it describes

Data Protection Regulation - GDPR), in conjunction with Article 3, Article 4(2) and Article 6(1)(b), all of which are applicable to the processing of personal

processing by the defendant can only be Article 6 (1) sentence 1 lit e) DSGVO (see b) or Article 6 (1) sentence 1 lit f) DSGVO (see c), the requirements

specified in the same Article 83." 112. Under Article 83 of the GDPR, as referred to in Article 20(III) of the Data Protection Act: "1. Each supervisory authority

within the scope of Article 10 because of the broad interpretation of "personal data of a criminal nature" as is referred to in Article 1 of the Act Implementing

conformity with Article 5.1. c), Article 6.1., Article 13.1. c), Article 13.1. c), Article 13.1. e) and Article 13.2. a) of the DGPS pursuant to Article 101 of

under Article L 521-2 of the Code of Administrative Justice or where it exists serious doubts as the legality of the decision, under Article L 521-1 of the

provided for in Article 56(1), read in conjunction with Article 56(2), read in conjunction with Article 56(3), read in conjunction with Article 56(4), read

pertaining to human dignity (Article 2(1) Greek Constitution) and to the right to freely form one's personality (Article 5(1) Greek Constitution). The HDPA

had violated Article 5(1)(e) GDPR and Article 25(2) GDPR. As a result, the DPA issued a reprimand to the controller in accordance with Article 58(2)(b) GDPR

data, in particular of children was in breach of Article 5, Article 6, Article 8, Article 9, and Article 25 GDPR. Consequently, the DPA urgently imposed

against the respondent, for the alleged infringement of Article 5.1.d) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD. SIXTH: On October 28, 19, written

sanctioned for infraction of the article 5.1.f) and 5.2 of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD and in article 72.1.a) of the LOPDGDD, with an administrative

GDPR, Article 9 GDPR, Article 10 GDPR, Article 30 GDPR and Article 34 GDPR, as well as the provision of the PDPA governing processing of personal data

privacy policies, which is contrary to Article 12 paragraph 1 of the GDPR and, in this regard, to Article 13 paragraphs 1 and 2; 5. For the recording of telephone

2097 35 lg 1 p 1235(1)12 of the AvTS § 35 lg 1 p 3, AvTS § Notice of termination of Termination of proceedings personal data protection case 1. The factual

175 investigated are not compliant with the consent requirements under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR when placing cookies. Following its investigation of 175 websites

SABAM’s injunction would (1) effectively impose on Netlog a general obligation to monitor, which was prohibited by Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31 and

accordance with article 11 par.1 Law 3471/2006, as applicable, the prior consent of the data subject, without prejudice to paragraph 3 of the same article, as applicable

for infringement of Article 6(1) GDPR. Furthermore, he argued the infringement of Article 26 GDPR (joint responsibility) and Article 44 GDPR (third country

accordance with article 11 par.1 Law 3471/2006, as applicable, the prior consent of the data subject, without prejudice to paragraph 3 of the same article, as applicable

Protection Agency, OIB: 28454963989 on the basis of Article 57 paragraph 1 and of Article 58, Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

preliminary ruling: ‘(1) Must Articles 77(1) and 79(1) GDPR be interpreted as meaning that the administrative appeal provided for in Article 77 GDPR constitutes

within the meaning of the first paragraph of Article 2 of Directive 2002/58, read in conjunction with Article 2(b) of Directive 95/46. The information therefore

Article 57 (1) (a), Article 58 (2) (e) and (i), Article 83 (1) - (3) and Article 83 (4) (a) in connection with Article 33 (1) and Article 34 (1), (2) and

subject's right of access is guaranteed by Article 15(1) GDPR. The court used Article 15(4) to read Article 15(3) as conferring a 'right' to the data free

council in Greece to cease their processing activities, under Article 58(2) GDPR and Article 15(8) of Law 4624/2019, because of an unresolved data breach

following the insufficient compliance with his access request pursuant to Article 15(1) GDPR. The data subject worked as a cook for over 20 years for the controller

been taken up in Article 5(1)(b) of the GDPR under the Principles relating to the processing of personal data (Chapter II). Article 5(1)(b) of the RGPD

against Google. The DPA noted that the lawful basis was Article 6(1)(f) GDPR and referred to the Article 29 Group's guidelines WP225 relating to search engine

|GDPR_Article_1= |GDPR_Article_Link_1= |GDPR_Article_2= |GDPR_Article_Link_2= |GDPR_Article_3= |GDPR_Article_Link_3= |GDPR_Article_4= |GDPR_Article_Link_4=

|GDPR_Article_1= |GDPR_Article_Link_1= |GDPR_Article_2= |GDPR_Article_Link_2= |GDPR_Article_3= |GDPR_Article_Link_3= |GDPR_Article_4= |GDPR_Article_Link_4=

lawful processing of personal data (Article 5(1) of the GDPR), must, in accordance with Article 12(1) of the GDPR. 1 of the GDPR, must take appropriate

thousand euros), under¬ Article 6.1 (a) and Article 5.1 (a) of the GDPR, under consideration as ‘very serious’, in¬ Article 71 (1) (a) and (b), respectively

Directives 2001/29 and 2004/48, and that they therefore have to comply with "Article 15(1) Directive 2000/31, which prohibits national authorities from adopting

6, Subsection 1, Clauses 1, 2 and 7 of the Data Protection Act, Article 9, Clause 1 of the Data Protection Regulation does not apply: 1) information obtained

the social and health authority of a city to have breached Article 6(1) GDPR and Article 10 GDPR by requesting data subjects to provide it with personal

.......... ..... 10 Postal address: Box 8114 104 20 Stockholm Website: www.imy.se E-mail: imy@imy.se Phone: 08-657 61 00 Page 1 of 10, Integrity Protection

