Search results

Original Language(s): English Original Source: ICO (in EN) Initial Contributor: At33

of “aware” likely reflects its meaning under Article 33(1) GDPR (see above). According to Article 33(2) GDPR, the processor has the obligation to notify

Original Language(s): English Original Source: ICO (in EN) Initial Contributor: At33

Original Language(s): English Original Source: ICO (in EN) Initial Contributor: At33

Original Language(s): English Original Source: ICO (in EN) Initial Contributor: At33

Original Language(s): English Original Source: ICO (in EN) Initial Contributor: At33

supervisory authority under Article 33 GDPR. Hence, not all breaches must be communicated. On this point,see Article 33 GDPR. Bensoussan, Reglement europeen

by a data breach which triggers the notification obligations under Article 33 GDPR and Article 34 GDPR. This provision is closely connected to Article 34(4)

budget for 2022 amounts to €2,523,000 Year 2020 Complaints: [] Fines: With 33 decisions fines of 90,500 euros were imposed Decisions: [] Opinions: [] Breach

Fontenoy, TSA 80715, 75334 PARIS CEDEX 07 Webpage: cnil.fr Fax: +33 1 53 73 22 00 Phone: +33 1 53 73 22 22 Twitter: @CNIL and @CNIL_en Procedural Law: n/a

under Article 30(1) GDPR, documenting personal data breaches under Article 33(5) GDPR or performing a data protection impact assessment under Article 35

the other refers to the controller’s." When a data breach occurs (Articles 33-34 GDPR), the processor shall notify the controller without undue delay. The

unnecessarily disruptive to the use of the service for which it is provided. Recital 33: Consent for Scientific Research It is often not possible to fully identify

of secrecy are laid down in the EDPB's Rules of Procedure (“RoP”). Article 33(1) RoP stipulates that in “accordance with Art 76 (1) GDPR”, discussions of

Valby DENMARK Webpage: datatilsynet.dk Email: dt@datatilsynet.dk Phone: +45 33 1932 00 Twitter: n/a Procedural Law: n/a Decision Database: Link Translated

action on the part of the controller or processor, for instance, Articles 33 and 36 GDRP. To illustrate, Article 36 GDPR obliges the controller to consult

(Article 32), responsibilities of the DPO in case of data breaches (Articles 33 and 34), and preparation of data protection impact assessments and prior consultation

Article 84, margin number 1 (C.H. Beck 2018, 2nd edition). CJEU, Rewe, Case C-33/76, 16 December 1967 (available here) cited by Lynskey in Kuner et al., The

Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 30 GDPR, margin number 33 (C.H. Beck 2019). Scholars note that the requirement to specify the responsible

DVI has 33 employees as per 1st October 2022 out of totally approved 34 positions. About 76 % are women, 24% are men.   Historical numbers: 2021: 33 positions

personal data breaches and determining the undue delay referred to in Article 33(1) and (2) and for the particular circumstances in which a controller or a

Transparency under Regulation 2016/679’, 17/EN WP260 rev.01, 11 April 2018, p. 33 (available here).

Articles 12-23 GDPR; the obligation to notify data breaches pursuant to Article 33 GDPR; the obligation of data protection by design and by default, pursuant

number 47 (available here). CJEU, Case C-212/13, Ryneš, margin numbers 31 and 33 (available here). Especially, CJEU, C-101/01, Lindqvist, 6 November 2003,

personal data breaches to the supervisory authority and data subjects (Articles 33 and 34), conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments (Articles 35 and 36)

on data subject rights - Right of access’, 28 March 2023 (Version 2.0), p. 33 (available here). For example, the District Court of Amsterdam has held that

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

(available here). Paal, in Paal, Pauly, DS-GVO BDSG Article 23, margin number 33 (C.H.Beck 2021, 3rd Edition) and Bäcker, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG

especially where there is a reason for urgency. It must be noted here that Articles 33(3)(b) and 34(2) GDPR on post-data breach communications both require the controller

rules regarding the processing of personal data of deceased persons. Recital 33: Consent for Scientific Research It is often not possible to fully identify

Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 12 GDPR, margin number 33 (C.H. Beck 2018, 2nd Edition). XXX FOOTNOTE XXX See Bäcker, in Kühling, Buchner

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

'personal data breach' is relevant for the notification duties under Articles 33 and 34 GDPR. The definition of a data breach requires a security breach, such

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

Database: n/a Translated Decisions: Category:BayLDA (Bavaria) Head Count: 33 (2021) Budget: 1.893.200 (2021)

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

Ziebarth, in Sydow, Marsch, DS-GVO/BDSG, Article 57 GDPR, margin numbers 32-33 (Nomos 2022). Boehm, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 57 GDPR, margin

and the rights of data subjects (right of access, right of erasure, etc.). 33 opinions on draft laws or regulations (compared to 24 in 2020) — In addition

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

and letter f., Article 5, paragraph Article 6 (1) (a) Article 32 (1), (1), (33) 1 and 35, para. 1. Below is a more detailed review of the case and a justification

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. 33 O 376/22 District Court of Cologne IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE Judgment In the

width="15%"><select class="newMainText" id=_piref33_15473_33_15453_15453.etos name=_piref33_15473_33_15453_15453.etos style="width:140px;" ><option value="-1"

restrictions to this right that Articles 23 GDPR and 33 Law 4624/2019 provide. More specifically, Article 33 mentions that the right to access cannot be fulfilled

relieve the doctor of his obligation to notify a breach, as required by Article 33 GDPR? During the hearing before the CNIL, the doctor explained his position

measures in place to guarantee security of processing. Violation of Article 33(1) for failing to notify the Garante of the violation of personal data Violation

authority in accordance with Article 33(1) of Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information set out in Article 33(3) of that Regulation, and to notify

dnung, Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (DS-GVO/BDSG3), C.H. Beck, 2021, Art 15 RZ 33f, the term copy in para. 3 refers to the information to be provided pursuant

the Federal Constitutional Court has clarified that the provision of Art. 33 Para elected constituency (BVerfG, decision of September 20, 2016 - 2 BvR

particular the complainant's statement of 22 January 2019, page 2 (OZ 1 p 33). They also rely on the statement of the complainant of 22 January 2019, page

HDPA - 33/2023 Authority: HDPA (Greece) Jurisdiction: Greece Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(a) GDPR Article 5(1)(c) GDPR Article 6(1)(c) GDPR Article 17(1)

deleted when the purposes have been fulfilled (C‑553/07, EU:C:2009:293, point 33). It also held that each processing operation should be compliant with Articles

violation of Article 33 GDPR. The DPA imposed a fine of EUR 3,0000 for breach of Article 32 GDPR and a warning for breach of Article 33 GDPR. Also, the DPA

of Article 33(1) and 33(5) GDPR found by the LSA: In relation to the objection of the FR SA on the absence of an infringement of Article 33(1) GDPR, the

subject, and for failing to notify this data breach, in violation of Articles 5, 33 and 34 GDPR. A data subject filed a complaint with the Greek DPA (Hellenic

Dutch original for more details. Litigation Chamber Decision on the merits 33/2020 of 19 June 2020 File number : DOS-2019-05200 Subject : Complaint about

being informed of the data breach contrary to the requirements of Article 33 GDPR. Based on a data subject's complaint, the Romanian DPA started investigations

