Search results

obligation of secrecy. Recital 171: Repeal of Directive 95/46/EC and Transition Phase Directive 95/46/EC should be repealed by this Regulation. Processing already

consistent with Article 6(1) of the previous Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. Some of the principles are also reflected in Article 8 of the EU Charter

institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 applies. Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and other Union legal acts applicable to such

2021, 3rd Edition) citing Article 2(a) Directive 2006/114/EC and Article 13(1) Directive 2002/58/EC; Kamann, Braun in Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung

data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119, 4 May 2016 (available here)

general and horizontal law on data protection implementing Directive 95/46/EC, Member States have several sector-specific laws in areas that need more specific

Article 94 - Repeal of Directive 95/46/EC 1. Directive 95/46/EC is repealed with effect from 25 May 2018. 2. References to the repealed Directive shall

the same objective set out in Directive 2002/58/EC. Recital 173: Relationship to Directive 2002/58/EC This Regulation should apply to all matters concerning

movement of such data. Recital 17: Adaptation of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council applies

95/46/EC. By October 1998 all EU Member States had to pass a national data protection act that was aligned with Directive 95/46/EC. Directive 95/46/EC allowed

or supervisory authority on the basis of Article 26(2) of Directive 95/46/EC shall remain valid until amended, replaced or repealed, if necessary, by that

well-being of natural persons. Recital 3: Directive 95/46/EC Harmonisation Goal Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council seeks to

The scope of what falls under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 is fairly broad. Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 provides that documents which

throughout the GDPR. Some definitions are taken from the preceding Directive 95/46/EC, allowing an understanding to build upon the already existing terms. Other

should draw from Article 2 of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. Recital 82: Maintenance and Availability of Records In order to demonstrate

40 GDPR elaborates upon a pre-existing provision under the Directive 95/46/EC (Data Protection Directive – DPD), specifically Article 27(1). Accordingly

'rapidly' and 'efficiently' under Article 5(1)(c) eCommerce Directive 2000/31/EC. To ensure that the rights of data subjects are not undermined, Article 12

with Member State law. Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council <ref>Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament

"[t]his wording is identical to that found in Recital 19 of Directive 95/46/EC, to which reference has been made in several CJEU rulings broadening the interpretation

Regulation and decisions adopted on the basis of Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC; (b) Chapter VII on cooperation and consistency. 3. For the purpose of paragraph

with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each Member State

56; (b) the national accreditation body named in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (20) in accordance

with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each Member State

Article and decisions adopted on the basis of Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC. 5. The Commission shall, where available information reveals, in particular

no equivalent to Article 33 GDPR under the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. Indeed, Article 17 of the Directive only required controllers to take adequate

with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each Member State

Fundamental Rights of the European Union ("CFR"), as well as Directive 95/46/EC. In the event that such verification is successful, the agreement will remain

Recital 89: Abolishment of Indiscriminate General Notification Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify the processing of personal data

to Recital 54 GDPR, the wording “public health” corresponds to Regulation (EC) No 1338/2008, which includes “all elements related to health, namely health

should draw from Article 2 of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. Recital 148: Penalties In order to strengthen the enforcement of the rules

address, etc.)”. In practice, Article 5(1)(c) of the eCommerce Directive 2000/31/EC requires an email address for any service provider. This conclusion is also

Recital 89: Abolishment of Indiscriminate General Notification Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify the processing of personal data

are therefore withdrawn from the EDPS’s oversight (Article 46 Regulation (EC) No. 45/2001) and are obliged to maintain secrecy vis-à-vis their employer

free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC, available here. Case T-198/03, Bank Austria Creditanstalt

GDPR can be partially retraced to the GDPR’s predecessor, the Directive 95/46/EC (DPD). In particular, Article 18 DPD mentioned the role of a ‘data protection

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

roots in Article 18(2) of the Data Protection Directive 1995 (Directive 95/46/EC) (DPD). However, although the DPD spoke about the designation of a DPO, it

702 (Oxford University Press 2020). In addition, although Directive 95/46/EC did not require organisations to appoint a DPO, this nevertheless became an

with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each Member State

was no equivalent to Article 34 GDPR in the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. Additionally, Article 17 thereof was the only comparable provision, requiring

