Search results

processing (Article 36(3)(c) GDPR); the contact details of the Data Protection Officer (DPO) (Article 36(3)(d) GDPR); a copy of the DPIA (Article 36(3)(e) GDPR)

that Article 36(1) GDPR provides for a duty to consult if two conditions are met. First, a data protection impact assessment under Article 35 GDPR must

access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction (Article 18 GDPR), notification (Article 19 GDPR) or data

compliance with the GDPR. Article 28(3)(h) GDPR enables such a task in case processors are used. According to Article 28(3)(h) GDPR, the processor should

commentary to Article 60 GDPR, Article 61 GDPR, Article 62 GDPR, Article 63 GDPR, Article 64 GDPR, Article 65 GDPR, Article 66 GDPR and Article 56 GDPR. The SA

exercise on their behalf all rights foreseen under Articles 77 and 78 GDPR and Article 20 of L. 4624/2019. The mandate shall be given with a specific written

access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction of processing (Article 18 GDPR), notification obligation

freedoms of individuals", as stated in Article 35(1) and further elucidated in Article 35(3) and Article 35(4) GDPR. The WP29 developed a list of criteria

consent under Article 7(3), object under Article 21 GDPR or if the processing is in fact compliant with the principles of Article 5(1) GDPR. Simply listing

falls outside the scope of Article 57 GDPR should be deemed inadmissible for the purposes of Article 31 GDPR. Article 31 GDPR can be read as a supporting

from any of the GDPR’s protections. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 39 GDPR Just as Article 38 GDPR, Article 39 GDPR also shows similarities

categories of data established in Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, Article 9(2)(c) GDPR, Article 9(2)(g) GDPR and Article 9(2)(i) GDPR directly correlate with a specific

Regulation (GDPR), Article 82 GDPR, p. 1162, 1164, 1175. (Oxford University Press 2020); Quaas, in BeckOK DatenschutzR, Article 82 GDPR, margin number 3 (C.H

Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 38 GDPR, p. 707 (Oxford University Press 2020). Bergt, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 38 GDPR, margin number

between Article 21(3) GDPR and Article 17 GDPR on the right to erasure must be considered. The tight relationship between Article 21(3) and Article 17(1)(c)

processing), Article 57 GDPR (tasks of SAs), Article 58 GDPR (powers of SAs), as well as Article 65 GDPR (dispute resolution by the board), Article 63 GDPR (consistency

not directly mentioned by Article 33(3)(b)-(d) GDPR could be shared as additional information by the controller Article 34(3) GDPR lists three exemptions

further details see Article 14(1)(d) GDPR. Similar to the ex-ante information in Article 13(1)(e) and 14(1)(e) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR requires the controller

of each Member State (Article 68(3) GDPR). The EDPS is a member, but has only limited voting rights pursuant to Article 68(6) GDPR. In this respect, the

are dealt with in Article 12(6) GDPR. It is unclear why Article 12(2) GDPR refers to Articles 15 to 22 GDPR, while Article 11(2) GDPR only refers to Articles

respect of Article 33. If a controller who is not established in the EU but falls under the scope of Article 3(2) or Article 3(3) of the GDPR experiences

this purpose (Article 52(4)(5)(6) GDPR). Elements of SAs' complete independence are also addressed in Article 53 GDPR and Article 54 GDPR. The CJEU in the

consent under Article 6(4) GDPR and further processing for a compatible purpose under Article 6(4) GDPR. See the commentary on Article 6(4) GDPR for details

related decisions in Category:Article 26 GDPR Petri, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 26 GDPR, margin number 12 (C.H. Beck

relevance of Article 29 GDPR were rooted in the fact that Article 28(3)(b) GDPR already seems to cover much of the scope of Article 29 GDPR. More specifically

limit the application of the GDPR. You can find further details about the territorial scope in Article 3 GDPR. According to Article 1(2), the Regulation generally

shall apply from 25 May 2018. There is no relevant recital for Article 99 GDPR. Article 99 GDPR sets out the dates of the Regulation's entry into force and

years as per Article 45(3) GDPR, and subject to regular reporting, which Article 97(2) GDPR provides for. The third paragraph of Article 97 GDPR, obliges the

Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 32 GDPR, p. 636 (Oxford University Press 2020). Jandt, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 32 GDPR, margin number

protected by Article 96 GDPR if it is found to be incompatible with other GDPR provisions. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 96 GDPR It follows

process them. This was already the case under Article 8(7) of the DPD, the precursor of Article 87 GDPR. In many Member States, the processing of NIN and

under the GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 94 GDPR Kühling, Raab, in Kühling, Buchner, GVO BDSG, Article 94 GDPR, margin numbers

(e.g. Article 25 (1) and (2), Article 28(1), Article 32(1) GDPR, Article 89(1) GDPR). These measures can also be regarded as measures under Article 24(1)

Regulation (GDPR), Article 76 GDPR, p. 1111-1112 (Oxford University Press 2020). Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article

decisions in Category:Article 74 GDPR For more on this point, see Article 72 GDPR. Dix in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 74 GDPR, margin number 7 (C

use of trusted third party verification services. Article 8(3) GDPR makes it clear that Article 8(1) GDPR only refers to consent, not to the object of the

enforcement of the GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 59 GDPR Selmayr, in Ehmann, Selmayr, DS-GVO Kommentar, Article 59 GDPR, margin number

Category:Article 67 GDPR See EDPB, State of Play - IMI for GDPR purposes, 27 June 2018 (available here). See EDPB, 2019 Annual Report, Section 4.3.1 (available

important to note that Article 13(1)(f) GDPR, Article 14(1)(f) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR and Article 15(2) GDPR, make specific reference to transfers of personal

from Article 6(1) GDPR and comply with the principles enshrined in Article 5 GDPR. Additionally, the processing will still be subject to other GDPR provisions

subject to the GDPR or, in cases where they are not established in the EU, act within the material and territorial scope of the GDPR. Article 48 GDPR refers to

organisation), Article 45(5) GDPR (revocation, change of such determinations); Articles 46(2)(c) and (d) GDPR (standard protection clauses); Article 47(3) GDPR (formats

to in Article 46(2)(d) GDPR, contractual clauses referred to in Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, or binding corporate rules within the meaning of Article 47 GDPR

Regulation. Noting that a broader reading of Article 98 GDPR is supported by the wording of Article 2(3) GDPR, which provides that: 'For the processing of

Regulation (GDPR), Article 7 GDPR, p. 350 (Oxford University Press 2020). Heckmann, Paschke, in Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 7 GDPR, margin

Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 75 GDPR, p. 1105 (Oxford University Press 2020). Dix, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 75 GDPR, margin number 6

proposed amendments to the GDPR (pursuant to Article 70(1)(b) GDPR). Although not explicitly mentioned in Article 69(2) GDPR, the requirement that the Board

practices published under Article 70(3) GDPR. Though Article 70(3) GDPR already obliges the EDPB to make these public, Article 71(2) GDPR ensures that the public

derogation from Article 64(3) and Article 65(2), an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall be adopted

relying on another legal basis under Article 6 GDPR, or can use either of the exceptions under Article 17(3) GDPR, the processing can carry on. The controller

Recital 167 GDPR and Article 291 TFEU, the aim of implementing acts is to “ensure uniform conditions for implementing” the GDPR. In its GDPR Certification

exchange of knowledge between them. This way, Article 50 GDPR expands the exhortation under Article 57(1)(g) GDPR that calls for cooperation between EU DPAs

situation, Article 95 GDPR will not be relevant, and the GDPR applies as normal. Notably, Recital 173 GDPR, which relates to Article 95 GDPR, omits reference

conduct under Article 83 GDPR should be excluded from penalties issued under Article 84 GDPR is debated. Whilst the wording of the GDPR is simply unclear

simple majority principle under Article 72(1) GDPR would have applied regardless of Article 73(1) GDPR. In addition, the GDPR explicitly legislates for a simple

decisions pursuant to Article 65 GDPR (Article 70(1)(t) GDPR). Article 68 GDPR is the first of nine Articles (Articles 68-76 GDPR) governing the EDPB set

affected since, under Article 28(1) GDPR, a controller shall only use processors providing the same standards under Article 25 GDPR. Manufacturers or producers

(see Article 52 GDPR) and shall be provided with various competencies (Articles 55, 56 GDPR), tasks (Article 57 GDPR) and powers (Article 58 GDPR). For

requirements of Article 5(1)(d) GDPR are not complied with. In such cases, there is no need to exercise the rights under Article 16 GDPR - but also no harm

objections pursuant to Article 92(5) GDPR. Article 92(5) GDPR imposes a further condition for the delegation of power, in line with Article 290(2)(b) TFEU. A

64(2) GDPR). The remaining paragraphs of Article 64(3)-(8) GDPR lay down substantive rules and a detailed procedure for the EDPB’s opinions. Article 64(1) GDPR

with the GDPR (Article 31 GDPR). Direct liability of the representative is limited to the obligations set out in Article 30 and Article 58(1)(a) GDPR. Article

see commentary to Article 51(3) GDPR bellow. Article 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ("CFR") and Article 16(2) of the Treaty

standards of clarity (Article 61(3) GDPR). Requests are imperative and, subject to specific exceptions (Article 61(4) and (5) GDPR), must be fulfilled and

ng, Article 62 GDPR, margin number 11 (Beck 2018, 2nd edition). Riccio, Scorza, Belisario, GDPR e normativa privacy – Commentario, Article 62 GDPR (Wolters

resolution mechanism under Article 65 GDPR in connection with Article 63 GDPR is triggered (Article 60 (4) GDPR). Article 60(2) GDPR clarifies that also in