The Spanish DPA (AEPD) held that a rare disease foundation violated Article 33 GDPR by failing to notify a data breach within the prescribed 72 hours. In

in accordance with Art. 33 paragraph. 1 of the Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 paragraph. 3 of the Regulation

found the violation of the provisions of art. 32 para. (1) and (2) and art. 33 para. (1) of the General Data Protection Regulation. The operator DADA CREATION

security breach in its voicemail box function. Had Telenor Norge violated Article 33 GDPR by failing to notify the Datatilsynet of the data breach? Had Telenor

DPA fined a magazine company €31,200 for violating Articles 5(1)(f), 32, and 33 GDPR because of a personal data security breach caused by vulnerabilities

breach to the supervisory authority, in accordance with Article 33 GDPR. Under Article 33, the controller should have reported the breach within 72 hours

been notified with regards to the security incident, in breach of Article 33 GDPR, for which the controller was fined RON 4,918.3 (approximately €1,000)

limit mandated by Article 33(1). Did the secretariat of the DPA breach its data security obligations under Articles 32(1), 33(1), and 34(1)? The Datatilsynet

rambling, abstract explanations in the reasoning for the appeal (pages 12 to 33) were noted and examined, but were not considered to be definitive. They justify

(controller) notified the Romanian DPA of two data breaches in line with Article 33 GDPR. Following the notifications, the DPA launched an investigation which

The Datatilsynet issued a decision on Articles 32 and 33 GDPR due to unencrypted e-mails sent by the controller. After carrying out investigations at its

didn't consider the incident to have triggered this requirement as per Article 33 GDPR. * Innovation Norway is state-owned and the Norwegian government's instrument

The AEPD approved a transport hub's compliance with Articles 32 and 33 GDPR after having used its investigation powers. After a security guard of Madrid’s

Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Article 34 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No further action Started:

violation of Articles 32, 33 and 34, violations all of which are typified in article 83.4.a). V The violation of articles 32, 33 and 34 of the RGPD are criminalized

Belgian DPA assessed whether the controller had violated Articles 5, 24, 28, 33 and 34 GDPR, however they found that none of these provisions were breached

the under General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679. According to Article 33 of GDPR, in the case of a personal data breach, the Data Controller shall

loss itself, that the information and measures mentioned in Article 33(1)(b) to Article 33(1)(d) GDPR must also be communicated to the data subject. However

referred to in Article 33(1) of the AVG.15 15 File note 1, Notification of personal data breach 7-2-2019. P 5. 3.4.3 Assessment Article 33(1) of the AVG provides

data breach was an isolated incident and the controller complied with Article 33 GDPR. An investigation was started on 20 December 2019 over the practices

à l’obligation de notifier la violation de données à la CNIL 33. Aux termes de l’article 33, paragraphe 1, du RGPD, en cas de violation de données à caractère

and the minimization of data, as well as the national legislation (d.lgs. 33/2013), which obliges the community to publish the compound emoluments received

Protection Agency is of the opinion that Zoo's description, cf. Article 33, subsection Article 33 (3) (d) of the measures taken to deal with the breach was not correct

notified the DPA too late about the data breach in violation of the Article 33 GDPR. The DPA also ordered the controller to communicate the data breach to

September 2021, the Danish DPA found violations of Articles 5(2), 5(1)(a), 32(1), (33)(1) and (35)(1) GDPR. It ordered the Municipality to bring its processing

obliged to notify the data breach to the AP within 72 hours pursuant to Article 33(1) GDPR. The AP recalled that the main purpose of this obligation is to encourage

in accordance with Art. 33 paragraph. 1 of the Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 paragraph. 3 of Regulation

authority, in accordance with art. 33 sec. 1 Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 sec. 3 of this source of law, but

Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 4(12) GDPR Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No Violation Found Started: Decided: Published:

NOK 100,000. The notified fee of NOK 150,000 was thus reduced by approx. 33.33% with reference to the company's financial situation. The Authority considers

Article 67 of the Bulgarian Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), supra Article 33 of the GDPR, and violation of the requirement for communicating the personal

obligation to document a personal data breach (Article 33 GPDR) The DPA also determined a violation of Article 33 GDPR. The documentation provided by the controller

and officially notified the HDPA of the breach in accordance with Article 33 GDPR. Corrective measures to fix the issue were also implemented. Despite

obligation under the articles5 (1) (f), 5 (2), 15, 32 and 33 of the Regulation, as well as article 33 (1) (y) of Law 125 (1) / 2018and she was asked to submit

(hereinafter 'the Code'); HAVING REGARD to Article 5, of Legislative Decree no. 33 of 14 March 2013 on "Reorganization of the rules concerning the right of civic

level of security, as required by article 32, read in conjunction with article 33 GDPR. The Garante examined the notification by the university “la Sapienza”

Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No Violation Found Started: Decided: 06

that BroBizz's processing of personal data was in accordance with Article 33 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation. 1 and Article 34 (1). First The following

insufficient took precautions to prevent the data breach b. Articles 33.1 and 33.5 and 34.1 GDPR, given that defendant did not mention it data breach to

Public Health Service of Madrid for violating Articles 5(1)(f), 25(1), 32 and 33 GDPR due to a website failure which resulted in the exposure of personal data

Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(f) GDPR Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No Violation Found Started: Decided: 06

outcome of the survey n ° [...] carried out with the public establishment A 33/33

case. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 33 33/35 Regarding the seriousness of the offense, it already concurs as an aggravating

E/08501/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 33 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: n/a Started: Decided: Published: 21.01.2020

investigation to determine whether the Ministry of Tourism contravened Articles 33, 34 and 37 GDPR. First, the Ministry of Tourism argued that whilst it is the

and therefore lacked a legal basis. The Court also held that Articles 32 and 33 UAVG (Dutch law for the implementation of the GDPR) were the only provisions

properly respond to an access request, in violation of Articles 15(3) and 33 GDPR. The data subject made an access request to the controller, Vodafone

art. 24 sec. 1, art. 25 sec. 1, art. 32 sec. 1 lit. d, art. 32 sec. 2, art. 33 paragraph. 1 and art. 34 sec. 1 of the Regulation of the European Parliament

breach notification to be will-independent information. In view of article 33(5) of the GDPR, OLVG is required to document all personal data breaches, together

For its part, the security of personal data comes regulated in articles 32, 33 and 34 of the RGPD, which regulate the security of the processing, notification

a warning to a local administration for violating Articles 5(1)(f), 32 and 33 GDPR. The administration had mistakenly published an Excel sheet containing

art. 28 sec. 3 lit. h, 32 sec. 1 lit. b and lit. d, art. 32 sec. 2, art. 33 paragraph. 1, art. 34 sec. 1 Regulation of the European Parliament and the

the competent authority when the conditions for the application of Article 33 of the RGPD are gathered together. In this case, no such notification has

processed, or the unauthorized disclosure of or access to such data. Article 33.1 of the RGPD states the following: In the event of a breach of the security

against security risks, so that no infringement of Article 32 and Article 33can be established in this case. The defendant 2claims that there is no processing

breaches of personal data security to the Authority in accordance with Article 33 of the Data Protection Regulation. Journal number: 2020-432-0037 Summary The

entry into force of Legislative Decree 101/2018), in relation to Articles 33 and 154, paragraph 1, lett. c) of the same Code; NOTING that, by examining

no breach of Article 5.2 of the GDPR, Article 24.1 of the GDPR and Article 33 of the GDPR can be established. - As regards the involvement of the Data Protection

security and at least contain the information and measures referred to in Article 33 (2). 3 (b), (c) and (d). The deadline for compliance is January 7, 2020 .