DPA referred to Article 5(1)(a) (principle of lawfulness, fairness and transparency), Article 12(1), Article 7, Article 13 and Article 14 GDPR, the corresponding

management, - Article 12 (1) of the GDPR, as it did not provide transparent and understandable information, - Article 15 (1) and Article 17 (1) of the GDPR

in Article 6 GDPR. If the information also includes sensitive data specified in Article 9(1) GDPR, there must be a basis for processing in Article 9(2)

infringement of article 6.1 of the RGPD, sanctioned in accordance with the provisions of article 83.5.a) of the aforementioned RGPD and article 32.1 of the RGPD

authorities for the purposes set out in Article 1(1) shall not be processed for purposes other than those set out in Article 1(1) unless such processing is authorised

functions assigned to the control authorities in the article 57.1 and the powers granted in article 58.1 of the Regulation (EU) C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es

reproduction of the personal data to be provided pursuant to Article 15(1) of the GDPR, Article 15(3) sentence 1 of the GDPR must be interpreted as meaning that, due

limited by some principles inscribed in paragraphs 1 and 3 of article 3 and paragraph 1 of article 4 of the SIRP Framework Law: (i) the principle constitutionality

regulation [1] for the data subject's consent in Article 4(11), and the basic principle of legality, reasonableness and transparency in Article 5(1)(a). Furthermore

the debt collection activities were completed. On the other hand, Section 10 (1) of the Accounting Act requires that certain data relating to accounting

objections to their processing, according to with article 21 par. 1 of the GDPR, which is based on article 6 par. 1 item or GDPR. In his reply dated 24-05-2022

safeguards' as stated in Article 10 GDPR. Brein appealed this ruling. The Court of appeal held that it had to answer two questions: (1) if there was a legal

personal data within the meaning of Article 4, opening words and (1) of the AVG. Based on Article 2, paragraph 1 and Article 3, paragraph 2, of the AVG, the

ensure that paragraph 1 is complied with.
 
 SECTION IV
 INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN TO THE DATA SUBJECT
 Article 10 
 Information in cases

documentation is attached: 1. Communication received by the claimed at the email address <*** EMAIL.1> sent from <*** EMAIL.2> on May 10, 2020. 2. Plain header

accountability (Article 5 (2) and 24 (1), (2) GDPR), privacy by design (Article 25 (1) GDPR) and as controller towards its data processors (Article 28 GDPR).

processing pursuant to Article 21, Paragraph 1 and there is no justified reason for the processing. According to Article 21, paragraph 1 of the Data Protection

referred to in Article 33(1) of the AVG.15 15 File note 1, Notification of personal data breach 7-2-2019. P 5. 3.4.3 Assessment Article 33(1) of the AVG provides

categories of information in Article 8 (1) and (5) of Directive 95/46 or in Article 9 (1), Article 10 (1) and Article 10 of Regulation 2016/679, the infringement

35 (1) 9) of the PSA, but in refusing to comply with a request for information, § 35 (1) 5 ) and Point 10 of because § 35 section 1 subsection 5 1 added

show_context_help(h) { newWindow = window.open(h,"Help", "menubar=1,toolbar=1,scrollbars=1,resizable=1,width=700, height=500"); } </SCRIPT><NOSCRIPT></NOSCRIPT><STYLE

self-determination of the respective purchaser from Article 2, Paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 1, Paragraph 1 of the Basic Law, which conflicts with interest

code, in particular its articles L. 251-1 to L. 255-1, L. 242-1 to L. 242-8, L. 722-1; Considering article 10 of Law No. 2023-380 of May 19, 2023 relating

the infringement of Article 5.1 c) AVG has been proven. f)Transparent information (Article 5.1(a); Article 12.1. and Article 13.1. and 13.2. AVG) 43.The

processing conditions of Article 6 (1) of the GDPR. This follows both from Article 21(1)(1)(2) of the GDPR, which refers to Article 6(1)(1)(e) and (f) of the

Regulation as an independent processor (Article 28 par. 10 GDPR). Furthermore, in accordance with the provisions of Article 29 of the GDPR, the processor should

for violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD. IV Classification of the violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD The violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD

interest). […] 10. Data transfers 10.1 Data storage and processing facilities. The Client accepts that Google, without prejudice to Section 10.2 (Data Transfers)

claimed 3 legal bases for the processing: Article 6(1)(c) legal obligation, Article 6(1)(b) contract, and Article 6(1)(f) legitimate interests. The Court rejected

finepublic, as indicated in article 77.1. c) and 2. 4. 5. and 6. of the LOPDDGG: “ 1. Theregime established in this article will be applicable to the treatments

October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged infringement of article 5.1.f) of

was an infringement of article 5, paragraph 1, a), b) and c) and paragraph 2, article 6, paragraph 1, f) and article 24 paragraph 1 of the GDPR. 15JudgmentAsociación

infringement of Article 32 GDPR in conjunction with Article 5(1)(f) GDPR? The Romanian DPA (ANSPDCP) found that the controller violated Article 32 GDPR as they

Regulation no. 1/2000; REPORTER Dr. Antonello Soro; PROVIDED THAT 1. The complaint against the company and the investigative activity. 1.1. With a complaint

Agency's decision 3.1. Authorization to record telephone conversations 3.1.1. Pursuant to Article 9 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation 1, there is in principle