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each Member State

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

enforce the law in the same vein. The GDPR's predecessor, Directive 95/46/EC ("DPD"), was criticised for its fragmented enforcement of the right to data

a complaint procedure. At the European level, Article 46(b) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 contains a similar ex officio duty of investigation for the European

covered by Member State law on public access to documents. Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council leaves intact and in no way

CJEU in Google Spain in relation to the GDPR's predecessor, Directive 95/46/EC, adopted a wide interpretation of the term 'establishment'. The CJEU considered

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each Member State

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

mandatory. Article 22 GDPR has its roots in Articles 12a and 15 of the 95/46/EC Data Protection Directive (DPD). One of the main differences is that the GDPR

that context, ‘public health’ should be interpreted as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1338/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, namely all elements

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

the sector covered by the code. Although the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (DPD) included a provision on codes of conduct (Article 27(1) DPD), this did

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, which is the Statutory Instrument that implemented the ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC. The Privacy and

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

for EUIs (European Institutions) came into force in 2001 under Regulation (EC) 45/2001. Under this regulation the EDPS was created and designated as the

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

justified by the fact that the privilege already existed under the Directive 95/46/EC as already affirmed by the WP29: "controller and processor and their staff

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

landmark cases concerning the interpretation of Article 28(1) of Directive 95/46/EC ("DPD"), the Regulation's predecessor. Article 28(1) DPD established the existence

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

Human Rights, 14  September 2010, Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. The Netherlands, EC:ECHR:2010:0914JUD003822403, margin number 83: “Further, as regards the words

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded

Recital 17: Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 applies to the processing of personal data by Union institutions, bodies and offices Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the

under provisions of the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC, the ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC, and the GDPR to the CJEU. The case was referred to the Court

95/46/EC Article 14(1)(a) Directive 95/46/EC Article 2(d) Directive 95/46/EC Article 4(1)(a) Directive 95/46/EC Article 4(1)(c) Directive 95/46/EC Article

Article 28(1) Directive 95/46/EC Article 28(3) Directive 95/46/EC Article 4(1)(a) Directive 95/46/EC Article 28(6) Directive 95/46/EC Decided: 01.10.2015 Parties:

legitimate interests in the context of the old Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC), which contained a remarkably similar provision to the new Article 6(1)(f)

until the enactment of the Personal Data Act of 2000, which built on Directive EC/95/46. In 2014, human rights inspired by the ECHR was incorporated into the

fill this section! Italy has implemented Directive 2002/58/EC (as amended by Directive 2009/136/EC) mainly in Articles are 121 - 132-quater of the Code. Cookies

95/46 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of personal data (hereinafter after Directive 95/46 / EC on the

of the ePrivacy Directive should be cited as "Article 5 Directive 2002/58/EC." When there is a common name for an act that allows the reader to understand

Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 is the Statutory Instrument that implemented the ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC. The Privacy and Electronic

Directive 95/46 Article 1(1) Directive 2009/22/EC Article 10 Directive 95/46 Article 2 Directive 2009/22/EC Article 2 Directive 95/46 Article 22 Directive

Dutch law in 1988 in the form of the Wet persoonsregistraties. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection

European Union Relevant Law: Article 15 GDPR Article 2(a) Directive 95/46/EC Decided: 20.12.2017 Parties: Peter Nowak Data Protection Commissioner Case

hallinto-oikeus). The reference related to the interpretation of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection

countries, although it contemplated several exceptions. Following Directive 95/46/EC, the Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal (Organic Law

data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC . 16 years You can help us fill this section! In particular, the abovementioned

the breach by an employee vicariously (see Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition

These acts were replaced in 2000 with the national implementation of Directive EC/95/46 through the Act on Processing of Personal Data (Persondataloven). Privacy

138(1)/2001 for the harmonisation of national law with the Directive 95/46/EC. This law was amended in 2003 (L. 37(I)/2003) and 2012 (L. 105(I)/2012). After

the first data protection law in 1979 (BGBl I Nr. 565/1978). Directive 95/46/EC was implemented by the Data Protection Act 2000 (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG 2000)

personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (- the GDPR - OJ EU L No 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1) be interpreted as meaning that

Directive 95/46/EC" of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of personal data (hereinafter "Directive 95/46/EC on the

communications sector, as amended by Directive 2006/24/EC of 15 March 2006 and by Directive 2009/136/EC of 25 November 2009 (hereinafter "ePrivacy Directive")