Creditinfo reviews the obligations imposed on lenders according to Act no. 33/2013 on consumer loans, which, among other things, aims to prevent lending

it should be noted that Article 15 of Legislative Decree no. 33 of March 14, 2013, no. 33 regulates the publication obligations concerning the holders

addition, again in the two-year period, the Company: "imposed 33 penalties" in relation to "33 conduct that did not comply with the provisions of the mandate

Spanish administrative law were invoked, leading to a reduced fine of EUR 33.000. On 26/12/2018 AEPD received a complaint against XFERA MOVILES, S.A (YOIGO)

not strictly necessary for the purpose pursued, and therefore excessive. 33. 33. Nevertheless, it notes that the Company has, prior to the initiation of

photos showing the plaintiff and bearing his name, the defendant infringed Sec. 33 of the German Data Protection Act (DSG) as well as Sec. 78 of the Copyright

further surveys. In addition, the discrepancy includes 43 document titles about 33 employees from 2018 - 2019. The breach personal data security has arisen as

adopted on 29 November 2017 by the Group 29, p. 9-10. Page 33 Substance decision 34/2020 - 33/35 107. Fourth, it should be noted that the retention period

legal basis for making the decisions is the Personal Data Act 2018 § 26, cf. § 33, cf. Personal Data Act 2000 § 46. On the basis of the Directorate of Customs'

EU:C:2021:504, paragraph 61, judgment Nowak, C-434/16, EU:C:2017:994, paragraph 33 and judgment Rijkeboer, C-553/07, EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 59. Page 14 of

municipality "for fifteen consecutive days, unless specific provisions of law". 33/2013, which - respectively - provide that "data, information and documents

as required by Article 33 GDPR. For the purposes of this Penalty Notice, the Commissioner does not rely on any breach of Article 33 GDPR and any prior finding

complaint against companies AMPNI and EY Greece for alleged violations of Article 33 GDPR. According to the complainant people related to the defendants entered

"Robinson List" regardless of the contractual obligation. According to Article 33(2) of the Spanish data protection law (LOPDGDD), Raise Marketing is responsible

public authority. This is underpinned by the differentiated regulation in Art. 33 and 34 of the GDPR regarding the notification obligations towards the authority

effects of the PDB and has duly complied with the requirements of Article 33(3) of the GDPR.   DECISION According to Article 83 (4) (a) of the GDPR, the

notified the Romanian DPA of the data security breach pursuant to Article 33 GDPR, prompting an investigation by the DPA. The investigation revealed that

Regulations of 15 December 2000 no. 1265. (2018) § 33. According to the Personal Data Act (2018) § 33, the rules «which applied at the time of action» shall

number. Furthermore, the defendant violated the obligation set out in Art. 33 GDPR to inform the competent supervisory authority in the event of a data

legal prosecution. and dismiss the defendant's appeal. The defendant requests,,33The defendant requests, 34 rejecting the plaintiff's appeal, the judgment of

of 04.05.2016, p. 1, hereinafter referred to as "the Regulation"): DSGVO). 33 § Section 12 sentence 1 BMG old stipulated that if stored data are incorrect

country transfers must be assessed based on its specific legal context (point 33). 7 The security-enhancing measures mainly consist of the responsibility for

1(g) Law 4629/2019 Article 9 Law 4629/2019 Article 15 Law 4629/2019 Article 33 Law 4629/2019 Type: Complaint Outcome: Other Outcome Started: Decided: 30

"Hospital") notified the Authority of two personal data violations, pursuant to art. 33 of the Regulation, dated XX and XX, concerning, respectively: a) entering

describe the categories of personal data concerned, in accordance with Article 33 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation. In a specific case, which was further

call to order against him. 2. Regarding the taking of corrective measures 33. In his additional letter to the statement of objections of 3 August 2020

notified this Authority of the personal data breach referred to in Article 33 of the Regulation, consisting in the loss of a device containing personal

.................33 5.3 Positionofthe LSA onthe objections ........................................................................33 5.4 Analysisofthe

becoming aware of the incident, it shall be immediately investigated and Article 33 (1) of the General Data Protection Regulation has been notified to the Authority

("Terms and Conditions") (Exhibit 33). 32 CJEU judgment of 10 July 2018,C-25/17, Jehovah's Witnesses, ECLI:EU:C:2018:551. 33Terms and Conditions for the IAB

2020. In total, these third parties had copied and stolen 389,000 records of 33,200 affected persons. The attackers were able to access the whole IT system

of appeal in labour and social law cases of 12 August 2019, GZ 11 Ra 45/19w-33, which did not allow the appeals of both parties against the judgment of the

dispensation from the licensing obligation pursuant to the Personal Data Act § 33 third paragraph, as the relevant processing of sensitive personal data lacks

Federal Public Service Finance, with registered office in Koning Albert II-laan 33/014, with company number 0308.357.159, hereinafter “de defendant” Decision

regards the relevance of compliance with Protocol No. 7 to the Treaties on the 33 Privileges and Immunities of the European Union (the ‘Protocol’) , the EDPS

the website Nieuwbouw-Eindhoven.nl used price indication. This amounts to 33 homes in total at € 11,046,775. The homes have been sold individually. This

data breaches from more than twenty Danish banks in accordance with Article 33 GDPR. The reported data breaches concern the accidental disclosure of personal

1 March 2021: "The appeal is rejected, cf. the Public Administration Act § 33 second paragraph." A submitted a timely appeal against the Data Inspectorate's

paragraph33. 313AT SAObjection,p.11;DESAs Objection,p.9;FI SAObjection,paragraph43;NLSAObjection,paragraph33. 314 NLSAObjection,paragraphs32-33. 315NLSAObjection

legislation”. As such, the court also refused to grant summary judgement. [31]-[33] On Misuse of Private Information and Breach of Confidence: The court found

to theprotection of the processing of personal data.23. Pursuant to article 33 § 1 LCA, the Litigation Chamber is the litigation bodyadministrative ODA.

Section 17 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act, Federal Law Gazette I No. 33/ 2013 as amended (VwGVG) in conjunction with Section 38 of the General Administrative

insurer (see Armbrüster in MüKo VVG, 2nd edition 2016, § 3 marginal number 51). 33d) Likewise, a claim does not follow from Section 3 (3) VVG, since the defendant

presumably follows from the transitional rules in the Personal Data Act 2018 § 33, cf. the Privacy Board's decision PVN-2018-14. This also has support in the

security and at least contain the information and measures referred to in Article 33 (2). 3 (b), (c) and (d). The deadline for compliance is January 7, 2020 .

notified Datatilsynet of several personal data breaches pursuant to Article 33 GDPR concerning the use of the Vigilo-app. Through the use of the app, biological

of which has been adopted on April 11, 2018 (hereinafter: “WP 260 rev.01”). 33. Note that the EDPS took up and reapproved the documents adopted by the said

controller notified the Greek DPA of a personal data breach under Article 33 GDPR by the processor related to the transmission of the data. The DPA considered

Poliambulatorio Talenti S.r.l. with registered office in Rome, via Padre Semeria, 33 C.F. 1961330584/ P.IVA 01021921000, (hereinafter the "health facility"), the

notification of data security breach, according to the provisions of art. 33 of the RGPD.

the new law came into force. It follows from the Personal Data Act 2018 § 33 that the rules on the processing of personal data that applied at the time