§ 56 subsection 1, subsection 2 point 8, § 58 subsection 1, § 10 of the Personal Data Protection Act (IKS) and Article 58 paragraph 1 point d and paragraph

with the provisions of article 58.2.i) of the GDPR, for the alleged infringement of article 6.1 of the GDPR, typified in article 83.5.b) of the GDPR. SECOND:

restaurant owner lawful in line of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR? The Spanish DPA concluded that there has been a breach of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR because the uploading

authorities an infringement of Article 5 (1) (d) GDPR? The AEPD agreed to impose a penalty for infringement of Article 5 (1) (d) for lack of accuracy in

ofcombined provisions of Articles 5, paragraph 1 to 1. c) and article 5, paragraph 1 al. f) with article83, paragraph 5, al. a), the General Data Protection

the infraction has not been accredited, in accordance with article 90.1 of Law 39/2015, of 1/10, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations

typified in article 83.5.e) of the RGPD, which considers as such: “no facilitate access in breach of article 58, paragraph 1 ”. The same article establishes

Supervision Authority of 05.11.2019 No 2.1-3/19/3612 and reopen the complaint lodged by the applicant of the complaint of 10.10.2019 and refer the matter to another

A 9/10 - With regard to the violation of article 38.6 of the GDPR, the restricted committee notes that a new DPO has been appointed, as of April 1, 2021

privacy policy, contravene Articles 13(1), 6(1)(a) and 8 GDPR? The AEPD found that GRUP BC S.L violated Article 13(1), 6(1)(a) and 8 GDPR. Share your comments

on the merits in accordance with Article 98 et seq. WOG, to: - on the basis of Article 58.2.c) GDPR and Article 95, §1, 5° WOG to the controller order that

prohibited by article 21.1 of the LSSI? In this case, there was no dispute. BUBO MEDIA acknowledged that their actions were not in line with article 21.1 LSSI,

Moreover, the information provided as per Article 13 GDPR were not compliant with the requirements of Article 12 GDPR in light of the fact that TikTok services

Law §1 para 1 Data Protection Law §1 para 2 Data Protection Law §9 para 1 Media Law §1 no 6 Media Law §1 no 7 Media Law §1 Z8 lit c Law of Parties §1 para

processing of personal data, cf. the Privacy Ordinance Article 4 No. 2 and the Personal Data Act § 1. Article 6 (1) of the Privacy Regulation requires that the data

included in the crime of fraud of the Article 248.1 of the current CP. Crime with the aggravation of article 250.1.6º of the CP. What has been seen so far

for the claimed party, for the alleged infringement of article 32.1 of the RGPD, typified in article 83.4.a) of the aforementioned Regulation, and considered

03/31/2020, a written letter is sent to the respondent, *** ADDRESS.1, *** LOCALITY.1 (*** PROVINCE.1), address of the Mer- cantil, giving result "Returned to Origin

registered on the Robinson List in breach of Article 48(1)(b) LGT and Article 21 GDPR in conjunction with Article 23(4) LOPDGDD. Avilon Center SL made an voluntary

turn, article 72. 1 h) of the LOPDGDD, under the heading "Infringements considered very serious provides: “1 Based on the provisions of article 83.5 of

to Article 15 of the Garante Regulation No 1/2000; Rapporteur: Dr Antonello Soro; PROVIDED THAT The Council of State requested, pursuant to Article 4 of

In an Article 60 GDPR procedure, the Danish DPA reprimanded Danske bank for a violation of Article 32(1) GDPR. A technical error resulted in the unauthorised

FIRST: IMPOSE A.A.A., with NIF *** NIF.1,  For an infringement of article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the mentioned rule, a fine of

www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 10 10/10 In accordance with the provisions of article 50 of the LOPDPGDD, this Resolution will be made

***NIF.1, for a violation of Article 6.1 and another of article 13 of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 letters a) and b) of the RGPD, a fine of €1,500 (€1

relation to the Article 5 of the LOPDGDD, typified in article 83.5 a) of the RGPD. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 2/10 FOURTH: Once

art. 47 and 48.1 of LOPDGDD. II Article 6.1 of the RGPD establishes the assumptions that allow the legal processing of personal data. Article 14 of the RGPD

processing in dispute, in the limits set in Article 13. With regards to substance, the Court stated, first, that Article 10 sets out what information must be provided

and urban streets ”- following census permanent- (Article 1, paragraph 227, letter a)); Given the art. 1, paragraph 228, of the budget law under which “permanent

Spanish DPA recalled the conditions for valid consent under Article 4(11) GDPR and Article 6(1) LOPDGDD (National data protection law aimed at the implementation

this resolution, in accordance with the provisions of article 98.1.b) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Ad- Public

§ 166 para. 1 p. 1 ZPO § 114 para. 1 p. 1, § 121 para. 1 StVZO § 31a paragraph 1 p. 1, paragraph 3 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 Art. 5 para. 1 lit. d, Art

***NIF.1, for an infringement of Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD, in relation to Article 72(1)(a) a fine of EUR 10 000 (TEN

of article Article 24.1, and in relation to the obligations referred to in the previous section, The information obligation provided for in Article 5 of

infringement of article 5.1(b), as defined in Article 83(5)(a) and considered for the purposes of the statute of limitations in Article 72(1)(a), a fine of

The fact that the processing of the controller relied on Article (6)(1)(b) GDPR and Article 6(1)(c) GDPR as legal basis affects the holding of the DPA since

procedure for the one claimed by the allegedinfringement of article 6.1.a), typified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD.FIFTH: Notified the initiation agreement

ascertained, that pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code and Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Regulation of the Guarantor no. 1/2019, this measure should

granted to supervisory authorities in Article 57.1 of Regulation (EU)2016/679 (RGPD). Thus, with dates of 10/16/18, and 10/31/18, an information request is

for in article 15.1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 that are not be included in the remote access system. 3. For the purposes established in article 12.5 of

in paragraph 1 of the same article, which include legality, objectivity and transparency of processing in accordance with article 5 par. 1 item a' - i.e

section 1, subsection 1, section 14, subsections 1–2, section 15, subsections 1 and 3. and subsection 4, 3 points, section 16, subsection 1, section 18