Category:Article 11 GDPR Georgieva, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 11 GDPR, p. 395

compliance with the GDPR under Article 58(2)(d) GDPR or even ban it under Article 58(2)(f) GDPR. Therefore, complaints under Article 77 GDPR should extend to

leeway exists only in cases of Article 64(2) GDPR but not the context of Article 70(2) GDPR. According to Article 70(3) GDPR, the EDPB is obligated to “forward

accordance with Article 58(1) GDPR. Article 90 GDPR was drafted with a view to regulate potential conflicts between the application of the GDPR on the one hand

access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), deletion (Article 17 GDPR), restriction of processing (Article 18 GDPR), objection (Article 21 GDPR)

requirements of data minimization (Article 5(1)(c) GDPR) and storage limitation (Article 5(1)(e) GDPR). Under Article 30(1)(f) GDPR, where possible, the controller

or processor should be approved pursuant to Article 58(3) GDPR, or by the EDPB pursuant to Article 63 GDPR. Where such an approval takes place through

Category:Article 47 GDPR Kuner, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Update of Selected Articles, Article 68 GDPR, p

Press 2020). Spiecker et al., GDPR Article-by-Article Commentary (2023), p 1090. Spiecker et al., GDPR Article-by-Article Commentary (2023), p 1090. CJEU

provided for in Article 6(1)(a) GDPR or, as the case may be, Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, and consent is withdrawn according to Article 7(3) GDPR, data must be

explicit wording of Article 81 GDPR does not limit its application to proceedings instigated either under Article 78 GDPR or Article 79 GDPR. Secondly, the

Kühling/Buchner, DSGVO, Article 2 GDPR, margin number 15 (C.H. Beck 2020, 3rd edition). Bäcker, in Wolff, Brink, BeckOK Datenschutzrecht, Article 2 GDPR, margin number

clear from the wording of Article 41(1) GDPR. Article 41(1) GDPR does not define accreditation. Nonetheless, Article 41(2) GDPR provides a criterion against

and (3) GDPR), inform him or her about the measures taken (Article 12(3) and (4) GDPR), the right to receive this service free of charge (Article 12(5)

opening clause under Article 88(1) GDPR, any rules introduced must meet the criteria imposed by Article 88(2) GDPR. Lastly, Article 88(3) GDPR imposes an obligation

into force of the GDPR. Spiecker et al., GDPR Article-by-Article Commentary (2023), p 1073. Spiecker et al., GDPR Article-by-Article Commentary (2023)

out pursuant to Article 83(1) GDPR. This part of Article 83 concerns the principle of "unity of action" (see above). With Article 83(3) GDPR, the legislator

occupation. For example, Article 52(2) GDPR requires SA members to remain free from external influence and Article 52(3) GDPR entails a prohibition of

pursuant to Article 77 GDPR. Lastly, the NPO may file a legal remedy under Article 79 GDPR against a controller or processor regarding a GDPR infringement

with Article 13, Article 14 GDPR gives expression to the principle of transparency enshrined in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and further defined in Article 12 GDPR

which would be competent under Article 55(1) GDPR, as provided in Article 56 GDPR in connection with Article 60 GDPR. For more information see commentary

adequacy decision pursuant to Article 45 GDPR shall be used, when it exists; second, appropriate safeguards under Article 46 GDPR, such as binding corporate

Regulation (GDPR), Article 91 GDPR, p. 1263 (Oxford University Press 2020). Tosoni, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article

and interpretation as in Article 22(3) GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 22 GDPR Article 20 of GDPR proposal, COM(2012) 11 final

under Article 79 GDPR – or both. This flexibility allows for parallel proceedings under both Article 77 GDPR and under Article 79 GDPR. As the GDPR foresees

DS-GVO BDSG, Article 78 GDPR, margin number 6 (C.H. Beck 2020, 3rd edition); Körffer in Paal, Pauly, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 78 GDPR, margin numbers 3-5, (C.H

Hence, Article 89(2) and (3) GDPR also allow for specific derogation to the GDPR for these purposes, as further detailed below. Article 89(1) GDPR provides

all related decisions in Category:Article 3 GDPR EDPB, ‘Guidelines 3/2018 on the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3)’, 12 November 2019 (Version 2.1)

lead SA (“LSA”) (Article 65(1)(b) GDPR), and where a SA is not following an opinion of the EDPB (Article 6(1)(c) GDPR). Article 65(1)(a) GDPR addresses the

categories of data under Article 9 GDPR or data relating to criminal convictions and offences under Article 10 GDPR. Article 37(2) GDPR allows for the designation

provided for in Article 52(3) GDPR and Articles 53(3) and 53(4) GDPR. For more information on SA members and staff, please refer to Article 52(2) GDPR (SA members)

requirements. Although Article 40(5) GDPR mentions that the competent DPA will be determined through the application of Article 55 GDPR, the GDPR does not provide

EDPB in accordance with Article 70(1)(b) GDPR. According to Article 45(5) GDPR, the continued monitoring referred to in paragraph 3, or other information

proportionate (Article 7 and 8 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights) and in compliance with Article 6(2) and (3) GDPR. According to Article 6(3) GDPR, the legal

refusal to take action on a data subject’s request (Article 12(4)). The first sentence of Article 20(3) GDPR clarifies that the exercise of the right to data

of such processing (see Article 5(1)(b) GDPR), the requirement to have a legitimate basis laid down by law (see Article 6(1) GDPR), the right to access and

protection regulation's article 5, subsection 2, cf. Article 5, subsection 1, letter a, Article 24, cf. Article 28, subsection 1, Article 35, subsection 1, as

online booking platform, for failing to comply with Article 12(3) GDPR and because Article 6(1)(f) GDPR was not a valid legal basis to publish personal data

protection within the meaning of Article 45 of the GDPR and without appropriate safeguards within the meaning of Article 46 of the GDPR. Furthermore, the plaintiff

request, violating GDPR Article 12(3) and Article 15. The delay also led to the deletion of requested data, violating Article 5(1) GDPR. A complainant legally

processor, see Article 28(3)(a) GDPR. Document that all transfers of personal data to insecure third countries, are in line with the GDPR. Describe all

approved appeal of Article 5(1)(a), Article 12(1), Article 13(1) and Article 13(2). The appeal for Article 5(1)(c), Article 6(1) and Article 8 GDPR was not approved

the Article 33 GDPR. The DPA also ordered the controller to communicate the data breach to the affected data subjects pursuant to Article 34 GDPR. The

ASEP asked the HDPA for a prior consultation according to Article 36(1) and 36(3)(b) GDPR after it carried out a DPIA, which showed that the mentioned

the public interest, per Article 6(1)(e) GDPR, and was also necessary for scientific research purposes under Article 9(2)(j) GDPR. Thirdly, that the data

Articles 5(1)(a) GDPR and 13 GDPR. On the other hand, they disagreed with the infringement of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR in relation to Article 9(1) GDPR with regard

that a controller is allowed to reject a request to access under Article 12(5)(b) GDPR as "excessive" if the request's sole purpose is to verify the validity

processing. In accordance with Article 36 GDPR, the Garante must decide on the adequacy of the intended processing under the GDPR. After careful examination

right to access under Article 15 GDPR because the controller was entitled to reject the request pursuant to Article 12(5)(b) GDPR. The court reasoned that

authority (cf. Article 36 (2) no. 7 lit. a DPA) for the purposes of military self-protection (cf. Article 36 (1) DPA in conjunction with Article 2 (1) no. 2

communications under Article 14 GDPR were not legally necessary, as in the present case, Article 23 GDPR restrictions were applicable. Article 23 GDPR establishes

adopt corrective measures as per Article 58(2) GDPR, and that, although there was a violation of Articles 5(1)(a) and (e) GDPR, “the circumstances referred

therefore of the opinion that no breach of Article 5.2 of the GDPR, Article 24.1 of the GDPR and Article 33 of the GDPR can be established. - As regards the

that “Recital 65 of the GDPR also includes the exception of the legal defense as provided for in article 17.3.e of the GDPR to the right to erasure",

Pursuant to Article 83 GDPR in conjunction with Article 4 No. 7 and 8 GDPR, fines for violations of the GDPR pursuant to Article 83(4) to (6) GDPR are not

reactivated according to plan. It follows from Article 28 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation Article 3 (3) (f) requires the data controller to assist the

publicly available on the Internet. However, it follows from Article 28(1) GDPR and Article 28(3)(f) GDPR that the data processor (in this instance Kombit A/S)

[The equivalent GDPR Article to Article 48(3)(a) EU GDPR is Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, and Article 50(1)(d) EU GDPR is Article 49(1)(d) GDPR.] Share blogs or

by the alleged violation of Article 32 of the RGPD, Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, Article 25 of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD. FOURTH: On

of personal data of data subjects guaranteed by Article 44 GDPR and consequently breached Article 44 GDPR. The DPA issued a fine of 300,000 SEK (approx.