2017 - 2 A 662/17 - juris, marginal 38; Schild, in: BeckOK Datenschutzrecht, 33 Ed. 1 August 2020, DS-GVO, Art. 4, marginal 34). b) Personal data are also

notwithstanding the findings of the inspection report and the terms of the complaint 33. On several occasions in its submissions, the second defendant points out

inseparably linked with those of the data controller, in this case Google LLC. 33. At this stage, the Litigation Chamber makes a preliminary observation on

this was addressed by management and that awareness was being looked into. 33 After the first four data leaks in 2016, UWV decided to take organizational

that 2 co-owners [indicating their names and financial situation] do not pay 33 their monthly advances”. He believed that the controlled "used the personal

of the RGPD with penalty of warning. 2. Infringement of articles 25, 32 and 33 of the RGPD in relation to the article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, typified in article

interested parties and the consequent active amendment provided for by art. 33 GDPR for data breach situations "which, therefore, would be" attributable

these terms have an ordinary meaning and do not create legal uncertainty (B.30-33). The creation of the passenger database and its administration by the PIU

(2000). There is a special transitional rule in the Personal Data Act (2018) § 33 first paragraph infringement fine, which reads: «The rules on the processing

breach and contain at least the information and measures referred to in Article 33 paragraph 3 points b), c) and d) of Regulation 2016/679 , i.e: (1) the name

structure of 7 faculties, 2 schools, 4 research institutes, 27 departments, 33 services and administrative Units, and 4 management centres, and the data

MB and the BF1 for comments. I.7. With a statement of May 4th, 2021 (VWA ./33, see point II.2), the MB stated that they only use the free version of XXXX

Article 32 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the GDPR, as well as of Article 33 paragraph (1) of the GDPR, which led to imposing an administrative fine in

this decision is taken by the chairman Hielke Hijmans, sitting alone (Article 33, §1, paragraph 3 WOG). 27. On March 4, 2022, the Disputes Chamber rules in

e and i FGO § 32a Paragraph 1 No. 1, Paragraph 2, § 32c Paragraph 1 No. 1§ 33, § 90 a, § 115 Paragraph 2 No. 1 and 2, § 135 Paragraph 1 VwGO § 40 paragraph

the crisis Covid-19 ”from the Ministry of Health, dated May 14, 2020. - "Law 33/2011, of October 4, General of Public Health". - “Law 31/1995, of November

Language(s): French Original Source: GBA (in French) Initial Contributor: kv33

received Report on the violation of personal data, in accordance with Article 33, paragraph 1 of the General Regulation on Data Protection. Also, the data

for the deletion of personal data other than those referred to in Section 33 of the Act. According to Section 34, Subsection 1, Clause 4 of the Act, other

equivalence and effectiveness (compare the judgment of 16 December 1976, C-33/76, Rewe, ECLI:EU:C:1976:188, and the judgment of 13 July 2006, C-295/04 -

of non-compliance from the municipality (the data controller) under Article 33 GDPR. On the 7 December 2023, the Norwegian DPA imposed a reprimand on the

implementation is taking longer than the UWV had hoped. Review Assessment framework 33. In the investigation report, the AP established that the UWV in the employer

the Communication has been largely in line with the requirements of Articles 33 and 34 of the General Data Protection Regulation. However, the notice included

letter a, cf. Article 6, subsection 1, and Article 32, subsection 1, Article 33, subsection 1, and Article 35, subsection 1. Furthermore, the Danish Data

unnecessarily disruptive to the use of the service for which it is provided. Recital 33: It is often not possible to fully identify the purpose of personal data processing

on video devices, paragraph 33. 223EDPB Guidelines 3/2019 on video devices, paragraph 36. 224Case C-13/16 Rīgas, paragraph 33; and WP29 Opinion 06/2014 on

equivalence and effectiveness (compare the judgment of 16 December 1976, C-33/76, Rewe, ECLI:EU:C:1976:188, and the judgment of 13 July 2006, C-295/04 -

was not specifically shown. However, this must actually have been suffered. 33Any alleged material losses that are said to be related to the registration

Original Language(s): Dutch Original Source: AP (in NL) Initial Contributor: kv33

Cooperation with the supervisory authority Article 32: Processing security Article 33: Notification of personal data breach Article 34: Notification of personal

95/46 Paragraph 13 Swedish Law on Personal Data, ‘the PUL (1998:204) Paragraph 33 Swedish Law on Personal Data, ‘the PUL (1998:204) Paragraph 36 Swedish Law

- corr., 10/17, 46/19 - US decision, 47 / 19). In accordance with Article 33 of the ZNPPol, the collection and processing of data is one of the police

Dutch Original Source: APD/GBA (Belgium) (in Dutch) Initial Contributor: Kv33

0308.357.753, North Galaxy Towers, 1030 BRUSSELS, Boulevard du Roi Albert lI33, requesting party, having acted as counsel Maître VAN GYSEGHEM Jean-Marc,

complied with its obligations under Article 33(1) but as well with Article 33(5). In relation to Article 33(1), the DPC view was that, on the basis of the

Transavia about a security breach of personal data as referred to in article 33 of the AVG.In this notification is indicated by Transavia that a malicious

CJEU - C-33/22 Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde Court: CJEU Jurisdiction: European Union Relevant Law: Article 2(2)(a) GDPR Article 4(7) GDPR 16(2) TFEU

Articles 33 and 34 GDPR. The DPA held that although controllers can investigate potential data breaches before the 72-hour time limit in Article 33 GDPR starts

aimed at ensuring "a minimum level of protection of personal data" (see art. 33 of Legislative Decree no. 196 of 30.6.2003, Personal Data Protection Code

duty on the controller to report such a breach is required by law in Article 33 GDPR. When arguing for a smaller fine, the municipality claimed their case

three communications relating to violations of personal data pursuant to art. 33 of the Regulation, in relation to the findings of the controls periodically

the data controller concerned by this procedure. C. On the applicable law 33. The first paragraph of Article 87 of the Data Protection Act, Article I of

Sectorial Committee of the National Register (CSRN) or by way of an order royal.9 33. The Contentious Chamber underlines that in this case, the Royal Decree of

and 32 GDPR. Moreover, the DPA noted that the controller violated Article 33 GDPR by not notifying the DPA of the data breach. The DPA issued a warning

they did not adhere to Article 33(5) GDPR, nor Article 33(1). The Norwegian DPA held that Trumf had breached Article 33(1) for failing to notify them of

to the Danish DPA in accordance with Article 33(1) of the Danish Data Protection Ordinance (i.e. Article 33 GDPR). Share your comments here! Share blogs

measures to ensure the security of personal data, in violation of Articles 32(1), 33, and 34 GDPR. The controller is Bank of Ireland (BOI). Between 9 November

technical measures to prevent the breach in violation of Article 5(1)(f), Article 33 and Article 34 GDPR. The data breach also revealed that personal and special

Article 33(1) GDPR by failing to notify a personal data breach without undue delay. Our inquiry has only focused on Argon’s compliance with Article 33(1) GDPR

not encrypting a USB flash drive which contained personal data, and Article 33(1) GDPR by not reporting the data breach to the DPA after the USB flash drive

accordance with Article 33(3) GDPR. In this respect, the DPA noted that the controller failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 33(1) GDPR because it did

approximately €5000 (24.740 RON) for violating Articles 5(1)(a), (c), (2), 6, 9 and 33 GDPR. The ANSPDCP especially found that legitimate interest is not a legal

fined a teaching council €60,000 for violations of Articles 5(1)(f), 32(1) and 33(1) GDPR by failing to notify a data breach in due time, and lacking appropriate

controller did not notify the data breach to the DPA with the observance of Article 33(1) GDPR, respectively within 72 hours of having become aware of it. Therefore