‘freely given’ wishes, within the meaning of Article 2(h) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection

Law 2472/1997 implemented the Directive 95/46/EC and was the first Greek law for the protection of individuals from the processing of personal data. By

https://www.[REDACTED]at/ - dt: [REDACTED]at home page - [REDACTED] - ea: / - ec: scroll depth - el: 25 - gjid: - gtm: 2wg871PHBM94Q - ea: 0 - jid: - ni: 0

administrative decision. 3.4. The provision of Article 19(3) of Regulation (EC) No . W. according to which "Before doing justice, the judge, i any state

Council Regulation (EC) No. 2157/2001 on the Statute for a European Company. SEAG in conjunction with Article 1(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 2157/2001

data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter “GDPR”); In view of the law

to Directive 2009/136 / EC of 25 November 2009, of the European Parliament and of the Council, amending Directive 2002/22 / EC on universal service and

2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, and Directive 2002/58/EC of the

free flow of such data and about the cancellation of avr med directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Page 3 of 23The Swedish Privacy Agency

No separate data protection law. Directive 95/46/EC was implemented by the Personal Data Protection Act (Закон за защита на личните данни), promulgated

data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). An English translation is available

Charter respectively." As a result, the CJEU held that: "Directives: 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal

data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC ( General Data Protection Regulation), OJEU 2016, L 119/1. 2 Amsterdam District

personal data, on the free movement of data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ L 119/1 of May 4, 2016, p. 1; hereinafter

fulfil the principle of necessity in terms of Article 7(e) Directive 95/46/EC and the prohibition of discrimination, unless it contains only the data necessary

DSRL 95/46/EC, Article 85 DSGVO - so-called media privilege; see above, marginal no. 11 f.). The reference in Article 9 of the DSRL 95/46/EC to certain

suspected that such a national law may have been in violation of Directive 95/46/EC. In particular, the provision on which disclosure of employees’ data was based

free flow of such data and about the cancellation of aver med directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Page 3 of 27The Swedish Privacy Agency

personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter 'the Regulation'). Having

sector). That Directive has been amended by Directive 2009/136 / EC (Directive 2009/136 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009

data and to the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Regulation on the free movement of data protection), hereinafter

Directive 2002/87 / EC and repealing Directives 2006/48 / EC and 2006/49 / EC ". 17 See e.g. art. 15 Council Directive 2000/43 / EC of 29 June 2000 "applying

communications sector - as amended by Directive 2006/24/EC of March 15, 2006 and by Directive 2009/136/EC of November 25, 2009 (hereinafter the "ePrivacy Directive")

personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ 2016 L 119/1, p. 1; hereinafter 'GDPR')

personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (the General Data Protection Regulation), are: Article 5 Principles for the

Union Relevant Law: Article 13 Directive 95/46/EC Article 2(a) Directive 95/46/EC Article 2(b) Directive 95/46/EC Decided: 19.04.2012 Parties: Bonnier Audio

issued a decision related to the right to be forgotten under Directive 95/46/EC. Google LLC (Google Spain, S.L) did not respond to a deletion request. The

the free movement of such data (RGPD); Having regard to Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the

Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of personal data (hereinafter Directive 95/46/EC on the protection

Electronic Commerce, which transposes into Spanish law the Directive 2000/31/EC on electronic commerce). However, the entity made use of two attenuating factors

Directive refers to Directive 95/46/EC, and in accordance with art. 94,paragraph 2 AVG should all references to Directive 95/46 / EC should be read as referencesto

the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC and was further specified there (see Articles 2, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 14 DSRL 95/46/EC; see ECJ, judgment of 13 May 2014

Law: Article 6(1) GDPR Article 6(3) GDPR Article 9(1) GDPR Decision: 2008/801/EC The Lietuvos Respublikos viešųjų ir privačių interesų derinimo valstybinėje

Directive 95/46/EC should be read as references to the AVG8. This also applies to references to consent in the current Directive 2002/58/EC as the e-Privacy

Communications Act § 2(7)(b) (cf. Article 5(3) ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC), where the Norwegian Communications Authority is the right supervisory authority

personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/ 46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ L 119 of May 4, 2016, p. 1, hereinafter:

data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 95/46/EC.221 Article 1 - Right to object(1) The data subject shall have the right

privacy and integrity and would be contrary to Article 8(b) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001. The court held

the Directive on privacy and electronic communications (Directive 2002/58/EC) make different specifications. The legislature aims to pass a new Telecommunications