regarded as an access request under Article 15(1) GDPR. According to Recital 63 GDPR, the right of access under Article 15 GDPR serves data subjects to be informed

the social and health authority of a city to had breached Article 6 GDPR and Article 10 GDPR by requesting data subjects to provide it with personal data

violating Article 5(1) GDPR Article 6 (1) GDPR Article 6(4) GDPR Article 9 GDPR Article 14 GDPR Article 30 GDPR Article 35 GDPR and Article 36 GDPR. The fine

under Article 36 GDPR) regarding the compliance of the envisaged processing with the GDPR. According to the Commission, the legal basis was Article 6(1)(e)

the personal data to be provided pursuant to Article 15(1) GDPR: must Article 15(3) first sentence of the GDPR be interpreted as meaning that, due to the

meaning that no violation of Article 5(1)(e) GDPR could be established. Integrity and confidentiality - Article 5(1)(f) GDPR As explained above, the DPA

obligations under Article 5(1)(f) and Article 32 of GDPR. Article 5 (1) : Ticketmaster has failed to comply with the requirements of GDPR including to process

violates Article 32 GDPR. Retaining personal data of an applicant for a lease after another applicant has been selected also violates Article 5(1)(e) GDPR

obligation of Article 32 GDPR? - Does the fact that this health data is not encrypted constitute a breach of the security obligation under Article 32 GDPR? - Does

in line with the principle of lawfulness in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, as none of the conditions of Article 6 GDPR were satisfied. The data disclosed in the land

way of a finding under article 15 of the GDR instead of the provisions of article 15 of the GDR. 36, § 4 and § 5 as well as Article 38, § 1 of the Law of

images, in violation of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR? The Spanish DPA (AEPD) found that the defendant's conduct violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, as a broader principle

Union or Member State law required by Article 6(3) is given must comply. Room documents II 2017/18, 34851, No 3, p. 36. The same applies to Section 6, first

erasure provided for in Article 17 GDPR? b)      that person is not entitled to a right of objection as referred to in Article 21 GDPR? 3.      If the answer

for more details. Article 2: Material scope Article 2.2.c: Exclusively personal or domestic activity Article 3: Territorial scope Article 4.1: Personal data

entitled to erasure under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR, as the data processing was not lawful. In any case, the requirements of Article 6 GDPR were no longer met 6

data is a fundamental right. Article 8(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’) and Article 16(1) of the Treaty on the

II.3.3. Regarding the scope of Art. 44 ff GDPR: If the following three requirements are met, there is a transfer and Chapter V (Art. 44 ff) GDPR is applicable

within the meaning of Article 26 GDPR, as determined in section 2.3. 135. The legal provision on data protection by design, Article 25 GDPR, states expressly

but have requested a judgment, is incomprehensible. 3.29 3.30 3.31 3.32 3.33 6.9 3.34 3.35 3.36 3.37 The contested consideration of the court from para

April 2016 (General Data Protection Regulation - GDPR), in conjunction with Article 3, Article 4(2) and Article 6(1)(b), all of which are applicable to the

DE SA’s objection on Article 33(3) GDPR fails to meet the requirements set out in Article 4(24) GDPR Infringement of Article 34 GDPR on the communication

breached Article 5(1)(b) GDPR. Therefore, the DPA handed down a 'call to order' against the joint controllers for breaching Article 5(1)(b) GDPR, and no

more details. Article 2: Substantive scope Article 2.2.c: Exclusively personal or domestic activity Article 3: Territorial scope Article 4.1: Personal

territorial application of the requirements set out in Article 82 of the Data Protection Act is set out in Article 3, paragraph I, of the same Act, which states:

seriously impair the achievement of purposes pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. In principle, Article 89(3) GDPR contains an opening clause. This provision was also

interference that was unforeseeable for the defendant. As a result, under Article 82(3) the defendant cannot be held responsible for the processing of the claimant's

envisaged as follows. 17. In paragraph 3.3. Legal Protection' of the AVG Implementation Act, Article 34 reads as follows: Article 34. Applicability of the General

Those measures shall be reviewed and, where necessary, updated. Article 28.3 AVG "3. The processing by a processor shall be governed by a contract or

the basis of article 6.1 e) GDPR read together with articles 5.2 GDPR and 24.1 GDPR. 3) Violation of Articles 12.1, 12.6, 13.1 and 13.2 GDPR: the Inspection

based on article 7.3 of the GDMP. The Litigation Chamber considers Therefore, consent cannot be considered to have been given in an informed manner. 36. In

costs at law. 3.3. In the first instance, [the employee] put forward a substantiated defense seeking the rejection of Trigion's requests. 3.3.1. In the event

Data Authority2019 53 3.3Penaltyforviolatingthesecurityofprocessing 53 3.3.1 Nature, seriousness and duration of the infringement 54 3.3.2 Negligent nature

union enshrined in Article 7 of the Spanish Constitution. Therefore, such processing would be lawful in accordance with Article 6(1) GDPR. Share your comments

by the RGPD 36. Under the terms of Article 82 of the Data Protection Act, which constitutes the transposition into domestic law of Article 5(3) of Directive

(Datenschutzbehörde - DSB) held that the doctor had violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 9(1) and (2) GDPR as the patients had not given their ecplicit consent

issued an opinion as foreseen under Article 58(3) GDPR on the issue of the health data sharing under Article 9 GDPR in the employer - employee context.

Therefore, given that Article 6(1), Article 5(1)(a), Article 5(1)(d), Article 5(1)(c), and Article 14 GDPR were infringed in connection to Article 5(1)(b), the

case to the Irish DPA (DPC) under Article 56 GDPR, and in accordance with the procedure outlined in Article 60 GDPR. Responding to the Complainant’s assertions

directly on the basis of the GDPR, not the register assessed on the basis of Article 30(1) of the GDPR. II.3. Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR 49. Above, the Disputes

Privacy Regulation (GDPR) article 6 no. 1 letter f. GDPR applies according to the Personal Data Act § 1 as Norwegian law. Legelisten.no (3) Legelisten.no is

provided for in Article 56(1), read in conjunction with Article 56(2), read in conjunction with Article 56(3), read in conjunction with Article 56(4), read

based on Article 6.1.f) of the GDPR, but not for all processing based on this article. […] 73 74Investigation report, page 22, point 4.4.2.3.3. WP 260 rev

data laid down by Article 4(1) and (2) GDPR. The DPA then quotes ECJ, 11 December 2014, Ryneš, case C-212/13 (point 22), EDPB Guidelines 3/2019 on processing

former teachers to their colleagues and students was in violation of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Including the reason for dismissal was not necessary. A college

from the Law: "Article 36. Taxpayers 1. They are taxpayers, as taxpayers, natural or legal persons, and the entities referred to in article 35.4 of Law 58/2003

sections 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 of the DPIA, for clarity, the Commissioner also recommends that the Home Office links its purposes to both its Article 6(1)(e)

been taken up again at Article 5.1(b) of the GDPR under the Principles for the Processing of Personal Data (Chapter II). 16. Article 5.1(b) of the GDMP provides

violated Article 5(1)(e) GDPR and Article 25(2) GDPR. As a result, the DPA issued a reprimand to the controller in accordance with Article 58(2)(b) GDPR. Pursuant

condition of necessity is maintained under Article 6.1 b) to f) of the GDPR. The article 6.1 of the GDPR replaces Article 7 of the Directive, without the relevant

consent, in line with Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. The Court recalled that Article 31 of the Croatian Law on the Implementation of the GDPR stipulates that the

data, recorded in copies Article 6 (1) of the GDPR and, in the case of health data, Article 9 of the GDPR. Article 1 (1); (3) did not provide clear and

infringement of Article 32.1 of the GDPR typified as a serious infringement in Article 73 f) of the LOPDGDD and in Article 83.4 of the GDPR. For its part

aggravating circumstance according to Article 83(2)(i) or as a separate violation according to Article 83(5)(e) or Article 83(6). Since the situation at hand

within the meaning of Article 4 no. 2 of the GDPR and the term "transfer" within the meaning of Article 44 et seq. of the GDPR. GDPR had to be differentiated

violation of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR (LCEur 2016, 605) , typified in article 83.5.a) of the GDPR, a penalty of warning, of in accordance with article 77 of

of the CNIL 36. The rule of territorial application of the requirements set in Article 82 of the Data Protection Act is set out in Article 3, paragraph

basis under Article 6 GDPR to collect and process vehicle registration numbers. The legal basis is a statutory obligation prescribed by Article 229 of the

infringement of Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD typified in Article 83.5.a) of the RGPD and considered very serious, for the purposes of prescription, in Article 72.1

Constitution, Article 19 TFEU and Article 47 CFR. As Mr A's mandate and termination had not been assessed in the light of the provisions of the GDPR, the Supreme

freedoms that could not be mitigated, and referred to Article 36(1) GDPR and Article 36(2) GDPR. The DPA ordered the municipality to: Change the data processing

that the controller had not violated Article 45 GDPR nor any of the subsequent Articles from Chapter V of the GDPR. The AEPD took into account that the

rectification.(article 16 of the GDPR), the right to be forgotten (article 17 of the GDPR), and the right to limit the use ofdata processed unlawfully (article 18

analogously, Section 823 (1) and (2) BGB in conjunction with Article 6 (1) GDPR and Article 17 GDPR. Claims under data protection law could be asserted by way

under Article 17(3) GDPR. Two doctors sued a platform for deletion of their basic profile set up on the platform without their consent under Article 17 GDPR

the GDPR. According to the defendant, this partner is thus not processor within the meaning of Article 4 (8) GDPR. Consequently, Article 28 (3) GDPR does

the request within a period of one month (Article 12(3)). Accordingly, the controller infringed Article 12(3) GDPR with respect to its handling of the access

authentication via a third service provider cannot constitute a breach of Article 6 of the GDPR when it implies that the personal data of the data subjects are not

of his personal data would be based 5. 1, a) GDPR, Article 6, Article 12.1 GDPR and Article 14.1 a) GDPR. 67. Moreover, a controller, in this case defendant

of a permit. This is because, according to the first sentence of Article 6(3) of the GDPR, the legal basis for processing operations under this provision

Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 25, 32, 35 and 36 of the GDPR, Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 27 and 28 of Directive (EU) 2016/680, Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10

rowspan="2" width="3"><img src="http://www.dpa.gr:80/APDPXPortlets/images/menutop_space.jpg" width="3" height="104"></td><!--/*++++++++++++++++++++++++3 Υπομενού

additional submissions regarding Article 83(3) GDPR (“Meta IE Submissions on Article 83(3) GDPR”). December 2021 On3December2021,theIESAshareditsDraftDecisionwiththeCSAs

clause n ° 36 regarding - of article L.121-20-3 of the Consumer Code in its wording prior to the law of March 17, 2014 for all contracts, - of article R.132-1

requested prior consultation under Article 36(1) GDPR from the Dutch DPA Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens ("AP"). Article 36(1) GDPR requires a data controller to

this case under Article 6(1)(a) or 6(1)(c)? If Article 6(1)(a) applies, do the requirements for parental consent under Article 8 GDPR also apply? Did the

the existence or absence of a decision in accordance with Article 46, Article 47 or Article 49 (1). in the case of the transmission referred to in the

force: "According to Article 16 sentence 1 GDPR, every data subject has the right to request the controller (see Article 4(7) GDPR) to correct incorrect

obligations related to the processing operations pursuant to Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 14(5)(b) GDPR. In that case, the DPA recommended that the information

under Article 82 UK-GDPR and sections 168 and 169 of the Data Protection Act (DPA) 2018. The defendant applied for the claim to be struck out under 3.4(2)(a)

result of the violations of article 5.1 a), article 5.2, article 6.1, article 12.1, article 13.1 c) and d) and article 13.2 b) GDPR. 21. On 17 June 2020, the

data has infringed Article 5, Article 9, Article 35 and Article 36 of the Data Protection Regulation. These articles are covered by article 83.4 and 83.5 and

their employees. The DPA found a violation of Article 5(1)(b) GDPR, Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 13 GDPR. Following a visit to the premises of two public

instance, the controller sought to rely upon Article 6(1)(e) GDPR and Article 9(2)(j) GDPR. Article 6(1)(e) GDPR establishes a lawful basis for the processing

accordance with the Regulation, as provided for in article 24(1) of the Regulation. 36. As follows from article 36(4) of the Regulation, there is the obligation

DI-2019-7782 4 (22) infringements of Article 5 (1) (a), Article 6 (1), Article 9 (2), Article 13, Article 35 and Article 36 of the Data Protection Ordinance

scientific research purposes pursuant to Article 9(2)(j) GDPR, provided that appropriate safeguards under Article 89(1) GDPR are in place. These safeguards (e

portrait right. The paintiff also saw a violation of Articles 33, 35 and 36 of the GDPR, which the defendant has not contested. The Court found that the publication

under Article 15 GDPR to the defendant and requested i.a. information on concrete recipients of their personal data under Article 15(1)(c) GDPR. The defendant

section 3.3”. “3.3. Manifestation of informed will The GDPR reinforces the requirement that consent must be informed. in accordance with article 5 of the

and 13 GDPR? Is the information provided to data subjects throughout the subscription process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13 GDPR? Does

alleged violation of Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD and Article 32 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR and Article 83.4 of the GDPR respectively. SIXTH:

consultation. of the Guarantor pursuant to article 36 of the Regulation "(article 110 of the Code, article 9, paragraph 2, letter j) and par. 4 of the

conformity with the data subject’s rights of information under Article 13 GDPR and Article 14 GDPR, the hospital should firstly make clear what the legal basis

identify the data subject and it shall justify the reasons, as per Article 12(3) GDPR. AEPD stated that, with the documentation provided, the data subject

06/30/1934 DSG Art. 2 § 36 today DSG Art. 2 § 36 valid from December 1st, 2021 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 148/2021 DSG Art. 2 § 36 valid from May

analyzes the criteria by Article 83.2 of the GDPR: - As to the nature and seriousness of the violation [article 83.2 a) of the GDPR], with regard to breaches

period allotted to it to do so (Article 15.1 combined with Article 12.3. of GDPR as well as Article 12.2. of the GDPR (obligation to facilitate the exercise

assessment pursuant to Article 35 of the GDPR and, depending on the outcome, also have to consult the AP beforehand (Article 36 of the GDPR). In addition, as

Clause 1 GDPR) to the "How" (Article 15 Paragraph 1 Clause 2 lit. a-h, Paragraph 2 GDPR) to the "What" ( Art 15 para. 1 clause 2, para. 3 GDPR). If the

2, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3

of the processing pursuant to Article 5, paragraph 1, e) of the GDPR 19. According to Article 5, paragraph 1, e) of the GDPR, personal data must be kept

be erased and thus also violates Article 17.1(c) AVG. 3.2. With regard to the infringement of Article 6.1 and Article 21.4 of the AVG 29. In its statement

established on Article 45. Article 46.1 provides, among other things, that in the absence of a decision in accordance with Article 45.3 a personal data

to persons concerned by the GDPR, including the right to complaint (Article 77 of the GDPR - also recognized in Article 8.3. of the Charter of Rights Decision

meaning of Article 4 No. 7 GDPR. However, the defendant cannot be accused of violating an obligation to provide information under Art. 15, 12 GDPR. Paragraph

The heading of Article 6(1) and the wording “has given” in Article 6(1)(a) support this interpretation. It follows logically from Article 6 and Recital

this case? 3. At the time of the earlier decision by the defendant and its assessment by the ABRvS, the provisions of the Wbp applied. Article 36(3) of the

provided to the interested parties based on Article 13 GDPR and to non-contactable persons based on Article 14 GDPR. The information notice includes the right

DPO and to cooperate with the DPA, therefore violating Article 31 GDPR and Article 37(1)(a) GDPR. On 2 June 2021, the French DPA (“CNIL”) informed a French

(hereinafter: the GDPR) applies on 25 May 2018 become. The GDPR imposes the same obligation in Article 32, paragraph 1, as it applied under Article 13 6. The UWV

the file (Article 95, §2, 3 ° WOG) 7. On 7 August 2019, a copy of the file will be sent to the defendants. Page 3 Substance decision 35/2020 - 3/11 8. On

fairness principle, violating Article 5(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(e) GDPR, and Article 6 in conjunction with Article 8 Personal Data Protection

private doctor for violating Article 32 GDPR by making his patients' health data freely accessible on the web, and Article 33 GDPR by not notifying the DPA

information on defaults established by the authority pursuant to section 13 (1) (3) of the Credit Information Act, which had been established by unilateral court

not necessarily meet the requirements of Article 32 GDPR. To what extent are the provisions in Article 32 GDPR obligatory and thus, not subject to the preferences

held, that the powers of the DSB under the GDPR are extensive. Neither Article 55, Article 77 or Article 51 GDPR nor the DSG limit the DSB's competence regarding

right of access under Article 15 of the GDPR and the right to erasure (‘forgotten’) under Article 17 of the GDPR, Article 12 of the GDPR on measures to exercise

market participants. Specifically, these are Sections 17(3), 3(5) ApBetrO, 43 AMG, 11(1) sentence 1 no. 3, no. 7 and no. 11 HWG, and Section 14(2) no. 1 BerufsO

then enter a password before gaining access to the computer. 3.3.3 Control of logging 3.3.3.1 Facts The OLVG information security & privacy policy states

GDPR and Article 66.2 WOG); and • compliance with the transparency obligations (Article 12 GDPR) and the te provide information (Article 13 GDPR). Page

processor, Vamavi Phone SL, had violated Article 48(1) LGT, Article 21 GDPR in link with Article 23 LOPDGDD and Article 28 GDPR by making a commercial call on behalf

out in Article 12 (3) of the General Data Protection Regulation, the Debtor informed by electronic means on 7 March 2019, in accordance with Article 15 (1)

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ L 119, 4 May 2016, p. 1.: Article 4, Article 5 Paragraph 1 Letter c, Article 6, Article 12 Paragraph 3, Article 51 Paragraph 1

with the obligations under Article 6, §2, al. 5 and Article 9 of the Camera Act 1 2. there is a serious indication that article 6, § 2, al. 4 of the aforementioned