5(1)(a) and (f), and for failing to notify the breach in line with Articles 33 and 34 GDPR. The data controller, Piraeus Bank, provided data relating to

the children. The DPC also held that the third breach also violated Article 33(1), because of a failure to notify the DPC without undue delay. Aside from

online Did the breaches reported by UCD infringe Articles 5(1)(f)- 5(1)(e) and 33(1) GDPR? The DPC held that UCD infringed: - Articles 5(1)(f) and 32(1) GDPR

within 72 hours from the moment the controller became aware of it under Article 33 GDPR. Thus it issued a warning as the controller failed notify the DPA. In

thus questioning the content of a standard issued by the executive branch." 6 33. Within the framework of its missions set out in Article 4 of the CPC, the

notification of personal data breaches. In particular, pursuant to Article 33(2) GDPR in the event of a personal data breach, the processor is required

customers who used the internet banking service. Hence, pursuant to Article 33 GDPR, the controller notified the Romanian DPA of a personal data breach.

generalised civic access - pursuant to art. 5, paragraph 2, of Legislative Decree n. 33/2013 - to several schools in the province of Modena aimed at obtaining data

by encryption. The DPA found that the University violated Article 33(1) and Article 33(5) by failing to timely document and report a data breach. According

The Polish DPA found that the controller was in breach of Article 33(1) GDPR, Article 33(3) GDPR, Articles 34(1) and 34(2) GDPR, and Article 5(2) GDPR, Firstly

article 32, subsection 1. 3.2. Article 33 of the Data Protection Regulation It follows from the regulation's article 33, subsection 1, that in the event of

31st, 2013 WAG 2018 § 33 today WAG 2018 § 33 valid from June 15, 2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 37/2018 WAG 2018 § 33 valid from January 3

dates 07/10/2020, 10/30/2020 (2:33 p.m.), 10/30/2020 (12:37 p.m.), 12/03/2020 and 01/26/2021. In the one dated 10/30/2020 (2:33 p.m.), addressed to a "collaborator"

Article 33(1) GDPR. Moreover, it violated Article 34(1) GDPR since it did not provide the data subjects with the information listed in Article 33(3)(b),

business is the retail trade of computers, their peripherals and software. Sales 33. According to information received from Verkkokauppa.com Oyj on November 2

and to submit relevant evidence. Written submissions PPN-01-33#6/01.02.2022 and PPN-01- 33#7/01.02.2022 were submitted in response, expressed respectively

browser and the server hosting the site. 8. Failure to comply with Article 33 GDPR The controller was aware of the breach since 29th September 2020, when

authority, pursuant to Art. 33 paragraph 1 of the Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in Art. 33 paragraph 3 of this regulation

Relevant Law: Article 25(1) GDPR Article 25(2) GDPR Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Article 34 GDPR Article 60 GDPR Type: Complaint Outcome: Rejected Started:

better user management and logging. 3.2. Article 33 of the Data Protection Regulation It follows from Article 33 (1) of the Regulation 1, that the data controller

data has been made in advance. 3.2. Article 33 of the Data Protection Regulation It follows from Article 33 (1) of the Regulation 1, that the data controller

considerable delay and in any case beyond 72 hours as required by Article 33 GDPR. The data breach was notified to the affected controllers about two weeks

authority, in accordance with Art. 33 paragraph 1 of the Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 paragraph 3 of Regulation

controller failed to respect its notification duty under Article 33(1) and Article 33(5). Article 34 was not vioated, as, the data subject was already

Law: Article 32(1)(a) GDPR Article 32(1)(b) GDPR Article 32(2) GDPR Article 33(1) GDPR Article 34(1) GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: Violation Found Started:

[may] 32GwH 51/2014, March 27, 2014, p. 15. 33 cf. supra marginal 8. Decision on the merits 66/2021 - 28/33 exceed one year from receipt of the request

Federal Finance Court, is regulated by the VwGVG, Federal Law Gazette I 2013/33 as amended by Federal Law Gazette I 2013/122 (§ 1 leg.cit.). Pursuant to Section

Authority, cf. Paragraph 2 Article 27 Act no. 90/2018, Coll. Paragraph 1 Article 33 of the Regulation. According to the answers of the Directorate of Labor, it

in February 2021. The Finnish DPA found that the firm had violated Articles 33(1) GDPR (notification of data breaches to the DPA) and Article 34(1) GDPR

The Polish DPA held that a medical facility violated Articles 33(1) and 34(1) GDPR by not notifying the DPA and the data subject of a data breach after

authority, in accordance with Art. 33 sec. 1 of Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 sec. 3 of Regulation 2016/679 and

Polish DPA held that the Polish Chief National Surveyor violated Articles 33(1) and 34(1) GDPR by not notifying the DPA and the data subjects after it

implementeren die later zou worden gevolgd door een definitieve oplossing.”. 33 33 Repliekconclusie verweerder, rn. 15. Beslissing ten gronde 82/2020- 35/48

body (Article 33 (3) of Regulation 2016/679), procedures for keeping an internal register of data protection breaches referred to in Art. 33 paragraph. 5

version of which has been adopted April 11, 2018 (hereafter: "WP 260 rev.01"). 33. Note that the European Data Protection Board (hereafter: "EDPS"), which replaced

□□□□ 2220406-0032- □□ 41- □ 9- □ 1-THE[!]_J Page 33 Court of Appeal Brussels - 2020 / AR / 1111 p. 33Means 6 (mainly): The contested Decision complies

Act (2018) or the Personal Data Act (2000). The Personal Data Act (2018) § 33 first paragraph contains a special transitional rule infringement charge,

2018 pursuant to Act 15 June 2018 no. 38 on the processing of personal data § 33 other joint. At the same time, the Ministry of Justice and Emergency Preparedness

the authority may obtain the information in the CPR, cf., however, section 33 (2). First Information collected through the CPR subscription includes non-sensitive

Article 34 GDPR or the data protection supervisory authority under Article 33 GDPR because the requirements of the legal definition in Article 4(12) GDPR

signature of the applicant or his lawyer. Decision on the substance 57/2023 – 33/33 a contradictory petition must be submitted to the Registry of the Market

damage from criminal offenses (cf. § 34 Para. 1 No. 1 in conjunction Section 33 (1) no. 2 letters a, b, d, f, g BDSG) is not provided for. c) An interest

the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) and Executive Order 123331. 33. The TJEU concluded that such interference is not proportionate under EU law

For its part, the security of personal data comes regulated in articles 32, 33 and 34 of the RGPD, which regulate the security of the processing, notification

interested party C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 33/33 expresses its intention to file a contentious-administrative appeal. If this

PRESIDENT SECURITY OFFICE PERSONAL DATA Warsaw, January 19, 2022 DECISION DKN.5131.33.2021 Based on Article. 104 § 1 of the Act of June 14, 1960, Code of Administrative

authority, in accordance with Art. 33 section 1 of Regulation 2016/679, which must include the information specified in Art. 33 section 3 of Regulation 2016/679

the interests of the Medical List and the users. That is not the case here. (33) The Norwegian Medical Association has filed the following claim: «1. The

violating Italian national law according to Article 26(4) Legislative Decree 33/2013 that sets - among others - limits to publish personal data on recipients

controller. Regarding the personal data breach in itself, under Articles 33(1) and 33(3) GDPR, the controller is obliged to notify the competent national supervisory

82 GDPR (cf. Kühling/Buchner/Jandt, 3rd edition 2020, GDPR Art. 33 para. 81 acc. Art. 33 Para. I S. I GDPR, in the event of a violation of the protection