Electronic Commerce, which transposes into Spanish law the Directive 2000/31/EC on electronic commerce). However, the company made use of two attenuating

data and to the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Regulation on the free movement of data protection), hereinafter

personal data and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general regulation on data protection), hereinafter GDPR; Considering the

personal data and the free flow of such data and the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC of April 27, 2016 ( EU Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and

free flow of such data and about the cancellation of avr med directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Page 3 of 25The Swedish Privacy Agency

free flow of such data and about the cancellation of avr med directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Page 3 of 24The Swedish Privacy Agency

provisions of art. 3 para. (1) and para. (3) lit. a) and b) of Law no. Regulation (EC) No 506/2004, as amended and supplemented, provides: "1. The provider of an

appropriately designated as the National Security Regulation (ECT510313/EC/EC)The Authority therefore considers that in the present case it has not been

personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 04.05.2016, p. 1 and OJ L

the Guidelines of the Working Group of article 29 of the Directive95/46 / EC (now European Data Protection Council - EDPB) on Notificationpersonal data

cross-border traffic. The case was decided under the national implementation of 95/46/EC. The investigation started after the DPA was notified of a personal data breach

personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.05.2016, p. 1 and OJ L 127

data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter AVG; Having regard to

Directive 95/46/EC remains relevant to this day. Article 6(1) of the GDPR takes over the wording from Article 7 of Directive 95/46/EC. 8 CJEU, 11 December

2016/681 of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 April 2016, 2004/82/EC of the Council of 29 April 2004 and 2010/65/EU of the European Parliament

should be remembered that Law No. 32/2008 transposed Directive No. 2006/24 / EC , of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 15 March, on the conservation

|GDPR_Article_20= |GDPR_Article_Link_20= |EU_Law_Name_1=Article 4 Directive 2002/58/EC |EU_Law_Link_1=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=C

|GDPR_Article_20= |GDPR_Article_Link_20= |EU_Law_Name_1=Article 4 Directive 2002/58/EC |EU_Law_Link_1=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=C

data, on the free movement of data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter : "GDPR"), OJ No. L 119 of

and UK national laws on data retention with Art.15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy Directive) and Art.7, 8 and Art.52(1) of the EU Charter of Fundamental

90 (ninety) days for the practice of an infraction to art. 27º nº 1 of the EC. To this end, it presented the following Conclusions: i.- By decision rendered

of Directive (EU) 2016/680; Art. 41 of Regulation (EC) No. 1987/2006 or Art. 37 of Regulation (EC) No. 767/2008). Since in the present case the ZaDiG

personal dataand onthe freemovement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) OJ [2016] L 119/1. 2 3See section 7.2

personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter: "Regulation"); Having

personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; Having regard to the

Articles 5 and 6 Law 3471/2006 (national law implementing the Directive 2002/58/EC Directive on privacy and electronic communications). The processing and storage

In order to examine the compliance of Regulation (EC) No 2016/679 repealing Directive 2016/679 / EC (hereinafter referred to as the General Data Protection

data and the free circulation of these data and which repeals Directive 95/46/EC (General Regulation of data protection, GDPR) defines in its article 4.14

data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation ) (Journal of Laws UE L 119 of 04/05/2016

well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter the "Regulation"); GIVEN

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 8 Directive 95/46/EC, Article 3(2) Directive (EU) 2016/680, Recital 13 Latvia Road Traffic Law

emails according to the definitions of Law 3471/2006 and Directive 2002/58/EC. 5. Political communication by electronic means without human intervention

legitimate interests of the data controller under Article 7 of Directive 95/46 / EC, pp. 16-17. It is quite clear that email addresses are not strictly necessary

and on the free movement of such data and on repealing the Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) SLEU L119 and Article 34 of the Law on

personal data and on the movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC EC (General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR) for violation of Art. 5, § 1,

and regarding the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation or AVG)', of the advice of the Flemish

personal data and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general regulation on the protection data), hereinafter GDPR; Having regard

personal data and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general regulation on the protection data), hereinafter GDPR; Having regard

free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC, OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39. 1        Contents   I. PROCEEDINGS

data by natural persons the free movement of such data and Directive 95/46 / EC Regulation (EU) 2016/679 repealing Directive (hereinafter referred to as General

personal data, on the free movement of data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - GDPR) just

personal data and the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) SLEU L119 (hereinafter: General Regulation)