(see Article 19.2, Article 79.3 of the Basic Law) and ensures this protection also with regard to the Union Treaties (see Article 23.1 sentence 3 of the

force of the GDPR, the controller also sent him a separate revocation letter referring to the operational reasons under Article 38(3) GDPR, second sentence

and thus failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) GDPR, Article 24(1) GDPR and Article 28(1) GDPR. Second, the DPA found that, since the data processing

out by the school). Article 9 GDPR, for having processed biometric data without any valid ground from Article 9(2). Article 13 GDPR, for not having informed

security at all times”. 3.3.2Assessment From both article 13 of the Wb and article 32, first and second paragraph, of the GDPR it follows that the controller

specified in article 32 GDPR (security of processing). In determining the amount of the fine, certain aggravating factors of article 83 GDPR were considered

missions, applying all the exclusions provided for in article 2 of the GDPR. ”, Resulting from its article 3 under the heading“ National control authority ”that“The

processing personal data in violation of Article 5(2) GDPR, Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 24(1) GDPR and Article 32(1) GDPR. The DPA also requested the controller

publication of the press release of 17 June 2020 infringed Article 54(2) GDPR and Article 48(1) and Article 64(3) WOG. This press release described that the DPA was

also taken into account Article 5 GDPR, mainly the purpose limitation and data minimization principles, as well as Article 6 GDPR; the controller should

envisaged as follows. 22. In paragraph 3.3. Legal Protection' of the AVG Implementation Act, Article 34 reads as follows: Article 34. Applicability of the General

account that Article 9 (3) GDPR already regulates such a guarantee. 176 (4.3.) The requirements set out in Article 9 (2) (b) and (h) GDPR in conjunction

ofcontroller (article 4.7 of the GDPR), the scope of the GDPR (article3.1 of the GDPR), the right to erasure (article 17 of the GDPR) and its powers (article 58.2of

data, which he is free to do at any time under Article 7(3) of the GDPR. 5.12Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR provides that the processing of personal data may

transparency of processing enshrined in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and against the provisions of Article 12 GDPR and Article 13 GDPR. Share your comments here! Share

investigations the CNIL found five breaches of the GDPR: -         Violation of the right to object, Article 21(2) GDPR: no procedure was implemented to ensure effectively

Protection Regulation) Article 5, paragraph 1, subparagraph c, Article 25, Article 58, paragraph 2, subparagraph d, and Article 87, Section 29, subsection

some of the provisions of the GDPR and the "loi informatique et libertés". Regarding, on one hand, the violation of the GDPR, the CNIL reminded the Ministry

Data Protection Regulation. Pursuant to Article 8 (3) no. 2 UWG in conjunction with § Article 8 (1) and Article 3a UWG authorise competition associations

the distribution of the burden of proof for damages under Article 82 GDPR. Does Article 82 GDPR put the burden of proof for damages that result from a data

opening clause in Article 86 GDPR if the disclosure involves personal data? The court held that the VIG complies with Article 86 GDPR: The provisions of

found that the right to a copy under Article 15(3) GDPR is independent from the right to access under Article 15(1) GDPR and is to be construed extensively

violation of article 28.2 typified in Article 83.4 a) GDPR. SIXTY THOUSAND EUROS (€60,000) for alleged violation of article 28.3 typified in Article 83.4 a)

commit a breach of Article 12(3) GDPR? Did the controller fail to uphold its responsibilities under Article 24 GDPR? No lawful basis for processing: The

limitation of Article 5(1)(b) GDPR and against the provisions of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 6(1)(f) GDPR in conjunction with Article 6(4) GDPR. Further

applicable (cf. Article 99(1) and (3) AVG). As of that date, the AVG is binding and directly applicable in every Member State (Article 99(3) AVG), i.e.: irrespective

the light of Article 13 of the AVG. In this respect, the Inspectorate refers to column 3 of the table below.3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Privacy policy

(listed in Article 57 of the GDPR) including that of dealing with complaints (article 57.1.f) of the GDPR) as well as a number of powers (article 58 of the

with Article 5 (1) (a) and Article 6 (1) (f) GDPR. Thus, the controller failed to comply with the accountability principle under Article 5 (2) GDPR. Second

13, 14 GDPR), also the defendant clearly and in ease language pointed to the default settings, so no breach of Article 25 GDPR or Article 32 GDPR either

meaning of Article 82(1) GDPR has occurred, as a breach of the GDPR itself constitutes non-material damage. Recital 146, sentences 1 and 6 GDPR support this

which the person responsible is subject. In contrast to Article 6 (1) (b) GDPR, Article 6 (1) (c) GDPR with “legal obligation” does not mean a contractual

therefore an infringement of Article 5 at the time of the facts. 1, a) GDPR, Article 6, Article 12.1 GDPR and Article 14.1 a) GDPR. 90. In addition, a controller

have any right under Article 15(3) GDPR to a copy of the explanatory letter and attachments. The term “copy” in Article 15(3) GDPR refers to the personal

2019, GDPR Art. 37, para. 1; Döpfler , EU-GDPR and BDSG, 2nd edition 2020, GDPR Art. 37, marginal 1; Paal / Pauly, DS-GVO BDSG, 2nd ed. 2018, GDPR Art.

company was not compliant with Article 13 GDPR. The CNPD held that the controller infringed Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 13 GDPR and decided to: - impose

it should have under Article 60 GDPR - Article 61(8) GDPR applied, which meant that the urgent need to act under Article 66(1) GDPR was presumed to be met

of 40,000 to 400,000 euros ". 50.3 of Law 11/2007, of October 26, on Libraries of the Basque Country and article 54.3 of Law 16/2003, of December 22, of

right of access under Article 15 GDPR? By denying the complainant access, did the respondent infringe Articles 12(1) or 12(2) GDPR? The NAIH that the complainant's

examination of the prices and costs as referred to in Article 36. referred to in Article 36." Article 35 of the same Royal Decree provides as follows: "The

The provisions of Article 13 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation 1-3, Article 14, para. Paragraphs 1 to 4, Article 15 and Article 34 shall not apply

Officer (DPO) under Section 4 of Chapter 4 of the GDPR (see in particular Article 37 GDPR to Article 39 GDPR). One of these audit proceedings concerned a Luxembourg

provided for in Article 15(1) GDPR, which was kept by the Higher Administrative Court. The Court denied the request. Does Article 15 GDPR apply to hand written

by the GDPR, on the other, Article 28, paragraph 3 of the GDPR does not provide any indication regarding the obligation to conclude a deed of appointment

permission in Article 6 (1) (c) GDPR and argues that it is the Viennese in accordance with Article 5 (3) of the EpiG in conjunction with Article 1 (2) (e)

for such certification must be subject to adequate limitations as to insure GDPR compliance. Because the app mirrors the green certification—but is not the

complaint lodged under Article 77 of the GDPR, or proceedings based on Article 78(1) of the GDPR, is not precluded by the GDPR or any other provision of

11 660,859 297,410 -ewsletter 3 1,872,260 907,656 -ffers 'Come,back to 10 76,893 36,214 •card 6 633,520 302,409 'Explore' 36 375,955 219,514 'Card is 4 464

in the tax information portals had in any case violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 32 GDPR, because the large-scale and permanent publication of personal

accordance with Article 60(3) GDPR. Ten DPAs (AT, DE, ES, FI, FR, HU, IT, NL, NO, SE) raised objections, in accordance with Article 60(4) GDPR, to the Draft

arising from Article 15 of the GDPR. 3. On the breach relating to the obligation to respect the right of opposition (article 21 of the GDPR) 45. The rapporteur

privacy, as it identifies the car and not the person (...)." Pursuant to Article 4(1) GDPR, personal data refers to information about natural persons, not vehicles

principles to the GDPR;&#13; &#13; (b) The effect (if any) of the remaining claims – Article 5(1)(f) GDPR (the data security principle), the Article 8 claim and

02/2021 - 14/26 3. Motifs 3.1 Compétence de la Chambre de Résolution des Litiges (Article 2 AVG ; Article 4 WOG) 55. Conformément à l'article 2, paragraphe

provided for in Article 9 of the GDPR or Article 51 of the ZZLD. 30 Under Article 27 of the ZMVR, data recorded by the police pursuant to Article 68 of that

the basis of Article 2 (1) of the GDPR, the GDPR shall apply to the data processing in this case apply. (19) Article 5 (1) point c) GDPR: Personal data

its legal basis in Article 19 Paragraph 6 Clause 1 BayDSG in conjunction with Article 1, Article 2, Article 6 Paragraph 1 Clauses 2 and 3, Paragraph 2 KG

processing carried out is in violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32 GDPR and Article 35 GDPR. Especially, the controller cannot exclude

damages under Article 82 GDPR. The controller replied that data scraping - which is not hacking - does not entail a violation of the GDPR by the controller

is based on Article 9(2)(i) of the GDPR as mentioned above. 34. However, certain data referred to in the PIA are not mentioned in Article 2 of the draft

authorisation - Article 3.1 sentences 1, 3 and 5 of the ZwEWG; § 12.1 sentence 1 half 1, sentence 2 and sentence 4 of the ZeS. (para. 51)3. The service provider

incorrect applies Article 12.3 of the AVG. However, this is not correct. 33. Article 12.3 of the GDPR reads (in its relevant parts): ''Art. 12.3 The controller

pursuant to Article 58 (2) (b) of the GDPR. condemns the Applicant for violating Article 5 (1) (a) of the GDPR; (b) and (c), Article 6 and Article 9. (50)

registers removed is rejected. 6(1)(f) of the GDPR, [applicant] can rely on Article 21 of the GDPR. Article 21 GDPR gives a data subject the right to object

on the health professionals (article 17.3.b of the GDPR) and the legal defense of their rights (Article 17.3.e of the GDPR). 59. Finally, the defendant

breach of Article 28 paragraphs 3 and 4 of the GDPR is clear. 2. On the breach of the obligation to ensure data security 49. According to Article 32 of the

interpretation of the GDPR. Second, the court argued with the drafting history of the GDPR which connects Article 15(3) GDPR to Article 20(1) GDPR, showing that

positions in the areas referred to in Article 3 of the Ministerial Decree of 7 May 2019 (number of years), area of interest. 3. Preliminary assessments of the

internal compliance and accountability according to Article 5(1) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR and Article 6(1) GDPR. Since the company had totally ignored the its