       The requests of 10 July 2018 and 3 September 2018 referred to in this judgment were based on the Wob and Article 15 of the GDPR. 2.1. In the part of the

C/EX/6429-1/07-10-2020 for providing its views, in which the Authority replied to the letter No. C/EX/6429-1/07-10-2020. C/EIS/6905/09-10-2020, it stated

compliance with paragraph 1 ("accountability") ". 8.1. Based on the Data Minimization Principle established by Article 5 (1) (c) of the GIP, Defendant

Aalmoes and 1 1 2 others v the Netherlands admissibility of 25- 1 1 -2004. , See Press Release C / EX / 1728 / 0 1 .3.20 1 8 regarding the granting ofno

the article 43.1 of said Law. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 12 12/12 II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of

highest amount of € 10,000,000 […] in Annex 1 Classified in Category I, Category II or Category III. In Annex 1 is the violation of Article 33, first member

art. 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation n. 1/20129, and believes that the conditions pursuant to art. 17 of Regulation no. 1/2019. Pursuant to

details. Injunction order against UniCredit SpA - June 10, 2020 Register of measures n. 99 of 10 June 2020 GUARANTOR FOR THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA

period ”. In this sense, article 77.1 c) and 2, 4 and 5 of the LOPGDD, indicates: 1. "The regime established in this article shall apply to the treatment

in its database. The request for erasure under Article 17(1) GDPR is not applicable, because under Article 17(3)(e) GDPR, the processing was necessary for

personal data in violation of Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 15(1) GDPR. Firstly, the DPA found a violation of Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, as the controller

Section 1 (1) DSG can therefore not be assumed (RS0130870). 3.2.1. On the legality of the publication of the BF's data in the app Art 6 para 1 GDPR contains

referred to as ABN AMRO. 1.2 1.2 [Appellants] lodged an appeal with the Court of Appeal on 1 May 2019, received at the Court Registry on 1 May 2019, against the

written procedure, Article 17 (10) of Law 2190/1994, as replaced by Article 13 (1) of Law 3801/2009 and paragraph 11 of that article, provides that the

by the alleged violation of Article 32 of the RGPD, Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, Article 25 of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD. FOURTH: On

Complaint no. Γ/ΕΙΣ/7103/16-10-2020, Γ/ΕΙΣ/7255/22-10-2020, Γ/ΕΙΣ/7299/23-10- 2020, G/EIS/7300/23-10-2020 and G/EIS/7301/23-10-2020 notifications of breaches

for violating Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR, Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR, Article 14 GDPR, Article 24(1) GDPR, and Article

commerce (hereinafter LSSI), as provided in article 43.1 of said Law. II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public

basis of the processing, taking into account article 11 par. 1 and 2 of Law 3471/2006, may be article 6 par. 1 f of the GDPR ("the processing is necessary

the Guarantor pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code "(Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation no. 1/2019). The aforementioned

decided the following: Article 66 GDPR gives the possibility for a procedure of urgency and from this article (and Article 66 and Article 62 GDPR), the European

right to data portability ; (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a), the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any

Juan, 6www.aepd.es28001 - Madridsedeagpd.gob.es Page 10 10/10In accordance with the provisions of article 50 of the LOPDPGDD, this Re-solution will be made

Sentence 1, Section 102 Paragraph 1 BetrVG, Section 17 Paragraph 2 Sentence 1 KSchG) on the consultation (e.g. Section 90 Paragraph 2 Sentence 1, Section

the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or on Article 9, (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a), the existence of the

under Article 14 GDPR result in the general unlawfulness of the processing and the obligation for the controller to delete the data under Article 17(1)(d)

provision(s): Regarding 1) - Article 5(1)(a) and (c) and Article 6(1) of the Data Protection Basic Regulation - DSGVO, OJ No L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1. Re 2) (a) Section

privacy. Health data are special categories of data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of the Italian Data Protection Code, health data can

right to privacy. Health data are sensitive data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of the Italian Data Protection Code, health data can

right to privacy. Health data are sensitive data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of the Italian Data Protection Code, health data can

under Article 28 of the GDPR and the responsibilities arising from failure to comply with them. In fact, on the one hand, Article 28, paragraph 1, of the

imposed by sections 24.1., 28.1. and 30.1. of the DGPS ; -On 11 June 2019, the Disputes Chamber decides, pursuant to Article 95, § 1, 1° and 98 of the ICA

"Principles of Data Protection", article 4.1 of the LOPDGDD determines: "4. Data accuracy. 1. In accordance with article 5.1.d) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

same article 83. 40. Article 83 of the GDPR provides: 1. Each supervisory authority shall ensure that administrative fines imposed under this Article for

found violations of Articles 5(1)(c) and 6 GDPR and Article 29(1) of Law 125(I)/2018. Concerning the violation of Article 29(1) of Law 125(I)/2018, the DPA

with the provisions of article 64 of the LOPDGDD.Finally, it is pointed out that in accordance with the provisions of article 112.1 of theLPACAP, there is

the controller was in breach of Article 38(1) GDPR at the time of the investigation. Regarding the breach of Article 39(1)(b) GDPR, the CNPD concurred with

commerce (hereinafter LSSI), as provided in article 43.1 of said Law. II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public