Since OLVG was legally required to report the data breaches under Article 33(1) GDPR, OLVG claimed that the data breach reports were evidence that it involuntarily

nature is only permitted with due observance of Articles 32 and 33. (…). Articles 32 and 33 of the Implementing Act are an elaboration of the option offered

of, at least, C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 33/33 20% of the amount of the proposed penalty, these being cumulative with each

interests required within the meaning of mildest means (hereinafter (1)). 33 Furthermore, it overlooks the fact that conflicting interests, Fundamental

was not obliged to report the data breach to the DPA according to Article 33(1) GDPR. Regarding the newsletter, the DPA considered it partly as direct

used the new urgency procedure for handling revenge porn based on Article 33-bis of its internal procedural regulation. The DPA introduced the Article

three reports of breaches of personal data security in accordance with Article 33 of the Data Protection Ordinance [1], has become aware that MaCom A / S as

subparagraph c (See KHO's decision (1671/23) of 5 June 2023, paragraphs 31-33, 35, 40 and 42.) Personal data must be appropriate and relevant and limited

violated her portrait right. The paintiff also saw a violation of Articles 33, 35 and 36 of the GDPR, which the defendant has not contested. The Court found

this notification satisfied the requirements of Article 34(2) and Article 33(3) GDPR. The DPA expressed serious criticism to the controller for violating

supervisory body, pursuant to Art. 33 paragraph 1 of the Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 sec. 3 of Regulation 2016/679

always communicated to the defendant's partners against direct marketing. 33. With regard to the conclusion of the processor agreement in accordance with

(the Disputes Chamber underlines). Decision on the merits 24/2021 - 10/44 33. In its case law, the Court of Justice has defined the concept of 'controller'

individuals with regard to the processing of personal data Page 33 Decision 55/2021 - 33/34personal character, it cannot impose a fine on the defendant

two members, this decision is made by the chairman, sitting alone (Article 33, §1, paragraph 3 WOG). II. Motivation a) Competence of the Data Protection

complainants and defendants present as well as counsel for the defendants. 33. The details and additions were made in the minutes of the hearing adopted

as required by Article 33(5) GDPR 16. Secondly, with regard to the investigation of incidents within the meaning of Article 33(5) GDPR, the Inspectorate

particular articles L.111-1, L.111-2, L.111-3, L.221- 15, L.224-30, L.224-29, L.224-33, L.212-1, L.212-3, L.2141-1, L.211-1, L.232-1, R.631-3, L.621-1, L.621-2,

21. … 22. … 23. … 24. … 25. … 26. … 27. … 28. … 29. … 30. … 31 .. .. 32. .. 33. .. 34. .. 35. . public interest" for the professional activities of the complainant

disclosure of the information was mandatory under Italian law (legislative decree 33/2013). The candidate later submitted a complaint to the Italian DPA. The controller

Federal Law Gazette I No. 33/2013 VwGG § 33 valid from 03/01/2013 to 12/31/2013 last changed by BGBl. I No. 33/2013 VwGG § 33 valid from 07/01/2008 to 02/28/2013

Article 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 33. 33. The Litigation Chamber refers in this respect to the judgment of the Court

Article 14 GDPR, Article 15 GDPR, Article 28 GDPR, Article 32 GDPR and Article 33 GDPR, as well as of Article L. 34-5 of the French Post and Electronic Communications

of Art. 33 Para. 3 lit. b GDPR, providing the contact details. 59 (b) The defendant also informed the plaintiff within the meaning of Art. 33 Para. 3 lit

Paragraph9 1. The fiscal remedy is inadmissible. Paragraph10 a. Pursuant to section 33(1) no. 1 of the Financial Court Code (Finanzgerichtsordnung - FGO), recourse

and does not distinguish between those and the personal data (...Paragraph 33: However, it is the search engine manager who determines the purposes and

OF HRK 1,200.00 (in letters: one thousand two hundred kuna). Based on Art. 33, paragraph 11 of the Misdemeanor Code, the defendant is obliged to pay a fine

exceptions listed in Articles 32 and 33 Implementation Act. Although Brein can rely on the exception laid down in Article 33(2)(b) Implementation Act, since

decision: 30The admissible action is unfounded. 31A. 32The action is admissible. 33I. 34The admissibility of the claim does not conflict with the vagueness of

should have also been notified to the DPA and the claimant pursuant to Articles 33 and 34 due to the high risks to her rights and freedoms. Claimant did not

according to Art. 15 (4) GDPR (Gola GDPR/Franck, 2nd ed. 2018, GDPR Art. 15 Rn. 33, 34). It is argued that this restriction is not only limited to the right

above the base interest rate since lis pendens. 32 The defendant requests, 33 dismiss the appeal. 34 The defendant defends the judgement of the first instance

balancing of interests that is to be done. The tribunal refers to sections 26 to 33, which apply to the data subject's right to protest, and the exceptions to

information, such as in particular: a) political background information [...] " 33. It follows from the cited provisions of Section 2 f (1) FOG that the Respondent

proceedings would therefore have to be discontinued due to a procedural impediment. 33 2. The decision on costs is based on §§ 71 OWiG, 467 paragraph 1, paragraph

for the processing must be, cf. Prop. 56 LS (2017-2018) section 6.3.2 page 33. Transparency Overall, it is the Data Inspectorate's assessment that there

the use of regular mail, the cost of such operation would amount to over PLN 33 749 175 (the amount obtained by multiplying the number of data subjects to

within 72 hours of becoming aware of the data breach in accordance with Article 33(1) of the GDPR. 7 ICO. Information Commissioner's Office Circumstances surrounding

Hospital notified the Italian DPA of a personal data breach pursuant to Article 33 GDPR. The hospital accidentally sent to all the patients involved in a clinical

(Articles 94-97 WOG)". ' A summary of these four new pleas was included in Rn. 33 of the contested decision. Cf. contested decision, Rn. 34. Cf. contested decision

regard to the two video cameras numbered 11 and 33. With regard to the two video cameras numbered 11 and 33, which film the corridors in front of the children's

that focuses on providing consultancy and advice of information technology. 33. The services for NVIS are provided by the following organizational units

1863 / 2014, from ANSR, of 02Jan., With periodic verification by IPQ on 10.33.2013. The news report was prepared based on the elements collected through

and in accordance with, Section 110(1) of the Data Protection Act, 2018: 10 33. An Coimisiin um Chosaint SonraiData Protection Commission d) Whether Airbnb

attachment has (also) been imposed on this debt and that she will repay € 10.33 per month on this debt. 2.4. The BKR has registered 24 March 2017 as the end

access requests. The authority pointed out that the controller did answer to 33% of the access requests with undue delay. Indeed, the Authority underlined

solution "SelvBooking" was developed. 3.2. Article 33 of the Data Protection Regulation It follows from Article 33 (1) of the Regulation 1, that the data controller

processing carried out by that controller, in accordance with the procedure set out 33 in Article 60 GDPR. It must, however, be noted that the GDPR establishes exceptions

Binding Decision 01/2020, paragraph 195. 899 Draft Decision, paragraphs 9.32 - 9.33. 900 DE SAs Objection, p. 19. 901 EDPB Guidelines on calculation of fines

KHO:2024:34 Issue date: 19 March 2024 Volume number: 707 Diary number(s): 33/2022 ECLI identifier: ECLI:FI:KHO:2024:34 A had asked Google to remove several

offences in Article 83(4) to (6) of the GDPR (cf. BeckOK, DatenschutzR/Holländer, 33rd ed. 01.08.2020 GDPR Art. 83 Rn. 11, 21; Gola/Heckmann/Ehmann, 13th ed. 2019

additional data breach notification that it sent to the CNIL on February 26, 2020. 33. It is therefore up to the Restricted Committee to examine, in the light of

than 60 days after the date of the event causing the breach, and more than 33% of the total number of reports were events identified by the Company more