Directive 2002/58 and Article 1 paragraph 2 and points 3, 10 and 51 of the GDPR) and in the domestic context also Article 10, paragraph 3 of the Charter (cf

violation of the Article 12 of the GDPR, in conjunction with Article 17 of the GDPR. V Classification of the infringement of article 12 of the GDPR The aforementioned

the data subjects, therefore breaching Article 6 GDPR, as well as Article 5(1)(b) GDPR. Thirdly, Article 30 GDPR stipulates that the controller must keep

Regulation) Article 1, paragraph 2, Article 5, Article 6, paragraph 1, subparagraph f, Article 17(1)(a), (c) and (d), Article 17(3)(a), Article 21(1) Judgments

contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR), nor could be based on legitimate interest of the controller (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR). Consent (Article 6(1)(a) GDPR) could

LPACAP), for the alleged infringement of Article 58.1 of the GDPR, typified in the Article 83.5 of the GDPR Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Regulation

factor of article 80.1.a) of the LGT, by motivating him in a generic way. 3. Disagreement with the application of the aggravating factor of article 80.1.c)

breach of Article 5(1)(a), Article 5(1)(d), Article 5(2), Article 6 GDPR and 129 of the Code. The data controller also breached Article 12(2), Article 15 GDPR

of 25,000 euros (Article 83, paragraph 2 GDPR; Article 100, §1, 13 ° WOG and Article 101 WOG). 18 55. Taking into account article 83 GDPR and the case law

violation of Article 5.1.c) of the GDPR, Article 6 of the GDPR, Article 9 of the GDPR, Article 12 of the GDPR, Article 35 of the RGPD, Article 13 of the RGPD

information. b.) On the right to a copy (Article 15, Paragraph 3, GDPR)b.) On the right to a copy (Article 15, Paragraph 3, GDPR) The right to a copy of data in

according to Article 4 No. 2 GDPR, also includes their unlawful collection. However, according to Article 17 Paragraph 3 Letter e of the GDPR, there is an

available”.   19.  The Data Protection Principles are set out in the GDPR.   Article 5(1) GDPR provides that personal data shall be “processed lawfully, fairly

shall comply with Article 6 (1) of the GDPR and Article 13 (1) of the GDPR- (2) of the GDPR and Article 58 (2) point b) of the GDPR decided in accordance

violating Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR, Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR, Article 14 GDPR, Article 24(1) GDPR, and Article

controller for the purposes of Article 4(7) GDPR, and Company A was the processor for the purposes of Article 4(8) GDPR. The DPA found that both Companies

data (Article 32 GDPR); the DPO of the hospital was not directly reporting to the highest management level of within the organization (Article 38(3) GDPR)

comprehensible character, within the meaning of Article 12 of the GDPR, of the information provided for in Article 13 of the Regulation must be assessed. The

Articles 32 to 36 GDPR, including those regarding the notification of personal data breaches. In particular, pursuant to Article 33(2) GDPR in the event

purpose constituted a breach of Article 5(1)(e) GDPR. Secondly, the CNIL indicated that the controller breached Article 13 GDPR by failing to include the right

been 7 Marriott’s Second Representations, para 3.32-3.36. 7 Marriott’s Second Representations, paras 3.35-3.36. 7 Marriott’s Second Representations, para 3

6(1)(b), 5(1)(b) and 5(1)(c) GDPR? The Spanish DPA (AEPD) deemed itself competent under Article 58(2) GDPR in conjunction with Article 47 of the Spanish Data

Decision on the substance 39/2020- 8/23 ... 3. Justification 3.1. The controller (Article 4, point 7) AVG) 36. The Conciliation Chamber finds, first of all

three years, which was in violation of Article 12(3) GDPR. The DPA also determined a violation of Article 17(1)(a) GDPR, because data subject's e-mail accounts

the DPA, the controller breached Article 157 (request for information and production of documents) in relation to Article 166(2) of the Code. Therefore,

are subject to the GDPR pursuant to Article 3(2)(a) of this Regulation. B. On the competence of the CNIL 22. Article 55(1) of the GDPR provides that "each

processing of their personal data pursuant to Article 12 (1) of the GDPR . Profiling 4.35. In Article 4 part 4 GDPR , profiling is defined as any form of automated

not be based on Article 45. Article 46.1 provides, among other things, that in the absence of a decision in accordance with Article 45.3 a personal data

for more details. Article 2: Material scope Article 2.2.c: Exclusively personal or domestic activity Article 3: Territorial scope Article 4.1: Personal data

25 Section 3 (1) sentences 2 and 3 in conjunction with Section 3a of the 14th BayIfSMV violate the requirement of certainty (Article 20 (3) GG). No statements

under national security as defined by Recital 16 GDPR, therefore, making Article 2(2)(a) GDPR applicable? 3) If question 2 is answered in the negative, does

controller (“verlängerter Arm”) (cmp. Article 29 GDPR). If the processing of data is in accordance with Article 6 GDPR, the controller is free to deploy a

all" button be considered a breach of GDPR Article 4(11) and Article 7, read in conjunction with GDPR Article 5(3) -Privacy while the data controller gives

consulted before processing, pursuant to Article 36 GDPR. Fourth, the Court noted that, pursuant to Article 10 GDPR and Article 31 Implementation Act, the IP addresses

by Article 31 of the GDPR; (cooperation with the supervisory authority) • the obligations imposed by Article 37(5) and (7) of the GDPR and Article 38,

that Article 15(1) and 15(3) GDPR do not contain two independent rights but a single right. Therefore, according to the court, Article 15(3) GDPR only

paying profiles. II.4. Article 12(1),(2) and (3), Article 17, Article 19, Article 24(1) and Article 25(1) AVG 63. Article 12 (1) GDPR stipulates that the

No. Article 12, paragraph one,, paragraph 2, paragraph 3 and paragraph 4,, Article 15, paragraph one,, Article 23, paragraph one, litera e,, Article 51

February 2018, 3 Bf 107/17, judgment of 8 February 2018, 3 Bf 107/17, judgment of 8 February 2018, 3 Bf 107/17, judgment of 8 February 2018, 3 Bf 107/17).

of c. Article 9 (2) (h) and (i) and Article 9 (3) on the basis of the public interest in the field of public health; d. in accordance with Article 89 (1)

consent of the 10 complainant (article 6.1 a) of the GDPR combined with article 7 of the GDPR), (2) article 6.1 c) of the GDPR in that the publication results

the GDPR, as the data falls under Article 9 GDPR and awarded € 800 in emotional damages. The Austrian Business Code cannot override Article 9 GDPR. There

an immaterial damage pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR. When assessing the amount of damages pursuant to Article 82(2) GDPR, the court considered as mitigating

violation of Article 22 GDPR. A healthcare provider (controller) requested a prior consultation from the DPA in line with Article 36 GDPR regarding its

the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or on Article 9, (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a), the existence of the

the data subject’s consent under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR but on compliance with legal obligations under Article 6(1)(c) GDPR and that the data subject did not

object to the processing of his personal data under Article 6(1)(e) GDPR and Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The court stated that if a data subject objects to data

Decision Source: standards: Article 17(1) TEU 2016/679, Article 17(1)(a) TEU 2016/679, Article 17(1)(d) TEU 2016/679, Article 16 S 1 TEU 2016/679, § 4(1)

among other things, on Article 15 GDPR. The court of first instance decided to reject the claim and argued that Article 15 GDPR only provides data subjects

- Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 3/13 2.- Contract dated 07/03/2019 Vodafone Fibra 100Mb (portability from Telefónica *** PHONE. 3) 3.- Contract dated 08/21/2019

PECR as set out in Article 4(11) the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (the “GDPR”) read with recital 32, 42 and 43 of the GDPR; and •“Individual”

with the withdrawal of consent (potential violation of Article 7.3 GDPR): ▪ Article 7.3 of the GDPR provides that the data subject has the right to give

disregarded the provisions of Article 5-1 e) of the GDPR. C. On the breach of the obligation to inform people 65. Article 13 of the GDPR requires the data controller

breached Article 6(1)(e) GDPR and ordered all 53 municipalities to bring their processing in line with Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 6(1) GDPR, by ensuring

Administrative Court's application of Article 16 GDPR. The Administrative Court had correctly assumed that, while Article 16 GDPR was applicable, it could not be

infringement of Article 5.1 b) in conjunction with Article 6.4. AVG, on article 5.1 a) in conjunction with article 6.1. AVG and on article 5.1 c) GDPR has been

his claim on Article 78(1) of the GDPR in conjunction with Article 57 of the GDPR. Article 57 of the GDPR. The scope of Article 57 of the GDPR is indeed open