07.2020, 11 LA 104/19, ECLI:DE:OVGNI:2020:0722.11LA104.19.00 Article 1 (1) GG, Article 2 (1) GG, § 7aF DSG ND, § 43 VwGO Proceedings VG Osnabrück, 30 January

theIESAstates that“InrelationtoprocessingforwhichArticle6(1)(b)GDPRisreliedon,Articles 5(1)(a), 12(1)and13(1)(c) GDPR have beeninfringed”. TheIE SAconsidered

complaint under Article 77 GDPR was very clear and limited in scope. However, the DSB went on to assert a violation of Article 12 GDPR and Article 15(1)(h) GDPR

Behavioural Advertising based on Article 6(1)(b) or 6(1)(f) GDPR in the context of the Services. In line with Article 66(1), the order applies with respect

that the article’s publication was in violation of Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, when read in line with Article 85 GDPR. Article 5(1)(c) outlines

available article at https: //verein-n***.at/presse/news/201*/berichteneu*3*1*8*.php from May 11, 2017 reads as follows (formatting not 1: 1 reproduced

for in Article 6 (1) GPA, as well as to be able to demonstrate in the context of internal compliance compliance with the principles of Article 5 1 1 GPA,

Constitution. It therefore went on to say that, Article 57 of the Law, read in combination with Article 60 of the same Law, provide that procedures must

Ticketmaster had failed to comply with its obligations under Article 5(1)(f) and Article 32 of GDPR. Article 5 (1) : Ticketmaster has failed to comply with the requirements

obligation for the DPA to process the case pursuant to Article 77. It follows from Article 57(1)(a) GDPR that the Data Protection Authority shall, "supervise

Manifestation of the general right of personality, Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG in conjunction with Article 1 Paragraph 1 GG, or from Section 823 Paragraph 2 BGB in

the Strijp-S housing complex in Eindhoven. It's agreed 1 Facts 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 that [plaintiff] directly to PME Investment Services

imposed by sections 24.1., 28.1. and 30.1. of the DGPS ; -On 11 June 2019, the Disputes Chamber decides, pursuant to Article 95, § 1, 1° and 98 of the ICA

2504). According with article 2 par. 1-2 of the said 6632/2021 C.Y.A.: "For the hotels of sub-para. aa' of para. a' of par. 2 of article 1 of Law 4276/2014

the Guarantor n. 1/2000; Rapporteur dr. Antonello Soro; WHEREAS 1. The complaint against the company and the preliminary activity. 1.1. With a complaint

would be based 5. 1, a) GDPR, Article 6, Article 12.1 GDPR and Article 14.1 a) GDPR. 67. Moreover, a controller, in this case defendant 1, cannot suffice

the provisions of Act no. 33/2013 on consumer loans, ie. Article 5 (now k) Article 5 and Article 10. which stipulate that the consumer's credit rating is

union membership is in principle prohibited. Article 24.1 of the GDMP also states that that : 10 "ARTICLE 29" Working Party on Data Protection, "Opinion

Regulation) Article 1, paragraph 2, Article 5, Article 6, paragraph 1, subparagraph f, Article 17(1)(a), (c) and (d), Article 17(3)(a), Article 21(1) Judgments

par. 1, lit. a) and 13 of the Regulation. The data controller must process the data "lawfully, correctly and transparently" (Article 5, paragraph 1, letter

EUROPA LINEAS AÉREAS SA, with CIF *** CIF.1 , for an infringement of article 32.1 of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.4.a) of the RGPD, a fine of € 500,000

requests it. ". 26. Article D. 213-1 of the same code provides that "[t]he amount mentioned in article L. 213-1 is set at 120 euros" and article D. 213-2 provides

processing carried out is in violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32 GDPR and Article 35 GDPR. Especially, the controller cannot

otherwise makes it impossible to exercise the information function" (Article 2, paragraph 1, of the Deontological Rules) and that the existence of this requirement

parties are hereinafter referred to as the applicant and Microsoft. 1 The procedure 1.1. The course of the procedure is apparent from: - the application with

the scope of the obligations and rights provided for in Articles 6 (1), 10, 11 (1), 12 and 21 when such a restriction constitutes a necessary measures

purpose limitation under Article 5(1)(a) of the GDPR. 1(b) and the obligation (principle) of accountability under Article 5(1)(b). 2 of the GDPR, that

Ordinance Article 6 and Article 5 No. 1 letter a. The background and reasons for the decision follow below. 2. Details of the facts of the case On 10 April

euros, for the above violations of article 17 in combination with article 21 par. 3 of the GCP and article 25 par. 1 of the GCPD. The Deputy Chairman The

violation of the general right of personality under Article 1.1, Article 2.1 of the Basic Law (Article 7, Article 8 of the Basic Law) was to be taken into account

obligation (Article 4:32 § 1 Wft). Therefore, Article 6(1)(c) GDPR was relevant. However, the Court highlighted that the phrase "at least on" in Article 6(1) GDPR

claimed, by thealleged violation of Article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of theRGPD.FIFTH: On 07/10/20 this Agency receives a written allegations

the alleged violation of article 21 of theLSSI, classified as minor infractions according to article 39.1.c) of said textlegal.1. APPOINT RRR as an instructor

additional information may be requested, as follows from Article 12, sixth paragraph, of the GDPR . 5.1. By default, the Commission asks people who submit a

on January 29, 2020, pursuant to Art. 10, para. 1 of the Personal Data Protection Act, respectively Art. 57, § 1 (f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the

violation of article 6.1. RGPD, typified in article 83.5.a), and article 31, in relation to article 58.1.e), both of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5.e) of