Legislative Decree lgs. 14 March 2013, no. 33, upon publication of the determination in question, it is stated that decree no. 33 of 2013 does not contain any specific

of confidentiality, integrity or availability), the provisions of article 33 of the GDPR for the notification of the incident to the supervisory authority

For its part, the security of personal data comes regulated in articles 32, 33 and 34 of the GDPR, which regulate the security of the treatment, the notification

compliance, despite the specific injunctions which had been addressed to it. 33. In addition, the municipality failed in its obligation to cooperate with

as Data Processor of personal data according to the definition of article 33 of Organic Law 3/2018 (…). However, we would like to inform you that we will

EU:C:1982:335, para. 21; judgment of 15 September 2005, C-495/03, EU:C:2005:552, para. 33; judgment of 6 December 2005, C-461/03, EU:C:2005:742, para. 16; established

policyholder must first notify the insurer of the occurrence of the insured event (§ 33 VersVG) and then, upon request, provide the insurer with further information

cancelled the only invoice generated on January 1, 2018 for an amount of 0.33 euros in relation to the line ***TELÉFONO.1. They indicate that the claimant's

on the defendants for the infringements of the Articles 5.1.f, 5.2, 24, 32, 33.1 and 5, 34.1 GDPR." By decision of 19 May 2021, the Disputes Chamber withdrew

information and does not distinguish between these and personal data. (…) Paragraph 33: However, it is the search engine manager who determines the ends and means

2021, 410 Rn. 47; Paal / Pauly / Paal, 3rd edition 2021, GDPR Art. 15 Rn. 33 -39) to check the lawfulness of the data processing. 19th 4) According to

the wording, context and objectives of the regulation (see ibid., paragraph 33) ( ibid., paragraph 37). The provision should be viewed in connection with

marginal no. 16 et seq. January 2012, Dominguez, C-282/10, EU:C:2012:33, marginal 33 ff.; judgment of 21 November 2018, Ayubi, C-713/17, EU:C:2018:929, marginal

upon to comply with the provisions of art. 23, c. 1, legislative decree n. 33/2013 and art. 1, co. 16 of the l. n. 190/2012, proceeding with the publication

complainant confirms that she feels sufficiently heard by the Disputes Chamber. 33. In order to give the defendant the opportunity to defend himself/herself

recordings resumed. The Debtor has sent a letter dated 15 June 2018 entitled “33. circular ’, which circular 5.4. contains the Debtor's decision to operate

the oral hearing of these proceedings in the first instance (see paragraph 3.33.). In addition, [the employee] deliberately also recorded work on a day on

that the C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 33 33/184 person identified with the name, two surnames and NIF of the claimant

data breach notification from the controller Vodafone Romania under Article 33 GDPR, the Romanian DPA started an investigation and found that Vodafone had

Company") notified the Authority of two personal data violations, pursuant to art. 33 of the Regulation, dated XX and XX, concerning, respectively: a) the delivery

sanctioned by national supervisory authorities not sitting on this committee. 33. It emphasizes that the EDPS also shares the same interpretation, having specified

fulfilling transparency obligations under Article 22 of Legislative Decree 33/2013. The controller also contended that it did not process the data received

seems to him to be contrary to the law. Decision on merits 149/2023 — 10/36 33. Complainant No. 2 produces the email he sent to the first respondent on July

procedure, one or more of the following measures: 1° A call to order; […] " 33. Under 7° of III of article 20 of the law of January 6, 1978 as amended, in

data protection. The security of personal data is regulated in articles 32, 33 and 34 of the GDPR. Article 32 of the RGPD "Security of treatment", establishes

protection of the processing of personal data. 11. In application of article 33, § 1 of the LCA, the Litigation Chamber is the body of administrative litigation

EU:C:2021:504, paragraph 61, judgment Nowak, C-434/16, EU:C:2017:994, paragraph 33 and judgment Rijkeboer, C-553/07, EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 59. Page 13 of

deepened by the violations of the GDPR following the scraping incident (Articles 33, 34 GDPR on the one hand and Article 15 GDPR on the other). should have been

to follow when accessing the trail data collected by the electronic tags. 33. In addition, the Home Office provided the Commissioner with an Appropriate

subject. The controller also self-reported the breach to the DPA under Article 33. Criminal proceedings were also launched against the controller’s data protection

Creditinfo refers to the obligations imposed on lenders according to Act no. 33/2013 on consumer loans, which, among other things, aims to prevent lending

of Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 33.Article 1(b) of Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of

seconds showing the entrance to the store, and a recording of 1 minute and 33 seconds showing the checkout area in the store. We assume that some of these

According to § 17 Administrative Court Procedure Act, Federal Law Gazette I No. 33/2013 as amended (VwGVG) in conjunction with § 38 General Administrative Procedure

forwarded to the DPA the notification of the violation pursuant to Article 33 GDPR ascertaining its willingness to cooperate with the supervisory authority

result from its disclosure or unauthorized access to them. According to Article 33 (1) of the General Data Protection Regulation, a data protection incident

notified the Romanian DPA of several data breaches, in accordance with Article 33 GDPR. Following these notifications, the DPA opened an investigation against

tax debtor in the sense of § 43 AO and thus a taxpayer in accordance with § 33 AO. Consequently, the plaintiff could now assert all rights to information

bottom which contained a link to the data protection policy. Not only the 33WP 260 rev.01, point 11. 34 35Idem. 36Annex 1 to the investigation report,

(lawfulness of the processing) and article 5.1. c) (principle minimization) 33. The Litigation Chamber recalls that pursuant to Article 6 of the GDPR, the

part of the public highway and a neighbouring property. surrounding land. 13 33. In its letter of 6 May 2019, the auditee stated that it was "currently limiting

the second defendant [X1 a 32Court of Appeal Brussels -2021 / AR / 163p. 33 c / ary and detailed privacy policy and has endeavored to comply with all

from Alpha Bank Romania (controller) to the Romanian DPA pursuant to Article 33 GDPR. The controller reported that a document was sent to another recipient

controller failed to notify the DPA within 72 hours, in violation of Articles 33; d) the controller failed to implement sufficient technical and organisational

DPA of a personal data breach. The notification was made pursuent to Article 33 GDPR. The notification stated that the breach occurred due to a technical

managers use C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 33 33/97 only the database that VDF has provided them and during the periods that

by letter, date. 1 March 2018. States that pursuant to Article 10 of Law No 33/2013 on consumer credit the lender should an assessment of the creditworthiness

with the second paragraph of Article 32 and the second paragraph of Article 33 of ZVOP 2, the findings essential for the decision in the subject matter were

controller did not appropriately notify the security breach as required by Article 33(1) and Article 34(1) GDPR. Regarding its first decision, the DPA pointed out

the Constituency by contravening the (information) obligations of Articles 33 and 34 Wbp and/or Articles 12, 13 and 14 General Data Protection Regulation3

€2000). Based on a notification of a personal data breach pursuant to Article 33 GDPR by Casa Rusu SRL, a controller, the Romanian DPA started an investigation