Directive 95/46/EC remains relevant to this day. Article 6.1 of the GDPR in fact repeats the terms of article 7 of the directive 95/46/EC - the legitimate

processing of personal data by the Union institutions, governed by Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000

personal data, on the free movement of data and the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) - GDPR, OJ No. L 119 of May 4, 2016 p

processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data 95/46 / EC SLEU L119 (hereinafter: the General Regulation), Article 34 of the Act implementing

data and on the free movement of such data data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (hereinafter referred to as the General Protection Regulation data) SL EU

data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general regulation on the protection of data) (Acts. Office. EU L 119, 05

personal data and on the free movement of such data repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) SLEU L119 (hereinafter: the General Regulation)

subjects' right to be informed the requirements of Article 83 (1) to (2) of the EC Treaty fall into the category of more serious infringements (Article 83 (5)

personal data and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (general regulation on the protection data), hereinafter GDPR; Having regard

personal data and the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) SLEU L119 (hereinafter: General Regulation)

data, on the free movement of data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ L 119/1 of May 4, 2016, S 1; hereinafter

data and to the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Regulation on the free movement of data). Data Protection), hereinafter

personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 04.05.2016, p. 1, as amended

data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, with the amendment

data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC SLEU L119 (hereinafter referred to as the "General Regulation") and Art. Of

data and on the free movement of such data data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (hereinafter referred to as the General Protection Regulation data) SL EU

(Romania) Jurisdiction: Romania Relevant Law: Article 13(2) Directive 2002/58/EC Law n° 506/2004 Type: Investigation Outcome: Violation Found Started: Decided:

registered letter, VDF does not know. 4.- VDF considers that art. 25 of the EC to be punishing a specific infringement of the same precept for which it has

the service within the meaning of Article 14 of European Directive 2000/31/EC. Additionally, the controller referred to Article 14 par. 1 of Presidential

deals with the right of access in Article 12 of the Privacy Directive (95/46/EC), which has been replaced by the GDPR, the purpose of the Privacy Directive

personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ 2016 L 119/1, p. 1; hereinafter 'GDPR')

personal data and the free movement of such data, and o repealing Directive 95/46/EC (hereinafter: General Data Protection Regulation) SL EU 119, Article 40 and

and on the free movement of such data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC(GDPR) to pay G. Atanasova and S. Atanasov the amount of BGN 250 for each of

data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; In view of the law

modification in the RGPD, since reproduces almost entirely what Directive 95/46 / EC established on it, and, then, it goes on to state that “ within the transposition

society services, and not Notwithstanding the provisions of Directive 2002/58/EC, the interested party may exercise his right to oppose by automated means

Financial Supervision Act and any other laws implementing Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements

data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Regulation on data protection). Article 2, paragraph This Regulation

data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Official Journal of the EU L 119 of

and on the free movement of such data and on repealing the Directive 95/46/EC SLEU L119 (hereinafter: General Regulation), Article 34 of the Law on the

personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter, "Regulation"); HAVING

provided for in Article 9 of Directive 95/46 / EC are not applicable to the former Article 9 of Directive 95/46 / EC - the counterpart provision of now Article

Union Relevant Law: Article 7 GDPR Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 Directive 2002/58/EC Type: Complaint Outcome: Partly Upheld Started: Decided: 03.05.2021 Published:

personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ L 119/1 of 4 May 2016, p. 1; hereinafter

personnel and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC; Having regard to the law of 1 August 2018 on the organization of the National

personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Regulation on data protection). 2Law No 502 of 23 May 2018 supplementing

data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Regulation on data protection). Article 2, paragraph This Regulation

data and on the free movement of such data and drawing of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter GDPR), this regulation applies

personal data and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general regulation on the data protection), hereinafter GDPR; Considering

data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/ EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; Having regard to the

personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (hereinafter the "DGPS");Considering

legitimate interests of the data controller under Article 7 of Directive 95/46/EC ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party's Guidelines on Transparency under

personnel and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC; Having regard to the law of 1 August 2018 on the organization of the National

noted that the provision on automated calling, pursuant to Directive 2002/58/EC, has been in force since the entry into force of Law No. 3471/2006 and the