Article 58(1)(e) in conjunction with Article 83(1) to (3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27

connection with Article 5 paragraph 1 point c, Article 9 paragraph 1, Article 58 paragraph 2 point f, point g and point i and with Article 83 paragraph 2

subject pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR, for a theft of their personal identity and financial data, because it violated Article 32(1) GDPR which led to a

infringement of Article 5.1 b) in conjunction with Article 6.4. AVG, on article 5.1 a) in conjunction with article 6.1. AVG and on article 5.1 c) GDPR has

violates Article 17.1(c) AVG. 3.2. With regard to the infringement of Article 6.1 and Article 21.4 of the AVG 29. In its statement of defence of 10 October

connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(e) in connection with Article 83(1-3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the

personal images, in violation of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR? The Spanish DPA (AEPD) found that the defendant's conduct violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, as a broader principle

(1)-(3), Article 83 (5)(e) in connection with Article 31, Article 58 (1)(e), Article 58 (2)(i) of Regulation EU 2016/679 of the European Parliament and

limit mandated by Article 33(1). Did the secretariat of the DPA breach its data security obligations under Articles 32(1), 33(1), and 34(1)? The Datatilsynet

1781) in connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(a) in connection with Article 83(1)-(3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation EU 2016/679 of the European

necessity is maintained under Article 6.1 b) to f) of the GDPR and therefore in Article 6.1.c) invoked in the species. Article 6.1 of the GDPR in fact reproduces

personal data pursuant to Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679". Article 70.1 of the LOPDGDD indicates the subjects responsible. "1. They are subject to the

Paragraph 1 Clause 1 DSG M-V a. F.). The official data protection officer is responsible in accordance with Section 19 Paragraph 2 Sentence 1 DSG M-V a

data portability; c) when the treatment is based on article 6, paragraph 1, letter a), or the Article 9, paragraph 2, letter a), the existence of the right

the time of the audit, there had been a breach of Article 37(7) GDPR. Regarding the breach of Article 38(1) GDPR, the DPA considered that the DPO had not

alleged infringement of Article 37.1 b) of the RGPD, in relation to Article 34.1 ñ) of the LOPDGDD, typified in accordance with article 83.4 of the RGPD. FIFTH:

submits that Article 77 AVG 2, interpreted in the light of Articles 1, 51(1) and 57 AVG, recitals 7, 10 and 141 AVG, Article 8 Charter and Article 16 TFEU,

assessment on the wording of Article 85 GDPR, The Norwegian Constitution § 100, The European Convention of Human Rights Article 10, and the International Covenant

merits 37/2021 - 10/15 condition of necessity is maintained under Article 6.1 b) to f) of the GDPR. The article 6.1 of the GDPR replaces Article 7 of the Directive

and to handle complaints in that regard in accordance with Article 10/1, §1, and Article 10/7, §4, of the Decree of 18 July 2008 on the electronic administrative

aanvullende bepalingen verwerking persoonsgegevens in de zorg'). Section 10.1.1 and 13.2.1 of the NEN 7510 highlight that healthcare providers should develop

Articles 5(1)(a) and (c), 6(1)(b) and (c) and 9(1)(b) of the Regulation. Therefore, having regard to the remedial powers granted by Article 58(2) of the

TELEPHONE. 1 that appears on the website corresponds to C.C.C., with DNI *** NIF.1 and installation address on the street *** ADDRESS.1, *** LOCALITY. 1.  After

provided for in Article 83.5.b) in relation to Article 13; and third, an infringement provided for in Article 83.4.a) in relation to Article 28 all of them

violation of Article 6(1)(e) and 6(1) GDPR - The lack of information on the identity of the controller and the DPO amounts to a violation of Article 13(1)(a) and

regulated in article 6 of the GDPR. The assumptions that allow the processing of personal data to be considered lawful listed in article 6.1 of the GDPR: 1. Treatment

connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(e) and (f) in connection with Article 83(1-3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and

the fine forfeited by Menzis. 2. Text of the offence and charge section 1 2.1 Text of the infringement The breach of the order subject to periodic penalty

court referred to Article 43(1),(2) Law N. 158 (I)/1999, which is the Cypriot Law on General Principles of Administrative Law. Article 43(1) Law N. 158 (I)/1999

without complying with the requirements of § 96 para. 1 no. 3 of the Labor Constitution Act or § 10 para. 1 of the AVRAG. In its appeal, the defendant requests

Articles 5(1)(a), 12(1) and 13(1)(c) GDPR within three months, to refer not only to information provided on data processed pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) GDPR

refers to the Privacy Ordinance Article 6 No. 1 letter f as the relevant valid basis for processing, as well as Article 21 No. 1 on the data subject's right

(Datenschutzbehörde - DSB) held that the doctor had violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 9(1) and (2) GDPR as the patients had not given their ecplicit

*** COMPANY.1., With NIF *** NIF.1, for a violation of the article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5. a) of the RGPD, a fine of € 10,000 (ten thousand

for the alleged violation of Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, in relation to article 5 of the LOPDGDD, as indicated in article 83.5 a) of the RGPD. FIFTH: Once

Guarantor pursuant to Article 166(7) of the Code" (Article 16(1) of the Regulation of the EDPS). 16(1) of the Garante's Regulation No. 1/2019). In this regard

expression under Article 10 ECHR. Lastly, whether a member state can provide more extensive protection for personal data than that provided under Article 13 Directive

prevent a data breach (Article 32 GDPR). Does the plaintiff have a right to compensation according to Article 82(1) GDPR and does Article 82(3) GDPR stipulate

approved appeal of Article 5(1)(a), Article 12(1), Article 13(1) and Article 13(2). The appeal for Article 5(1)(c), Article 6(1) and Article 8 GDPR was not

Management Page on 06/10/2019 and on 20/10/2019 that were observed by the Inspection Service on the website on 17/10/2019 and on 20/10/2019 respectively,

the same date (see Article 94 GDPR). That the initiating petition in this case dates from 22 May 2018 and that Article 48, paragraph 10 of the (Dutch) Implementation