24 sec. 1, art. 25 sec. 1, art. 28 sec. 1 and 3 and article. 32 sec. 1 and 2, as well as art. 83 sec. 1 - 3, art. 83 sec. 4 lit. a) and art. 83 sec. 5 lit

to Art. 85 Para. 2 GDPR, they provide for exceptions to Chapter II, which also includes Art. 6 GDPR. According to Art. 85 Para. 3 GDPR, each Member State

processing according to Article 4(2) GDPR In its decision, the court considered only the list of examples laid down in Article 4(2) GDPR, although the list

person responsible in accordance with Art. 15 Para. 3 Clause 2 GDPR. According to Art. 15Para. 3 Clause 3 GDPR, the personal data could also be provided by the

Sentence 1 GG Art. 3 Para. 1 GG Art. 13 Para. 7 GDPR Art. 4 GDPR Art. 5 Para. 1 GDPR Art. 6 Para. 1, Para. 3, Para. 4 DSGVO Art. 21 Para. 1 GDPR Art. 32 GO Art

violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR and a fine of €100,000 for the violation of Article 37 GDPR. The DPA issued a reprimand for the violations of Article 5(1)(e)

particular Art. 5(1)(b) and (c) GDPR and Art. 6(4) GDPR. For each of the legal bases listed in Art. 6 (1) of the GDPR (except consent according to lit

erasure pursuant to Article 17(1) GDPR were not fulfilled. First, the processing was not unlawful pursuant to Article 17(1)(d) GDPR. As the processing was

resume. 3 The Marktenhof states in point 4.7. of the judgment article 6, d) and article 6, e) of the GBA law, but this should be read as article 6.1. d)

free initial copy of the medical history under Article 15(3) GDPR in conjunction with Article 12(3) GDPR. The Court of Appeal amended the judgment to dismiss

sessions, within the Article 12(3) GDPR time limit. Moreover, the DPA declared that the therapist had breached Article 12(4) GDPR, as they did not inform

and 35 GDPR. As a result, the DPA imposed an administrative fine of €12,000 on the CNSP and €3,000 on ITSS as joint-controller, under Article 83 GDPR. The

Officer (DPO) under Section 4 of Chapter 4 of the GDPR (see in particular Article 37 GDPR to Article 39 GDPR). One of these audit proceedings concerned a Luxembourg

A) The Controller has not respected Article 32, paragraph (1), point (a) and(b) and paragraph (2) of that article of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the protection

infringement committed to Article 12.3 and 12.4 GDPR as well as to Articles 11 §3, 11/1 § 3, 11/2§3 and 11/3 §3 of the law of 3 August 2012 . 2.3.2. With regard to

under Article 5(1)(e) GDPR by not taking any measures to ensure that the recordings were deleted after set limitation of 3 days, 3) Article 12(1) GDPR by

the balancing test in Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. It also held that the new decision should consider the application of Article 10 GDPR. The data controller published

employee (on the basis of Articles 35, 36 and 37 of ZDR-1 in connection with point d or f of Article 6 (1) of the GDPR)? On the basis of the information you

violation of Article 35 of the GDPR, Article 32 of the GDPR and Article 13 of the GDPR, typified in Articles 83.5 of the RGPD and Article 83.4 of the RGPD

data as part of the credit check is based on Article 6 Paragraph 1b GDPR and Article 6 Paragraph 1f GDPR. We basically have a legitimate interest in carrying

agreement between the third party and A. S.à.r.l. in implementation Article 28 GDPR allowed A. S.à.r.l. to disclose personal data processed on behalf of

(implementing provisions of the “e-Privacy Directive”) and 3 Article 6.1.a. of the GDPR. In accordance with article 61 of the LCA, the Litigation Chamber informs the

excerpt, on the website of the Guarantor pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code "(Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation no. 1/2019)

made to the GDPR, it follows that the "consent" provided for in Article 5, paragraph 3, of the "ePrivacy" directive as transposed in article 82 of the "Informatique

derogant rule, based on the interpretation of Article 95 GDPR in the line of the Rec (173) GDPR and Article 1(2) and 15a of the ePrivacy Directive. The CNIL

2016/679 Article 25 (1), Article 32 (1) and (2), Article 33 (1) and (5), Article 34 (1), Article 35 (1) and (7), Article 35 (3) (b), Article 58 (2), Article

should have passed as per Article 12(3) GDPR. The plaintiffs have a right to filed a complaint before a court as per Article 35 GDPR. On that matter, the court

information about his state of health are defined in Article 4 (15) GDPR as data concerning health. Article 48 of the Employment Relationships Act (ZDR-1),

the basis of article 92, 3° of the WOG. 14. The inspection report shall identify potential breaches of Article 5(1). 2 of the AVG, Article 6 of the AVG

violation of article 21 of the LSSICE, classified as serious in article 38.3.d) and c) of said rule, for the alleged infringement of article 48.1.b) of the

Point 6 of Article 3 Act no. 90/2018 and item 7 of Article 4. of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, cf. and the first and second paragraphs. Article 4 Epidemiology

plain. The word "concise" in Article 12(1) GDPR, however, does not mean incomplete, all mandatory information from Article 13 GDPR must still be included. The

Articles 24 and 25 GDPR. The Bulgarian Data Protection Authority (CPDP) found a breach of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 5(1)(f) GDPR since the personal

third party, breach Article 6(1) GDPR? The Spanish DPA (AEPD) referred to the principle of lawfulness, fairness and transparency (Article 5(1)(a)), as well

from the scope of Article 16 GDPR, in my opinion, already follows from the word "inaccurate" in the first sentence of Article 16 GDPR and does not need

grounds for processing under Article 6(1) GDPR. Finally, the NAIH held that the controller was in breach of Article 12(2) GDPR for mis-registering the data

part of its own motion Article 5 (1) (d), Article 6 (1), Article 12 (2), (3) and (4) of that Regulation, and a violation of Article 17 (1) (d) in respect

writing (cf. paragraphs 3 and 4 of article 28 of the GDPR), verification of the requirements set out in article 28 of the GDPR it must be substantive and

were in violation of Article 5(1)(e) GDPR and Article 32 GDPR, but the DPA dismissed its previous finding of the Article 5(1)(b) GDPR violation. The DPA

access under Article 15 GDPR and for violating the principles of data minimisation (Article 5(1)(c) GDPR), confidentiality (Article 5(1)(f) GDPR) and the controller’s

drives and that this obligation was not contrary to Article 6(1) GDPR. Pursuant to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, a controller may use the legal basis of legitimate

administrative complaint to the title court based on the article Paragraph 3, paragraph 1, point 3 of the Administrative Disputes Act for the purpose of assessing

in the GDPR and the DPA. They are obliged by Article 5(2) to adhere to the data processing principles set out in Article 5(1) of the GDPR. Article 5(2) makes

legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR and in violation of transparency obligations in the privacy policy under Article 5(1)(a) and 13 GDPR. The DPA in the

finding likely violations of Article 5(1)(c), 8, 9, 13 and 35 GDPR. The AEPD found a likely violation of Article 35 GDPR. Article 35 GPDR requires that a data

prescription....36 8.1. Violation of article 35 of the GDPR................................................ ...................36 8.2. Violation of article 9 of the

processing plea 6: the right to object - Article 21(1) AVG plea 7: Article 12(3) TFEU - no infringement plea 8: Article 20 AVG-Right of transfer-the warning-not

defining factor for the balancing act under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Second, the court decided that Article 17(1)(c) GDPR obliged a controller to delete personal

deletion. […].” 3.3.3. The Danish Data Protection Authority's assessment 3.3.3.1. Storage of personal data According to the regulation's article 7, subsection

60 of the GDPR does not apply " established by the GDPR and, therefore, in accordance with the provisions of articles 55 par. 1, 2 par. 1 and 3 par. 2 GDPR

processing of personal data on the basis of Article 6(1)(e) GDPR, and the requirement of Article 6(3)(b) GDPR was satisfied, too. Also, the VGH held it to

(1) and Article 25 (1) of the GDPR; c. infringement of Article 30(1),(3) and (4) of the GDPR; and d. violation of Article 38(1) and (3) and Article 39 of

the principles of purpose limitation under Article 5(1)(b) GDPR and data minimisation under Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, the controller must change the angles of

redress. Therefore, the DPA declared an infringement of Article 12(3) GDPR and Article 12(4) GDPR. Additionally, the DPA held that the controller, whether

Paragraph 4 GDPR Art4 Z1 GDPR Art5 Paragraph 1 litc GDPR Art51 Paragraph 1 GDPR Art57 Paragraph 1 litf GDPR Art6 Paragraph 1 litf GDPR Art77 GDPR Art9 B-VG

under Article 34 GDPR or the data protection supervisory authority under Article 33 GDPR because the requirements of the legal definition in Article 4(12)

The Regional Court of Berlin held that a right to information under Article 15 GDPR cannot be enforced by way of an interim injunction, since there is no