Federal Law Gazette I No. 33/2013 VStG § 64 valid from 01.07.2013 to 31.12.2013 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 33/2013 VStG § 64 valid from

violations of constitutional rights from Articles 2, 14, 21, 22, 23, 25, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 42, Articles 49, 50, 53, 67, 74 and 78 of the Constitution and

is ordered to release the plaintiff from pre-trial legal fees of €282.15. 33. Otherwise the action is dismissed. 44. The plaintiff bears 71% of the costs

rights of data subjects in favour of the controller (the 'balancing test'). 33. As regards the first condition (the so-called 'purpose test'), the AVG acknowledges

information and do not distinguish between it and personal data”. Section 33: “Now, the operator of the search engine is the one who determines the purposes

the file was notified to the respondent, with the date of delivery being 10:33 on 04/03/2019. In accordance with Article 73.1 of the LPACAP, 'The formalities

has notified the Guarantor of a violation of personal data pursuant to art. 33 of the Regulation in relation to the report made on 29 August 2018 by the

(cf. Horn/Hofmann, in: Beck VergabeR, 4th ed. 2022, GWB § 160, paras. 26, 33). e. The applicant filed the application for review within the time limit

Article 48 of the Slovenian Act (No. 21/13, 78/13 - afterwards, 47/15 - ZZSDT, 33/16 - PZ-F, 52/16, 15/17 - dec. US, 22/19 - ZPosS and 81/19, hereafter ‘ZDR-1’)

defendant 2.1 has not fulfilled his duty to inform according to Art. 14 DSGVO, § 33 BDSG, § 46 BDSG; 2.2 has not fulfilled the plaintiff's rights to information

that a constructive dialogue with the defendant is apparently impossible. 33. By means of the correspondence communicated by the Primary Care Service to

connection with personal data processed by NautaDutilh within the meaning of Art. 33 yo. art. 4 preamble and under 12 GDPR, which until the date of the decision

fulfill a legal obligation under other laws, such as the Consumer Credit Act no. 33/2013. It is noted that the company only requests the information that is necessary

ZIUOPDVE and 3/22 – ZDeb. 3 Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, no. 33/91-I, 42/97 - UZS68, 66/00 - UZ80, 24/03 - UZ3a, 47, 68, 69/04 - UZ14, 69/04

interested party. Without invalidating the obligations relating to consent, recital 33 of the Regulation recognizes that “In many cases it is not possible to fully

the pronouncement of a corrective measure. from the supervisory authority. 33. It notes, in this regard, that this provision must be interpreted in the

comparable in this respect, the judgments of December 20, 2017, C-434/16, para 33, as well as of May 7, 2009, C-553/07, para 59). It is not overlooked that

in the communication the right you wantexercise. Via *** URL.2 to *** URL.33.- A text and a control system were available for sending communicationsby

be noted that the security of personal data It is regulated in articles 32, 33 and 34 of the RGPD. Article 32 of the RGPD "Security of treatment", establishes

a - possibly vague - restriction cannot be inferred from the application. 33c) The application is unfounded because it is too broad. 34aa) Even if one

minutes of the meeting of November 18, 2021. Reasons for decision I Paragraph 33 The plaintiff's appeal, which is permissible under Section 64 (2) ArbGG, was

this point, the principle of minimum data processing (Article 5.1. c) GDPR). 33. In order to check whether the third condition of Article 6.1 f) GDPR - the

in line with the reporting obligation under the Privacy Ordinance Article 33. The discrepancy was first reported orally, but additional information was

and able to comply with these requirements certified by the controller. § 33 (6) of the Medicinal Products Act prohibits pharmacies from publishing prescriptions

that the controller likely violated Articles 5(1)(c), 5(1)(f), 27, 32 and 33 GDPR. With regard to the data minimisation violation, the AEPD found that

requested the processor to "report a personal data breach". Under Article 33 GDPR, it is the controller's duty to report breaches, while processors may

01-00001823325-0032-0040-02-01-� L _J, Court of Appeal Brussels - 2020/AR/813- p. 33 By registered letter dated 24 July 2019 (document 6 GBA), the Disputes Chamber

investigation report. 6.3. Violation of lawfulness in the three processing operations 33 Article 5, first paragraph, preamble, under a, of the GDPR specifies that

the Norwegian legislation and its development case no. 19-014740SIV-HRET (33) As an introduction to my further discussion, I find it appropriate to give

ENFORCEMENT NOTICE To: Emailmovers Limited Of: C/O Jackson Robson Licence 33-35 Exchange Street Driffield East Yorkshire YO25 6LL 1. The Information Commissioner

the Regional Court of Cologne (Landgericht Köln, LG Köln) decided in case 33 O 376/22 on an action brought by the North Rhine-Westphalia Consumer Centre

pharmacy and may only be provided by pharmaceutical staff of this pharmacy. 33. It is therefore irrelevant whether the customer reviews are attributable

main claim            EUR 2,022.37 32Credit reform file number            N04 33Date of default                         00.00.0000 34Completion Date           

notification of this decision. For the rest, the requests will be rejected. Penalty 4.33. The requested penalty will be rejected. For the time being, the trust is

what the applicable lawful base is. Decision on the merits 03/2021 - 11/11 33. Considering the importance of transparency with regard to the decision-making

to the protection of the processing of personal data. Pursuant to Article 33 §1 of the DPA, the Litigation Chamber is the administrative litigation body

proceedings are of the same nature as in the earlier phase of the procedure. 33. This means that the WOG itself already provides that the person submitting

DPA of the breach, within the 72 hour prescribed time-frame under Article 33(1) GDPR. Following the notification, the Hungarian DPA initiated an investigation

tourist tax – is authorized in execution of this article 5.1.c) of the GDPR. 33. As this tourist tax is calculated annually and on the basis of a flat rate

scraping incident does not constitute a reportable violation under Article 33 of the GDPR. (No. 37) (editorial principle) 3. Non-material damage that can

May 2018 on the protection of personal data (Journal of Laws of 2010, No. 33, item 159, as amended). 1 - 3 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European

the legal director, himself to the administrative and financial director. " 33. Regarding the establishment of an activity report, the head of the investigation

of using the telephone number for the CIT as well as a violation of Article 33 GDPR because The scraping incident was not reported to the supervisory authority

Article 84 of the Law of 17 June 2016 and Articles 33 and 35 of the Law of 18 June 2016. 2016 and 33 and 35 of the Royal Decree of 18 April 2017. The Special

Berlin-Brandenburg, judgment of January 26, 2011 - OVG 9 N 62.11 - quoted from juris, para. 33; for the administration of a sales volume meter: VG Potsdam, judgment of April

Programme. The nature of the personal data and special category data disclosed 33. As part of its guidance and resources relating to UK GDPR, the Commissioner

directly from the provisions in articles 5, subsection 1, letter f, 24, 25, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 and 39, that the data controller must deal with the risk to the

EU:C:2021:504, paragraph 61, judgment Nowak, C-434/16, EU:C:2017:994, paragraph 33 and judgment Rijkeboer, C-553/07, EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 59. Page 15 of

pursuant to art. 33 of the Regulation The Company in relation to the violation of personal data, notified to the Guarantor, pursuant to art. 33 of the Regulation

However, the result was that the dismissal of the Restore the first judgement. [33] The decision on the costs of the The appeal procedure is based on §§ 41,

The worker can therefore be considered to have been freely given consent. 33. As to the specific nature of consent, the Litigation Chamber considers that

from the specific comments on the provision [2]: “It is clear from section 33 of the Personal Data Act that a registered person who has been notified pursuant

processing of personal data which are or will be contained in a register. Article 33. In the event of a breach of personal data security, the controller shall