[The equivalent GDPR Article to Article 48(3)(a) EU GDPR is Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, and Article 50(1)(d) EU GDPR is Article 49(1)(d) GDPR.] Share blogs

measures 1. Principles 52. In accordance with Article 12 of the Law of 1 August 2018, the National Commission has the powers provided for in Article 58.2 of

meaning of article 4, opening words under 1, 2 and 15, of the AVG, article 10 of the AVG and article 1, preamble below and b, of the Wb and article 16 of the

BVWG: 2021: W211.2230221.1.00 In RIS since 10/01/2021 Last updated on 10/01/2021 Document number BVWGT_20210903_W211_2230221_1_00

discontinued. Pursuant to Article 28(2) of the VwGVG, the Administrative Court must decide on complaints under Article 130(1)(1) of the Federal Constitution

of a finding under article 15 of the GDR instead of the provisions of article 15 of the GDR. 36, § 4 and § 5 as well as Article 38, § 1 of the Law of 30

(see “1.2.4- As regards the complaint according to which the defendant hadless time than the complainant to prepare his arguments ”).1.1.1. Place1.1.1.1.-

processing under Article 6(1), and failing to comply with the obligation to provide information under Article 13 GDPR. On the topic of Article 6(1) GDPR the Norwegian

Commission, or in the case of transfers referred to in Article 46 or 47, or the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), reference to the appropriate or suitable safeguards

Articles 2.1, 4 2), 5.1 c) and 57.1 a), f) and h) GDPR, to the extent necessary read in conjunction with Article 288(2) TFEU and Articles 4 § 1, 63, 72 and

artikel 100, §1, 2° WOG de buitenvervolgingstelling bevelen, of de klacht seponeren overeenkomstig artikel 95, §1, 1° of artikel 100, §1, 1° WOG (naargelang

the defendant on the basis of Article 100.1, 5 ° LCA given the breach noted in Article 6 of the GDPR combined with Article 5.1.a) of GDPR; - To dismiss the

protection regulation article 6 no. 1 letter f, for failure to assess protests, cf. article 21 and for missing information, cf. Article 13. X AS has also complained

presented under Article L. 761-1 of the Code of administrative justice must, therefore, be rejected. DECIDES: -------------- Article 1: The request of

municipality €409,768 (NOK 4,000,000) for breaches of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 24 GDPR and Article 32 GDPR after a serious ransomware attack led to highly

infringement of article 21.1 of the LSSI, typified in Article 38.4.d) of theLSSI, a sanction of warning.B) For an infringement of article 13 of the RGPD

investigation conferred on the supervisory authorities in Article 57 (1) of the GDPR.Thus, on 31/10/18, an information injunction was sent to the entity in

described violates article 6.1. of the RGPD and is subsumable in the sanctioning type of the article 83.5.a, of the RGPD. IV Article 72.1.b) of the LOPDGDD

DSB cites Articles 5(1)(b) and (e), 9(2)(j), 89(1) GDPR and Section 7(1)(1) and (2)(1) GDPR. In particular, it follows from Article 9(2)(j) GDPR that the

the Guarantor pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code "(Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation no. 1/2019). The aforementioned

Clause 1 of the Liability Law, 9 Article 156, the second and third paragraphs of Article 157, the first paragraph of Article 166, Article 168, Article 262

Agency sanction to D. A.A.A., with NIF ***NIF.1, for a violation of Article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD, with a fine of €300 (three

court asked whether the joint control of data in accordance with Article 4(7) and Article 26(1) GDPR must be interpreted 'exclusively' as involving deliberately

Guarantor n. 1/2000; RAPPORTEUR Dr. Agostino Ghiglia; WHEREAS 1. The complaint against the Company and the preliminary investigation. 1.1. With a complaint

decision, or, in the case of transfers pursuant to Article 46 or 47 or the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), reference to adequate or appropriate safeguards

too sick to work. 1 2See, among other things, article 4 paragraph 1 SUWI and the ZBO register of the Dutch central government. See article 2 paragraph 2 SUWI

the Guarantor pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code "(Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation no. 1/2019). In this regard, taking

functions assigned to the control authorities in the article 57.1 and the powers granted in article 58.1 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection

intention to infringe either article 5(1)( c) or article 34(1) of the GDPR. Legal framework 8.1. Pursuant to Article 5(1)(c) of the GDPR “Personal Data

in which the municipality could check whether Article 6 information, Article 9 information and Article 10 information are processed in connection with the

particular the purpose limitation principle (Article 5.1 b) GDPR) and the principle of minimum data processing (Article 5.1 c) GDPR). This follows from both provisions

right to informational self-determination according to Article 1 (1) in conjunction with Article 2 (1) GG. The defendant was not able to eliminate the risk

with Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 GG, Art. 17 para. 1 lit. d) DSGVO, because her personal data is stored according to Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f. DSGVO had

the Guarantor pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code "(Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation no. 1/2019). The aforementioned

complies with Article 5 (1) (a) and Article 6 (1) (f) GDPR. Thus, the controller failed to comply with the accountability principle under Article 5 (2) GDPR

over whether he implements them. 13th 9 10gl. on § 9 BDSG and Art. 2 Paragraph 1 in conjunction with 1 Paragraph 1 GG: Lotz / Wendler, CR 2016, 31, 34. Martini

they should. The Commissioner held that CYTA violated articles 5 (1), 24 (1) and (2), 25 (1) and (2) and 32 of the GDPR and instructed CYTA to establish such

for infringement of Article 32 (1) lit. a DSGVO [German Penal Code]. (Storage of unhashed passwords) here: Fine notice Enclosure: 1 transfer form, cash

on the merits in accordance with Article 1 98 ff WOG , to: - on the basis of Article 58.2, c) AVG and Article 95, §1, 5° WOG to order the defendant that

based on Article 6(1)(c) GDPR. In particular, the appellant argued that pursuant to Article 6(3) GDPR, a public interest task under Article 6(1)(c) GDPR