1, 4 and 5 as they would constitute a breach of Article 10(1)(d) Wob and consequently of Article 9 GDPR. The personal data in the Documents concerned data

order to comply with the provisions of Article 13 of the GDPR. The controlled specified that in accordance with Article L-261-1 of the Labor Code, collective

overwritten or deleted form the system. This request was in compliance with Article 28(3) GDPR since the data controller validated the data subject's request by

infringement of Article 38.3 of the GDPR, but no infringement on Article 38. 1, 38.2 and 38.6 of the GDPR and no infringement of Article 39 of the GDPR. 5. On February

the DPA to decide whether or not there has been a breach of the GDPR under Article 32 GDPR. Secondly, the APD held that regarding each document, the data

data under Article 4(1) GDPR. Moreover the court found that the controller can refuse to act on the request according to Article 12(5)(b) GDPR, because the

data within the meaning of Article 4(1) GDPR? Does a disclosure of personal data under the FOIA fall under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR? The ICO first held, that

has in relation to the general public, the same effect as an erasure (Article 17 GDPR). It would be excessive and contrary to the mission of the media to

use of your data 21 GDPR, he did not explain to what extent the Data processing based on Article 6 Paragraph 1 Letter f of the GDPR is nevertheless not

DSGVO/BDSG , Article 15 paragraph 33; Schaffland/Holthaus in Schaffland/Wiltfang, GDPR, Article 15 GDPR paragraph 44; loc. A. Härting, CR 2019, 219). 136 (3) In

channels. It then attempted to rely on the soft opt-in exemption under Article 22(3) PECR. The exemption enables organisations to send marketing texts to

of the GDPR. 17. By Article 57(1) of the GDPR, it is the Commissioner's task to monitor and enforce the application of the GDPR. 18. By Article 58(2)(d)

section 3.3 >>.<< 3.3. Informed manifestation of willThe GDPR reinforces the requirement that consent must be informed. In accordance with theArticle 5 of

under Article 24(4) sentence 5 GO with regard to the use of the radio function, the protection of the home under Article 13(1) GG and Article 106(3) BV is

as established in article 5 of the GDPR. The security of personal data is regulated in articles 32, 33 and 34 of the GDPR. III The GDPR defines personal

of the GDPR has violated: iv. Article 4.11), Article 5.1.a) and 5.2, Article 6.1.a), as well as Article 7.1 and 7.3 GDPR; v. Article 5, Article 24.1, as

the GDPR and DPA 2018. They are obliged by Article 5(2) of the GDPR to adhere to the data processing principle set out in Article 5(1). 8. Article 5(1)(f)

not violate Article 16 GDPR. However, by not following up on the request of the data subject, the controller violated Article 12(3) and (4) GDPR. The DPA

on the basis of of Article 91, §2 WOG, as a result of which the Dispute Resolution Chamber was constituted pursuant to Article 92, 3° WOG; B. Procedure

offer services to data subjects in the EU (Article 3(2)(a) GDPR). The DPA concluded that Article 3(2)(b) GDPR was also not applicable. The DPA mentioned

the sense of Article 4(2) GDPR and confirmed that Alava Water Consortium would therefore have to observe the principles of Article 5 GDPR and have a valid

Articles 12.3 and 12.4 of the GDPR, as well as Article 15.1 of the GDPR, which in this case justifies taking a decision on the basis of article 95, § 1, 5°

by a company incorporated by French law, thus breaching Article 80(1) GDPR. Article 80(1) GDPR states that the data subject has the right to mandate (i)

sense of Article 4(1) GDPR. Moreover, OLG Celle also held that a singular access request can never be excessive for the purposes of Article 12(5) GDPR as the

issued a warning to a hospital group for non-compliance of Article 32 GDPR and Article 24 GDPR, as the hospital group had failed to implement the appropriate

infractions of article 48 of Law 9/2014, of May 9, General of Telecommunications (hereinafter LGT), in accordance with the provisions of the article 84.3 of the

right to access under Article 15 GDPR. Second, the Court considered whether the claimant could have invoked their Article 15 GDPR rights if the data in

legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR, and special category personal data without a valid exemption from the prohibition in Article 9(1) GDPR. Grindr has until

because, under the GDPR, Facebook Norway could not be considered a data controller under Article 4(7) GDPR and Articles 66(1) and 61(8) GDPR were used incorrectly

crawlers to identify GDPR violations with the sole aim of claiming non-material damages rules out compensation under Article 82 GDPR. The controller embedded

to the Article 60 cooperation mechanism, the Swedish DPA held that a controller violated Article 12(3) GDPR by not responding to an Article 15 GDPR access

that their right to erasure (Article 17(1) GDPR) and their right to access (Article 15(1)(b) GDPR and Article 15(1)(d) GDPR) had been violated. In February

personal data and information under Article 15 GDPR in his Google account, Google has not violated Article 15 GDPR concerning this data/information. As

to the GDPR in execution of article 2.1. of the GDPR. II.2. Regarding compliance with Article 6 of the GDPR (lawfulness) 24. Pursuant to Article 6 of the

legal basis under Article 9(2) GDPR for sending the medical assessment, which contained health data under Article 14 GDPR#15Article 4(15) GDPR, to the municipality

the meaning of Article 4(12) GDPR. It also recalled that any person who suffered material or non-material damages due to a breach of the GDPR has a right

processed. This was particularly relevant since courts (Article 55 (3) GDPR) and a parliamentary body (§ 2 (3) Datenschutzgesetz Rheinland-Pfalz - DSG RP) were

the requirements of Article 17 GDPR fulfilled and would the defendant require to delete the school record? Article 17 (1) (a) GDPR grants a right to delete

organizational measures pursuant to Article 32 GDPR. The court held that the controller violated Article 32(1) GDPR, which requires appropriate technical

Protection, in accordance with the provisions of article 37. g) in relation to article 36 of the LOPD. II Article 3.j) of the LOPD specifies “sources accessible

personal data in that assessment pursuant to Article 15(1) GDPR. However, Article 23(1)(i) GDPR and Article 41 UAVG provide the possibility of a restriction

required for data processing in accordance with Article 6(1)(e) GDPR in accordance with Article 6(3)(1)(b) GDPR (OLG Schleswig, judgment of July 2nd, 2021 -

meaning of Article 4(1) GDPR. Nevertheless, in this case the controller had the right to disregard the request in light of Article 12(5)(b) GDPR, as the latter

applied Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, according to which the data subject could have voluntarily disclosed their health data defined in Article 4(15) GDPR to the

Litigation Chamber pursuant to Article 62, § 1 of the LCA. 3. Pursuant to article 95 § 2, 3° of the LCA as well as article 47 of the rules of order inside

The Directorate failed to provide the documents (required following Article 28(3) GDPR) to demonstrate that the purposes and means of processing were determined

pecuniary damages under Article 1, in conjunction with Article 2(1) Grundgesetz or for non-pecuniary damages under Article 82 GDPR because of the loss of

data are part of a filing system, in line with Article 2(1) GDPR. Article 4(6) GDPR defines a filing system as "any structured set of personal data, which

violated Article 14 and Article 15 GDPR, since the controller did not give exact information where they had obtained the email-address from (Article 14(2)(f)

in violation of Article 6 GDPR. Thirdly, it was claimed that Meta unlawfully processed special categories of personal data (Article 9 GDPR). Fourth, and

of section 3 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 ("UK GDPR"). 2. This notice explains the Commissioner's reasons for that opinion. 3. A Preliminary

user contract, the plaintiff has the defendant as evidenced by number 3.3.1. and 3.3.2. of the terms of use, a corresponding, non-exclusive worldwide right

DPA under Article 78 of the GDPR. The court dismissed the complaint. It found that the plaintiff is precluded from having recourse to the GDPR in connection

the basis of Article 62, § 1 WOG transferred to the Disputes Chamber. 15. In accordance with Article 95, § 2, 3° of the WOG as well as Article 47 of the internal

basis of GDPR Article 58 (2) point b), because it violated Article 15 (1) of the GDPR. (40) In accordance with Article 58 (2) point d) of the GDPR, the Authority

1 and p. 2 ZPO. V. 36. The determination of the amount in dispute follows from § 53, Subsection 1, No. 1, GKG in conjunction with § 3 ZPO. The value of

Brandenburg), corresponding to § 3 BDSG (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz – Federal Data Protection Act) and implementing Art 6 (1) e) GDPR, as a basis for access to personal

referred to Article 5(1)(a) (principle of lawfulness, fairness and transparency), Article 12(1), Article 7, Article 13 and Article 14 GDPR, the corresponding

comply with the GDPR. In this regard, the AEPD also noted the accountability and proactive responsibility from Article 5(2) that the GDPR entails. And such

information obligation set out in Article 13 GDPR and in breach of the principle of data minimisation set out in Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. The CNPD carried out an audit

17 (1) (c) GDPR also opens up to provisions of national law via the implicit reference to Art. 6 GDPR; According to Art. 6 Para. 2, 3 GDPR, the national

first paragraph of Article 91 of ZVOP 1 and when applying the second paragraph of Article 26 of ZP 1, the first paragraph of Article 21 of ZP 1 and the

events during the Covid-19 pandemic violates Articles 5, 6(3)(b), 9, 13, 14, 25 and 32 GDPR. On the 22nd of April 2021, the Decree Law (decreto legge)

personal data under Article 15 GDPR. It found the claim to be inadmissible because it used terms which are not included in Article 15(1) GDPR, and which are

Officer (DPO) under Section 4 of Chapter 4 of the GDPR (see in particular Article 37 GDPR to Article 39 GDPR). One of these audit proceedings concerned a Luxembourg

Comment², Article 5, margin no. 8f). 3.3.2. The principle according to Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. b GDPR Article 5, paragraph one, litera b, GDPR standardizes