Service and transferred to the Disputes Chamber pursuant to article 62, § 1 j° article 92, 1° WOG. 10. On 7 February 2020, the Disputes Chamber invites the parties

C/EX/7280-1/02-10-2018 document called the complainant to provide explanations regarding the complaint. With the under no. prot. C/EIS/8285/18-10-2018 in

4 11 3 18 so.h 5 8 3 10 INKG 6 8 5 7 teresa.lopez 7 7 5 6 Martin Baumann 8 7 4 6 matthias.vandamme 9 6 4 5 nikolaos.konstantis 10 6 2 6 nho23 11 5 2 5

entitled to information under Article 15(1) GDPR is also, independently, entitled to receive copies pursuant to Article 15(3) GDPR. Both paragraphs concern

the Personal Data Act § 23 and the Privacy Ordinance Article 58 no. 1. Pursuant to Article 58 no. 1 letter a, the Authority has the competence to: "Instruct

207 of August 1 , 2016, p. 1-112.) To a specific ADEQ uaatheidsregeling for the US in the life called within the meaning of Article 45.1 AVG. 12. The Court

infringement of the article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, infringement typified in its article 83.5.a) of the aforementioned regulation. IV. Article 83.5 a) of the GDPR

by the DPA under Article 100 § 1, 6, 10 and 12 of the LCA. The complainant y also denounces a breach of Article 5.1. c) and Article 5.1. e) of the GDPR

II. 1. On the reasons for the decision A. On the breach related to the obligation of transparency 1. On the principles 10. According to Article 12.1 of

controller The matter has been clarified by the registrar on 16.11.2020, 7.1.2021 and 21.1.2021. According to the report received from the registrar on 16 November

appropriate measures and breached the storage limitation principle enshrined in Article 5(1)(e) GDPR, and also failed to fulfill its obligation under Articles 25

" *** DIRECCION.2 *** *** LOCALIDAD.1 CCAA.1 " . In section“ NIF ” the *** NIF.1. And in the section " Telephone 1" the mobile number*** PHONE . 2. The

Österreichische Post AG Status: May 2018 1. who is fiJr responsible for handling your data? 1.1 Austrian Post AG, Rochusplatz 1, 1030 Vienna ("Post", "we", "us")

having knowledge of the following: 1.1 In general, marketing actions can be classified attending to several criteria. 1.1.1. Campaigns managed directly by

that the disclosure lacked legal basis, and was in violation of Article 6(1) and Article 5(1)(a) of the GDPR. The recordings had already been handed over

pursuant to Article 17.1 GDPR , and that the data controller subsequently confirmed the deletion of her account, as required by Article 12(3) and (4) 1 1. The

what exactly he does with the recorded images” (folio nº 1). SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, of Protection

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; § 1 paragraph 1 and 2, § 18 paragraph 1 and § 24 paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG)

particular in Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. f, Art. 24 Para. 1 sentence 1, Art. 25 Para. 1 and Para. 2 sentence 1, Art. 28 Para. 1 and Art. 89 Para. 1 sentence 2 (...). The

breach of the obligations under article 5 (1) (c) of the Regulation. Failure to inform individuals of the following Article 13 of the Regulation requires

violation of the provisions of Article 5(1)(a), Article 6(1), Article 7(3), Article 12(2), Article 17(1)(b) and Article 24(1) of Regulation 2016/679 imposes

(LOPDGDD) in its article 72, under the heading "Infractions considered very serious ”provides: "1. Based on what is established in article 83.5 of the Regulation

address by the defendant under Article 6(1) GDPR? Did the controller infringe the data minimisation principle under Article 5(1)(c) GDPR? Did the controller

services (hereinafter LSSI), in accordance with article 43.1 of said Law. II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure

company 1&1 Internet España, S.L. (hereinafter 1&1) with whom you have a contract as a processor. The attack was carried out by the Group ***GROUP.1 as published

GDPR (Article 57, 1., a) GDPR), and the performance of all other related tasks with the protection of personal data (Article 57, 1., v) GDPR). 10 49. In

and the DPA determined that the legal grounds of Article 6(1)(b), 6(1)(c), Article 6(1)(d) and Article 6(1)(e) GDPR were not applicable in this case. It also

European Union for a preliminary ruling pursuant to Article 267 TFEU: (1) Does the award of damages under Article 82 of the GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the

the provisions of Article 5(1)(a), 5(1)(f), and Article 6(1)(a) GDPR) and €50 (for violating Article 58(1)(a), 58(1)(e) and Article 83(5)(e) GDPR). Thus

information duty included in Article 13 GDPR. Is this a violation of Article 13 GDPR? The AEPD held that there had been a violation of Article 13. According to the

client system is covered by the Law Enforcement Act, cf. section 1 (1) of the Act. 1. The Data Inspectorate has in particular emphasized that the Swedish

Dispute Resolution Chamber validly found a breach of Article 21.1 AVG and Article 12.3 AVG - If Article 21.1 AVG imposes an obligation on the controller to make

the basis of Article 58, paragraph 2, point b) GDPR and Article 100, §1, 5 ° WOG to be reprimanded for the infringement of Article 25 (1) GDPR; b. on the

also found no violation of Article 18(1)(c) GDPR by taking the above circumstances into account. It reasoned that Article 18(1)(c) GDPR also requires a balancing